Advertisement

Pursuing Equity Through Policy in the Schooling Sector 2007–2017

  • Martin GustafssonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Policy Implications of Research in Education book series (PIRE, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter evaluates policies governing the schooling sector over 10 years against both official intentions, and the international consensus on optimal education policies as expressed by UNESCO. Poor results in international assessments helped shift South Africa’s policy emphasis, in around 2007, from equity of school resourcing to the equity of learning outcomes. Learning outcomes subsequently improved, and became less unequal, according to TIMSS and PIRLS. Three policy changes stand out as likely contributors to this trend: greater clarity in the curriculum documents; the beginnings of a national assessment system; and a greater availability of high-quality texts amongst students. South Africa’s experiences with national assessments are instructive. The absence of a statement of purpose resulted in misuse of the programme, and unnecessary conflicts with teacher unions. This made it easier for unions to halt the programme. Moving forward, South Africa will need to focus on re-instituting a national assessment programme, and on working towards a better policy framework governing teacher incentives. Better guidance to teachers on how to teach reading is also needed.

Keywords

South Africa Educational inequality Teacher policy Assessments 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Work on this chapter is funded by the National Research Foundation.

References

  1. Australian Council for Educational Research. (2013). Formative evaluation of textbooks and workbooks. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.Google Scholar
  2. Bruns, B., Evans, D., & Luque, J. (2012). Achieving world-class education in Brazil: The next Agenda. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Centre for Development and Enterprise. (2009). International best practice in schooling reform: What can South Africa learn from other countries? Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  4. Centre for Development and Enterprise. (2015). Low-fee private schools: International experience and international realities. Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  5. Crouch, L. (2005). South Africa equity and quality reforms: Possible lessons. Journal of Education for International Development, 1(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. Democratic Alliance. (2008). The DA’s policy on education – ‘Preparing for Success’. Cape Town.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Basic Education. (2011). Integrated strategic planning framework for teacher education and development in South Africa. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Basic Education. (2014). The ministerial task team report on the national senior certificate. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Basic Education. (2015). Action plan 2019 towards the realisation of schooling 2030: Taking forward South Africa’s national development plan 2030. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Basic Education. (2016a). Proposals on the re-design of the annual national assessments for 2016 and beyond. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Basic Education. (2016b). Report of the ministerial task team appointed by Minister Angie Motshekga to investigate allegations into the selling of posts of educators by members of teachers Unions and Departmental Officials in Provincial Education Departments. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Basic Education. (2016c). Report on progress in the schooling sector against key learner performance and attainment indicators. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Basic Education. (2017). Summary report: Results of year 2 impact evaluation: The early grade reading study. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  14. Historic Schools Restoration Project. (2010). Annual report 2009/2010. Cape Town.Google Scholar
  15. Howie, S., Venter, E., Van Staden, S., Zimmerman, L., Long, C., Scherman, V., & Archer, E. (2008). Progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) 2006 summary report: South African children’s reading literacy achievement. Pretoria: University of Pretoria, Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.Google Scholar
  16. Howie, S., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G., & Palane, N. M. (2017). PIRLS literacy 2017: South African highlights report. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.Google Scholar
  17. Inbar, D. (1996). Planning for innovation in education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  18. Meyer, I., & Gent, P. (2016). The status of ICT in education in South Africa and the way forward. Pretoria: NECT.Google Scholar
  19. Reddy, V., Bhorat, H., Powell, M., Visser, M. M., & Arends, F. (2016). Skills supply and demand in South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/10186.Google Scholar
  20. Schirmer, S., McCarthy, J., Oliphant, R., & Bernstein, A. (2013). The missing sector: Contract schools. Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  21. Sherman, J. D., & Poirier, J. M. (2007). Educational equity and public policy: Comparing results from 16 countries. Citeseer.Google Scholar
  22. South Africa: Department of Education. (1995). White paper on education and training. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  23. South Africa: Department of Education. (2006). The national policy framework for teacher education and development in South Africa. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  24. South Africa: Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. (2014). The impact of the introduction of Grade R on learning outcomes. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  25. South Africa: Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. (2016). Funza Lushaka Bursary programme implementation evaluation.Google Scholar
  26. South Africa: Parliament. (2017). Report of the high level panel on the assessment of key legislation and the acceleration of fundamental change. Cape Town: South Africa: Parliament.Google Scholar
  27. South African Council for Educators. (2012). The status of the CPTD management system: A report based on the pilot. Pretoria: SACE.Google Scholar
  28. South African Democratic Teachers Union. (2008). SADTU national general council 22–25 October 2008 resolutions. Kempton Park: SADTU.Google Scholar
  29. Spaull, N. (2016). Excessive class sizes in the foundation phase. Policy Brief Research on Socioeconomic Policy (RESEP) (Online). Available: www.resep.sun.ac.za
  30. Statistics South Africa. (2017). Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of absolute poverty between 2005 and 2015. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  31. UNESCO. (2014). Education for all global monitoring report 2013/4: Teaching and learning: Achieving quality education for all. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  32. Van der Berg, S., & Gustafsson, M. (2017). Quality of basic education. A report to working group 1 of the high level panel on the assessment of key legislation. Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
  33. Van der Berg, S., Spaull, N., Wills, G., Gustafsson, M., & Kotzé, J. (2016). Identifying binding constraints in education (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2906945). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  34. Van der Berg, S., Van Wyk, C., Burger, R., Kotzé J, Piek, M., & Rich, K. (2017). The performance of low fee independent schools in South Africa – What can available data tell?.Google Scholar
  35. Wildeman, R., & Hemmer-Vitti, R. (2010). Where to for provincial education?: Reviewing provincial education budgets 2006 to 2012. African Books Collective.Google Scholar
  36. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zille, H. (2013). Well done, Angie Motshekga. Available from: https://m.news24.com [Accessed January 2018].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Basic Education and ReSEPUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations