• Elza Reymond-Eniaeva
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR, volume 7)


Confidentiality is the opposite of publicity. It can be defined as an ‘obligation to protect information that is not generally known and to use or disclose it only to approved persons, for agreed purposes’. Thus, the purpose of confidentiality is to prevent disclosure to third parties, but not the use of the information between the same parties. This definition also implies that a complete confidentiality cannot be achieved as, in some cases, the confidential information will have to be disclosed.


  1. Ashford P (2014) Handbook on international commercial arbitration, 2nd edn. Jurisnet, HuntingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bührung-Uhle C (2006) Arbitration and mediation in international business, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  3. Lazareff S (2009) Confidentiality and arbitration: theoretical and philosophical reflections. In: Confidentiality in arbitration/ Commentaries on rules, statutes, case law and practice/ A special supplement to the ICC international court of arbitration bulletin. ICC Publication No. 700, pp 81–93Google Scholar
  4. Pattenden R (2003) The law of professional-client confidentiality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Paulsson J (1995) The decision of the High Court of Australia in Esso/BHP v. Plowman. Arbitr Int 11(3):231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pryles M (2014) Confidentiality. In: Newman LW, Hill RD (eds) The leading arbitrators’ guide to international arbitration, 3rd edn. Juris, Huntington, pp 109–160Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elza Reymond-Eniaeva
    • 1
  1. 1.LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations