‘I Think I Disagree’: Murdoch on Wittgenstein and Inner Life (MGM Chapter 9)

  • Anne-Marie Søndergaard Christensen


After receiving a copy of Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals, Murdoch’s friend Brian Medlin writes back: ‘So far I think I disagree with what you say in “Wittgenstein and the Inner Life,” but I’ll have to make sure that I’ve understood you aright (so there!) before I launch into a complaint.’ Here, I reconstruct Murdoch’s reading of Wittgenstein and show its ambivalence. While Murdoch acknowledges Wittgenstein’s aim to dissolve illusionary ideas about the inner, she also thinks he presents substantial theses threatening the reality of inner life. Murdoch’s misreading of Wittgenstein as a constructive philosopher may be what worries Medlin, and it also prevents Murdoch from seeing Wittgenstein as an ally in the endeavour to demonstrate the morally transformative potential of our inner lives.


  1. Baker, G.P., and P.M.S. Hacker. 1984. Critical study: On misunderstanding Wittgenstein: Kripke’s private language argument. Synthese 58 (3): 407–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen, A.-M.S. 2011. Wittgenstein and ethics. In Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein, ed. Oskari Kuusela and Marie McGinn, 776–817. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Diamond, C. 2010. Murdoch the explorer. Philosophical Topics 38 (1): 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dooley, G., and G. Nerlich (eds.). 2014. Never mind about the bourgeoisie: The correspondence between Iris Murdoch and Brian Medlin 1976–1995. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Goldfarb, W. 2014. Kripke on Wittgenstein on rules. In Rule-following and meaning, ed. Alexander Miller and Crispin Wright, 92–107. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. McDowell, J. 1998. Wittgenstein on following a rule. In Mind, value, and reality, 221–262, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Murdoch, I. 1956. Vision and choice in morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 30: 32–58.Google Scholar
  9. Murdoch, I. 1992. Metaphysics as a guide to morals. (Abbreviated MGM.) London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  10. Murdoch, I. 2001. The sovereignty of good. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, trans. D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical investigations/Philosophische Untersuchungen, 4th ed., ed. P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Søndergaard Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Syddansk UniversitetOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations