Simulating Cognitive Deficits in Parkinson’s Disease

Part of the Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems book series (SSCNS, volume 13)


Parkinson’s disease (PD) is caused by the accelerated death of dopamine–producing neurons. Numerous studies documenting cognitive deficits of people with PD have revealed impairment in a variety of tasks related to memory, learning, visuospatial skills, and attention. In this chapter, we describe a general approach used to model PD and review three computational models that have been used to simulate cognitive deficits related to PD. The models presentation is followed by a discussion of the role of glia cells and astrocytes in neurodegenerative diseases. We propose that more biologically–realistic computational models of neurodegenerative diseases that include astrocytes may lead to a better understanding and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases in general and PD in particular.


Parkinson’s disease Dopamine Astrocytes 



This research was funded in part by the National Institute of Mental Health, award #2R01MH063760.


  1. 1.
    Fearnley JM, Lees AJ (1991) Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain 114:2283–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibb WR, Lees AJ (1991) Anatomy, pigmentation, ventral and dorsal subpopulations of the substantia nigra, and differential cell death in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, Jellinger K, Seitelberger F (1973) Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations. J Neurol Sci 20:415–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gotham AM, Brown RG, Marsden CD (1988) “Frontal” cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease “on”and “off” levodopa. Brain 111:299–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poliakoff E, Smith-Spark JH (2008) Everyday cognitive failures and memory problems in Parkinson’s patients without dementia. Brain Cogn 67:340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hélie S, Chakravarthy S, Moustafa AA (2013) Exploring the cognitive and motor functions of the basal ganglia: an integrative review of computational cognitive neuroscience models. Front Comput Neurosci 7:174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glimcher PW (2011) Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:15647–15654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wickens J, Kotter R (1995) Cellular models of reinforcement. In: Houks JC, Davis JL, Beiser DG (eds) Models of information processing in the basal ganglia. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Monchi O, Taylor JG, Dagher A (2000) A neural model of working memory processes in normal subjects, Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia for fMRI design and predictions. Neural Netw 13:953–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G (1993) Wisconsin card sorting test manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., OdessaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frank MJ (2005) Dynamic dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia: a neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in medicated and nonmedicated Parkinsonism. J Cogn Neurosci 17:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ashby FG, Alfonso-Reese LA, Turken AU, Waldron EM (1998) A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychol Rev 105(3):442–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashby FG, Valentin VV (2017) Multiple systems of perceptual category learning: theory and cognitive tests. In: Cohen H, Lefebvre C (eds) Handbook of categorization in cognitive science, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 157–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hélie S, Paul EJ, Ashby FG (2012) A neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 50(9):2290–2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hélie S, Paul EJ, Ashby FG (2012) Simulating the effects of dopamine imbalance on cognition: from positive affect to Parkinson’s disease. Neural Netw 32:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pasti L, Volterra A, Pozzan T, Carmignoto G (1997) Intracellular calcium oscillations in astrocytes: a highly plastic, bidirectional form of communication between neurons and astrocytes in situ. J Neurosci 17(20):7817–7830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Araque A, Carmignoto G, Haydon PG (2001) Dynamic signaling between astrocytes and neurons. Ann Rev Physiol 63(1):795–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perea G, Navarrete M, Araque A (2009) Tripartite synapses: astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends Neurosci 32(8):421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rusakov DA, Zheng K, Henneberger C (2011) Astrocytes as regulators of synaptic function a quest for the ca2+ master key. The Neuroscientist 17(5):513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haydon PG (2001) Glia: listening and talking to the synapse. Nat Rev Neurosci 2(3):185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, Bennett ML, Münch AE, Chung WS, Peterson TC et al (2017) Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541(7638):481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maragakis NJ, Rothstein JD (2006) Mechanisms of disease: astrocytes in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2(12):679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jellinger KA (2010) Basic mechanisms of neurodegeneration: a critical update. J Cell Mol Med 14(3):457–487PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Forman MS, Lal D, Zhang B, Dabir DV, Swanson E, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ (2005) Transgenic mouse model of tau pathology in astrocytes leading to nervous system degeneration. J Neurosci 25(14):3539–3550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lobb C (2014) Abnormal bursting as a pathophysiological mechanism in Parkinson’s disease. Basal Ganglia 3(4):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Izhikevich EM (2007) Dynamical systems in neuroscience. Cambridge, MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hodgkin AL (1951) The ionic basis of electrical activity in nerve and muscle. Biol Rev 26(4):339–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Porto-Pazos AB, Veiguela N, Mesejo P, Navarrete M, Alvarellos A, Ibáñez O, Pazos A, Araque A (2011) Artificial astrocytes improve neural network performance. PloS One 6(4):e19109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alvarellos-González A, Pazos A, Porto-Pazos AB (2012) Computational models of neuron-astrocyte interactions lead to improved efficacy in the performance of neural networks. Comput Math Methods Med 2012:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sajedinia Z (2014) Artificial astrocyte networks, as components in artificial neural networks. In: Unconventional computation and natural computation. Springer, pp 316–326Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nadkarni S, Jung P (2004) Dressed neurons: modeling neural–glial interactions. Phys Biol 1(1):35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Valenza G, Tedesco L, Lanatà A, De Rossi D, Scilingo EP (2013) Novel spiking neuron-astrocyte networks based on nonlinear transistor-like models of tripartite synapses. In: 2013 35th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 6559–6562Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haghiri S, Ahmadi A, Nouri M, Heidarpur M (2014) An investigation on neuroglial interaction effect on Izhikevich neuron behaviour. In: 2014 22nd Iranian conference on electrical engineering (ICEE). IEEE, pp 88–92Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sajedinia Z, Hélie S. (2018) A new computational model for astrocytes and their role in biologically realistic neural networks. Comput Intell Neurosci 2018Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pannasch U, Vargová L, Reingruber J, Ezan P, Holcman D, Giaume C, Syková E, Rouach N (2011) Astroglial networks scale synaptic activity and plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(20):8467–8472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hélie S, Fleischer P (2016) Simulating the effect of reinforcement learning on neuronal synchrony and periodicity in the striatum. Front Comput Neurosci 10:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ponzi A, Wickens J (2010) Sequentially switching cell assemblies in random inhibitory networks of spiking neurons in the striatum. J Neurosci 30:5894–5911CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations