Advertisement

Surgical Management of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous Melanoma and Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

  • Jamie Green Rand
  • Charlotte AriyanEmail author
Chapter
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

The management of lymph node metastases in cutaneous melanoma (CM) and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), malignancy of skin appendages and some kind of soft tissue sarcomas like epitheloid and clear cell sarcomas remains a controversial topic, with no prospective studies demonstrating convincing evidence of improved survival with nodal dissection. It is, however, clear that lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in early-stage melanoma and adequate nodal evaluation is necessary for accurate staging. With the advent of lymphatic mapping with vital blue dye and radiocolloid, the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma patients has been revolutionary in decreasing the number of patients undergoing elective lymph-node dissection [1]. As in breast cancer, SLNB has been shown to be extremely prognostic, with a negative SLNB successfully identifying patients that will have a better prognosis, and that are unlikely to have positive nodes in the remainder of the nodal basin [2]. Although the morbidity is notably lower than in complete lymphadenectomy, SLNB still carries a morbidity rate of approximately 10% and is therefore not recommended in all melanoma patients [1]. In 2012, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) created a joint clinical practice guideline for the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for melanoma [3] (see also Chaps.  6 and  22).

References

  1. 1.
    Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):976–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wong SL, Balch CM, Hurley P, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2912–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrek JA, Blackwood MM. Axillary dissection: current practice and technique. Curr Probl Surg. 1995;32(4):257–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitteldorf C, Bertsch HP, Jung K, et al. Sentinel node biopsy improves prognostic stratification in patients with thin (pT1) melanomas and an additional risk factor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(7):2252–8.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3641-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(7):599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morton DL. Overview and update of the phase III Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials (MSLT-I and MSLT-II) in melanoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2012;29(7):699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252(3):426–32. discussion 432–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Townsend C Jr, Evers BM. Atlas of general surgical techniques. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. p. 1100–21.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pasquali S, Spillane A. Contemporary controversies and perspectives in the staging and treatment of patients with lymph node metastasis from melanoma, especially with regards positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(8):893–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khatri VP, Espinosa MH. Constant landmark for simplified identification of the long thoracic nerve during mastectomy. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64(1):82–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zin T, Maw M, Oo S, Pai D, Paijan R, Kyi M. How I do it: Simple and effortless approach to identify thoracodorsal nerve on axillary clearance procedure. Ecancermedicalscience. 2012;6:255.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macchi V, Tiengo C, Porzionato A, et al. Medial and lateral pectoral nerves: course and branches. Clin Anat. 2007;20(2):157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karakousis CP. Technique of lymphadenectomy for melanoma. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 1992;1:157–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khatri VP. Atlas of advanced operative surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. p. 486–93.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel A, et al. Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):664–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson RT, Kimmick GG, McCoy TP, et al. A randomized trial of exercise on well-being and function following breast cancer surgery: the RESTORE trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(2):172–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hershko DD, Stahl S. Safety of elective hand surgery following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Breast J. 2007;13(3):287–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00423.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Starritt EC, Joseph D, McKinnon JG, Lo SK, de Wilt JHW, Thompson JF. Lymphedema after complete axillary node dissection for melanoma: assessment using a new, objective definition. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):866–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Resident General SurgeryWeill Cornell Hospital, City of HopeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations