Advertisement

Persons Subject to the Duty of Confidentiality

  • Elza Reymond-Eniaeva
Chapter
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR, volume 7)

Abstract

Once the sources of confidentiality obligations have been identified, it is important to catalogue the persons who can be bound by the duty of confidentiality and to determine the scope of their duty. The main addressees of the duty of confidentiality are the parties with their representatives, the arbitrators and the relevant arbitration institution. Although the circle of persons involved in arbitration proceedings is usually limited, there will inevitably be other natural and legal persons, who will have access to the information relating to the arbitration proceedings.

Bibliography

  1. Berger B (2013) Rights and obligations of arbitrators in the deliberations. ASA Bull 31(2):244–261Google Scholar
  2. Berger B, Kellerhals F (2015) International and domestic arbitration in Switzerland, 3rd edn. Staempfli, BernGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackaby N, Partasides C et al (2015) Redfern and hunter on international arbitration, 6th edn. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohnet F, Martenet V (2009) Droit de la profession d’avocat. BernGoogle Scholar
  5. Bondi BJ (2010) No secrets allowed: Congress’s treatment and mistreatment of the attorney-client privilege and the work-product protection in congressional investigations and contempt proceedings. J Law Polit 25(145):145–178Google Scholar
  6. Born GB (2014) International commercial arbitration, 2nd edn. Walters KluwerGoogle Scholar
  7. Bredin JD (2004) Retour au délibéré arbitral. In: Liber amicorum Claude Reymond, Paris, pp 43–51Google Scholar
  8. Brocker S, Löf K (2013) Chapter 8, the proceedings. In: Franke U, Magnusson A et al (eds) International arbitration in Sweden: a practitioner’s guide. Kluwer Law International, pp 153–236Google Scholar
  9. Brown AC (2001) Presumption meets reality: an exploration of the confidentiality obligation in international commercial arbitration. Am Univ Int Law Rev 16(4):969–1025Google Scholar
  10. Bucher A (1988) Le nouvel arbitrage international en Suisse. Helbing & Lichtenhahn, BasleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucher A (2011) Commentary of Article 183 of the private international law act. In: Bucher A (ed) Loi sur le droit international privé/Convention de Lugano, Commentaire Romand. BasleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bucher A, Tschanz PY (1988) International arbitration in Switzerland. Helbing & Lichtenhahn, BasleGoogle Scholar
  13. Burckhardt P (2012) Legal privilege and confidentiality in Switzerland. In: Greenwald D, Russenberger M (eds) Privilege and confidentiality: an international handbook, 2nd edn. Croydon, Bloomsbury ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaix F (2017) Commentary of article 530 of the code of obligations. In: Tercier P, Amstutz M, Trindade T (eds) Code des Obligations II, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 55–65Google Scholar
  15. Chappuis B (2016) La profession d’avocat, 2nd edn. GenèveGoogle Scholar
  16. Chappuis B, Steiner A (2017) Le secret de l’avocat dans le CPP e le CPC: entre divergence et harmonie. Revue de l’avocat 2:87–94Google Scholar
  17. Chen-Wishart M (2018) Contract law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Clay T (2001) L’arbitre. Dalloz, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Corboz B (1993) Le secret professionnel de l’avocat selon l’article 321 CP. SJ pp 77–108Google Scholar
  20. Dal GA (2011) Le secret professionnel de l’avocat dans la jurisprudence européenne/Legal Professional Privilege and European Case Law. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. De Ly P, Friedman M, Radicati di Brozolo LG (2012) International law association international commercial arbitration committee’s report and recommendations on ‘confidentiality in international commercial arbitration. Arbitr Int Kluwer Law Int 28(3):355–396Google Scholar
  22. Derains Y (2005) La pratique du délibéré arbitral. In : Aksen G et al (eds) Global Reflections on international law, commerce and dispute resolution: Liber Amicorum in honour of Robert Briner, pp 221–234Google Scholar
  23. Dessemontet F (1996) Arbitration and confidentiality. Am Rev Int Arbitr 7:229Google Scholar
  24. Dunand JP (2013) Commentary of Article 321a of the code of obligations. In: Dunand JP, Mahon P (eds) Commentaire du contrat de travail. Stämpfli, Bern, pp 52–75Google Scholar
  25. Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit suisse : dispositions générales du CO, 2nd edn. BernGoogle Scholar
  26. Fortier LY (1999) The occasionally unwarranted assumption of confidentiality. Arbitr Int 15:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fox R et al (2013) United Kingdom. In: Professional secrecy of lawyers in Europe/compiled by the Bar of Brussels. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Furrer A (2008) The duty of confidentiality in international arbitration. In: Mélanges en l’honneur de Pierre Tercier. GenèveGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaillard E, de Lapasse P (2011) Le nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage interne et international. Recueil Dalloz 3:175–192Google Scholar
  30. Gaillard E, Savage J (eds) (1999) Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  31. Girsberger D, Voser N (2016) International arbitration, comparative and Swiss perspectives, 3rd edn. Zurich-Basel-Geneva, Schulthess VerlagGoogle Scholar
  32. Grégoire N (2016) Evidentiary Privileges in International Arbitration, A Comparative Analysis under English, American, Swiss and French Law. CG - Collection genevoiseGoogle Scholar
  33. Gu W (2004) Confidentiality revisited: blessing or curse in international commercial arbitration. Am Rev Int Arbitr 15:607Google Scholar
  34. Hall JW (1987) Professional responsibility of the criminal lawyer. Lawyers Co-operative Publishing, RochesterGoogle Scholar
  35. Hargrove J (2009) Misplaced confidence? An analysis of privacy and confidentiality in contemporary international arbitration. Disput Resolut Int 3:47Google Scholar
  36. Heuman L (2003) Arbitration law of Sweden: practice and procedure. Juris, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoffet F (1991) Rechtliche Beziehungen zwischen Shiedsrichtern und Parteien. ZurichGoogle Scholar
  38. Jolles A, Canals de Cediel M (2004) Confidentiality. In: Kaufmann-Kohler G, Stucki B (eds) International arbitration in Switzerland: a handbook for practitioners. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  39. Jolles A, Stark-Traber S, Canals de Cediel M (2013) Chapter 7: confidentiality. In: Geisinger E, Voser N (eds) International arbitration in Switzerland: a handbook for practitioners, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  40. Kuitkowski D (2015) The law applicable to privilege claims in international arbitration. J Int Arbitr 32(1):65–105Google Scholar
  41. Lalive P, Poudret JF, Reymond C (1989) Le droit de l’arbitrage interne et international en Suisse. LausanneGoogle Scholar
  42. Lazareff S (2009) Confidentiality and arbitration: theoretical and philosophical reflections. In: Confidentiality in arbitration/ Commentaries on rules, statutes, case law and practice/ A special supplement to the ICC international court of arbitration bulletin. ICC Publication No. 700, pp 81–93Google Scholar
  43. Lew JDM (2011) The arbitrator and confidentiality. In: Dossier of the ICC Institute of world business law: is arbitration only as good as the arbitrator? Status, powers and role of the arbitratorGoogle Scholar
  44. Lew JDM, Mistelis LA et al (2003) Comparative international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  45. Loquin E (2015) L’arbitrage du commerce international : pratique des affaires. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Joly éditionsGoogle Scholar
  46. Madsen F (2007) Commercial arbitration in Sweden, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Malek HMQC (ed) (2018) Phipson on evidence, 19th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Marin J (1997) Invoking the U.S. attorney-client privilege: Japanese corporate quasi-lawyers deserve protection in U.S. Courts Too. Fordham Int Law J 21(4):1558–1605Google Scholar
  49. Maurer P, Gross JP (2010) Commentary of Article 13 LLCA. In: Vaticos M, Reiser CM, Chappuis B (eds) Loi sur les avocats, Commentaire romand, Basle, pp 142–211Google Scholar
  50. Merkin R, Flannery L (2014) Arbitration act 1996, 5th edn. Informa, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer-Hauser BF (2004) Das Anwaltsgeheimnis und Schiedsgericht. SchulthessGoogle Scholar
  52. Moreillon L, Parein-Reymond A (2016) Code de procédure pénale, Petit commentaire, 2nd edn. BasleGoogle Scholar
  53. Morin A (2012) Commentary of article 1 of the code of obligations. In: Thévenoz L, Werro F (eds) Code des Obligations I, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 8–54Google Scholar
  54. Mosk RM, Ginsburg T (2001) Evidentiary privileges in international arbitration. Int Comp Law Q 50:345–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller C (2005) La confidentialité en arbitrage commercial international: un trompe-l’oeil. ASA Bull 23(2):216–240Google Scholar
  56. Nesbitt S, Darowski M (2015) LCIA arbitration rules, Article 30. In: Mistelis LA (ed) Concise international arbitration, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, pp 558–560Google Scholar
  57. Nottage L (2017) Australia’s International Arbitration Act Amendments: Rejuvenation by a Thousand Cuts? Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 13 May 2017, available at www.kluwerarbitrationblog.com. Last visited 13 Sept 2018
  58. O’Sullivan J, Hilliard J (2012) The law of contract, 5th edn. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  59. Pattenden R (2003) The law of professional-client confidentiality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Poudret JF, Besson S (2007) Comparative law of international arbitration, 2nd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Raymond AH (2005) Confidentiality in a forum of last resort: is the use of confidential arbitration a good idea for business and society? Am Rev Int Arbitr 16:479Google Scholar
  62. Reiser CM, Valticos M (2015) Les règles professionnelles et les activités atypiques de l’avocat inscrit au barreau. Semaine Judiciaire 2015 II 191Google Scholar
  63. Reymond JM (2007) Le secret professionnel de l’avocat dans les projets de code de procédure pénale et civile suisses: un droit fondamental du justiciable en péril. Revue de l’avocat 2:63–66Google Scholar
  64. Ritz P (2007) Die Geheimhaltung im Schiedsverfahren nach schweizerischem Recht. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  65. Ritz P (2010) Privacy and confidentiality obligation on parties in arbitration under Swiss law. J Int Arbitr 27(3):221–245Google Scholar
  66. Rivkin DW (1991) Restrictions on foreign counsel in international arbitration. In: van den Berg AJ (ed) Yearbook commercial arbitration, vol XVI. Kluwer Law International, pp 402–412Google Scholar
  67. Rogers CA (2014) Ethics in international arbitration. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  68. Roney DP, von der Weid K (2013) Third-party funding in international arbitration: new opportunities and new challenges. In: Müller C, Rigozzi A (eds) New developments in international commercial arbitration 2013. Schulthess Verlag, Zurich, pp 183–207Google Scholar
  69. Rüede T, Hadenfeldt R (1993) Schweizerisches Schiedsgerichtsrecht nach Konkordat und IPRG, 2nd edn. ZurichGoogle Scholar
  70. Schlosser PF (2005) Generalizable approaches to agreements with experts and witnesses acting in arbitration and international litigation. In: Aksen G et al (eds) Global reflections on international law, commerce and dispute resolution: Liber Amicorum in honour of Robert Briner. ICC Publications, pp 775–793Google Scholar
  71. Schöldström P (1998) The Arbitrator’s mandate, a comparative study of relationships in commercial arbitration under the laws of England, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Stockholm University, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  72. Schweizer P (2011) Commentary of Article 170 of the code of civil procedure. In: Bohnet F, Haldy J, Jeandin N, Schweizer P, Tappy D (eds) Code de Procédure Civile Commenté. BasleGoogle Scholar
  73. Shaughnessy P (2006) The Swedish approach towards arbitration. In: Heuman L, Jarvin S (eds) The Swedish arbitration act of 1999, five years on: a critical review of strengths and weaknesses. Juris, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Shirlow E (2015) Recent developments in Australia’s approach to confidentiality and transparency in international arbitration. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 19 December 2015, available at www.kluwerarbitrationblog.com. Last visited 13 Sept 2018
  75. Smeureanu IM (2011) Confidentiality in international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  76. Smith G (1999) Feature: confidentiality and the Attorney-Client Privilege: a few fundamentals. Louisina Bar J 326:47Google Scholar
  77. Stacher M (2007) Die Rechtsnatur der Schiedsvereinbarung. PhD Thesis at St. Gallen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor N (ed) (1993) The guide to the professional conduct of solicitors, 6th edn. Law Society Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Tercier P, Pichonnaz P (2012) Le droit des obligations, 5th edn. ZurichGoogle Scholar
  80. Tercier P, Bieri L, Carron B (2016) Les contrats spéciaux. ZurichGoogle Scholar
  81. Thévenoz L (2012) Commentary of Article 101 of the code of obligations. In: Thévenoz L, Werro F (eds) Code des Obligations I, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 735–760Google Scholar
  82. Timár K (2013) The legal relationship between the parties and the arbitral institution. Elte Law J 1:103–122Google Scholar
  83. Tjio H (2009) The limits of confidentiality in arbitration/Emmott v. Michael Wilson & Partners. Lloyd’s Marit Commer Law Q 1:10–15Google Scholar
  84. Tweeddale A (2005) Confidentiality in arbitration and the public interest exception. Arbitr Int 21(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Von Goeler J (2016) Third-party funding in international arbitration and its impact on procedure. International arbitration law library, vol 35. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  86. Von Schlabrendorff F, Sheppard A (2005) Conflict of legal privileges in international arbitration: an attempt to find a holistic solution. In: Aksen G et al (eds) Global reflections on international law, commerce and dispute resolution: liber Amicorum in honour of Robert Briner. ICC Publications, pp 743–774Google Scholar
  87. Voser N, Fischer E (2013) The arbitral tribunal. In: Geisinger E, Voser N (eds) International arbitration in Switzerland: a handbook for practitioners, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, pp 51–71Google Scholar
  88. Weber PC (1993) La responsabilité de l’expert à l’égard des parties et du tribunal arbitral. ASA Bull 11(2):190–209Google Scholar
  89. Webster TH, Bühler MW (2014) Handbook of ICC arbitration, 3rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  90. Werro F (1993) Le mandat et ses effets, Une étude sur le contrat d’activité indépendante selon le Code suisse des obligations. FribourgGoogle Scholar
  91. Werro F (2012b) Commentary of Article 394 of the code of obligations. In: Thévenoz L, Werro F (eds), Code des Obligations I, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 2369–2384Google Scholar
  92. Würzburger A (2014) Commentary of Article 27 of the Law on the Federal Supreme Court. In: Corboz B, Würzburger A et al. (eds) Commentaire de la LTF, 2nd edn. BernGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elza Reymond-Eniaeva
    • 1
  1. 1.LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations