Advertisement

Surface Treatment of Lignin Sourced Carbon Fibers: Principles, Processes, and Challenges

  • Sibel Demiroğlu Mustafov
  • Mehmet Özgür Seydibeyoğlu
Chapter

Abstract

In recent decades, carbon fibers (CFs) have attracted attention for their potential use as structural materials in sports, cars, aerospace, and bridges. Also, carbon fibers have been considered as the next-generation materials in the aviation industry, which have presented an enormous chance for the entire supply chain of carbon fibers. However, they are having inert surface and do not allow matrix material to make bonding with it. For this reason, the surface treatment of carbon fibers is one of the advised methods to develop adhesion between the two. So, good adhesion between the carbon fiber and the matrix must be supplied in order to maximize performance. In this chapter, we will introduce the brief overview of surface treatment for carbon fibers based on lignin showing superior performance and developing processability. Surface treatment, for lignin-based carbon fibers, is discussed primarily to identify the mechanism of interphase formation. The objective of this chapter is to review numerous methods used for the surface treatment of carbon fibers and to provide details on mechanical, chemical, and morphological changes happen in carbon fiber properties. It will also be presented that mainly used surface treatment methods are chemical, dry, and nano-surface treatments. Comparative study of these different methods helps in the selection of suitable surface treatment method in accordance with the requirement. Selecting appropriate surface-treatment methods might modify the carbon fiber surface through increasing the surface functional groups and surface area. Additionally, they can modify the carbon fiber surface with increasing the electro properties components on the surface for supplying the carbon fiber-matrix interactions.

Keywords

Lignin Carbon fiber Surface treatment Composites Sizing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

2015-TDR-FEBE-0011 and 2016-ÖNP-MÜM-0002 projects are highly acknowledged for this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    D.A. Baker, T.G. Rials, Recent advances in low-cost carbon fibre manufacture from lignin. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130, 713–728 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Norgren, H. Edlund, Lignin: recent advances and emerging applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 19, 409–416 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Thunga, K. Chen, D. Grewell, M.R. Kessler, Bio-renewable precursor fibers from lignin/polylactide blends for conversion to carbon fibers. Carbon 68, 159–166 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.E. Luckachan, C.K.S. Pillai, Biodegradable polymers—a review on recent trends and emerging perspectives. J. Polym. Environ. 19(3), 637–676 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Kubo, J.F. Kadla, Lignin-based carbon fibers: effect of synthetic polymer blending on fiber properties. J. Polym. Environ. 13(2), 97–105 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Attwenger, Value-Added Lignin Based Carbon Fibre from Organosolv Fractionation of Poplar and Switchgrass. Thesis, Master of Science, University of Tennessee—Knoxville, USA, 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Zhang, Carbon Fibres Derived from Dry-Spinning of Modified Lignin Precursors. Ph.D Thesis, Chemical Engineering, Clemson University, 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Luo, Lignin Based Carbon Fibre. Thesis Master of Science, Chemical Engineering University of Maine, USA, 2004Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Uraki, S. Kubo, Mokuzai Gakkaishi 52, 337 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.F. Kadla, S. Kubo, R.D. Gilbert, R.A. Venditti, A.L. Compere, W.L. Griffith, Lignin-based carbon fibres for composite fibre applications. Carbon 40(15), 2913–2920 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.O. Seydibeyoglu, A novel partially biobased PAN-lignin blend as a potential carbon fibre precursor. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 598324 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/598324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.K. Black, B.R. Hames, M.D. Myers. U.S. Patent 5,730,837, assigned to Midwest Research Institute, 1998Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.J. Bozell, C. O’Lenick, S. Warwick, Biomass fractionation for the biorefinery: heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence–nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of lignin isolated from solvent fractionation of switchgrass. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 9232–9242 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Wang et al., Shear strength and fracture toughness of carbon fibre/epoxy interface: effect of surface treatment. Mater. Des. 85, 800–807 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Kenealy, G.B. Diller, X. Ren, Enzymatic modification of fibers for textile and forest products industries, in Modified Fibers with Medical and Specialty Applications, ed. by V. Edwards, G. Buschle-Diller, S. Goheen, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2006), pp. 191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.S. Hockenberger, Surface modification of textiles for composite and filtration applications, in Surface Modification of Textiles, ed. by Q. Wei, (Woodhead, Cambridge, 2009), pp. 238–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. Guterl, P. Ehrburger, Role of chemistry in advanced carbon-based composites, in Fibers and Composites, ed. by P. Delhae’s, (Taylor & Francis, London, 2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. K. Mohanty, M. Misra, L. T. Drzal (eds.), Natural Fibers, Biopolymers, and Biocomposites (Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Sharma et al., Feature article: carbon fiber surfaces and composite interphases. Compos. Sci. Technol. 102, 35–50 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Su, Z. Zhang, K. Wang, W. Jiang, W. Liu, Tribological and mechanical properties of the composites made of carbon fabrics modified with various methods. Compos. A 36, 1601–1607 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Guo, Y.D. Huang, L.H. Meng, L. Liu, D.P. Fan, D.X. Liu, Interface property of carbon fibers/epoxy resin composite improved by hydrogen peroxide in supercritical water. Mater. Lett. 63, 1531–1534 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. El-Sabbagh, Effect of coupling agent on natural fiber in natural fiber/polypropylene composites on mechanical and thermal behaviour. Compos. Part B 57, 126–135 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Xu, X. Wang, Y. Lu, Surface modification of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber and its interaction with imide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 2695–2701 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    X. Li, L.G. Tabil, S. Panigrahi, Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J. Polym. Environ. 15(1), 25–33 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Kalia, B.S. Kaith, I. Kaur, Pretreatments of natural fibers and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites—a review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 49(7), 1253–1272 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, Y.L. Bin, A novel surface modification of carbon fiber for high-performance thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 382, 144–154 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Z. Dai, Z. Baoyan, S. Fenghui, L. Min, Z. Zuoguang, G. Yizhuo, Chemical interaction between carbon fibers and surface sizing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124(3), 2127–2132 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.L. Weitzsacker, Studies of the effect of size on carbon fiber surfaces. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12(4), 2392 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R.L. Zhang, J.S. Zhang, L.H. Zhao, Y.L. Sun, Sizing agent on the carbon fibers surface and interface properties of its composites. Fibers Polym. 16(3), 657–663 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Dilsiz, J.P. Wightman, Surface analysis of unsized and sized carbon fibers. Carbon 37(7), 1105–1114 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Morgan, Carbon Fibers and Their Composites (Taylor & Francis Print, Boca Raton, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.L. Zhang, Y.D. Huang, D. Su, L. Liu, Y.R. Tang, Influence of sizing molecular weight on the properties of carbon fibers and its composites. Mater. Des. 34, 649–654 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Yumitori, D. Wang, F.R. Jones, The role of sizing resins in carbon fibre-reinforced polyethersulfone (PES). Composites 25(7), 698–705 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. Gndinger, P. Middendorf, B. Fox, Interfacial shear strength studies of experimental carbon fibers, novel thermosetting polyurethane and epoxy matrices and bespoke sizing agents. Compos. Sci. Technol. 133, 104–110 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. Yuan, S. Zhang, C. Lu, S. He, F. An, Improved interfacial adhesion in carbon fiber/polyether sulfone composites through an organic solvent-free polyamic acid sizing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 279, 279–284 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Liu, T. Yuli, C. Yujia, L. Jieying, Interfacial and mechanical properties of carbon fibers modified by electrochemical oxidation in (NH4HCO3)/(NH4)2C2O4·H2O aqueous compound solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256(21), 6199–6204 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    C.U. Pittman, W. Jiang, Z.R. Yue, C.A. Leon, Y. Leon, Surface area and pore size distribution of microporous carbon fibers prepared by electrochemical oxidation. Carbon 37(1), 85–96 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. Li, Y. Lin, M. Yiu-Wing, Application of plasma technologies in fibre-reinforced polymer composites: a review of recent developments. Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 28(1), 73–86 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.P. Boudou, J.I. Paredes, A. Cuesta, A. Martı́nez-Alonso, J.M.D. Tascón, Oxygen plasma modification of pitch-based isotropic carbon fibres. Carbon 41(1), 41–56 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. Bismarck, M.E. Kumru, J. Springer, Influence of oxygen plasma treatment of PAN-based carbon fibers on their electrokinetic and wetting properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 210(1), 60–72 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.A. Montes-Morán, A. Martı́nez-Alonso, J.M.D. Tascón, R.J. Young, Effects of plasma oxidation on the surface and interfacial properties of ultra-high modulus carbon fibres. Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 32(3–4), 361–371 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.A. Montes-Morán, R.J. Young, Raman spectroscopy study of HM carbon fibres: effect of plasma treatment on the interfacial properties of single fibre/epoxy composites. Carbon 40(6), 845–855 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    K. Ma, W. Baichen, C. Ping, Z. Xia, Plasma treatment of carbon fibers: non-equilibrium dynamic adsorption and its effect on the mechanical properties of RTM fabricated composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257(9), 3824–3830 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    C.U. Pittman, W. Jiang, G.R. He, S.D. Gardner, Oxygen plasma and isobutylene plasma treatments of carbon fibers: determination of surface functionality and effects on composite properties. Carbon 36(1–2), 25–37 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    S. Tiwari, S. Mohit, P. Stephane, M. Brigitte, Mater. Sci. 46(4), 964–974 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    K.F. Köster, P. Schwartz, Influence of acetylene plasma treatment on the torsional fatigue of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite strands. Compos. Sci. Technol. 60(10), 2005–2010 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    N. Dilsiz, N.K. Erinç, E. Bayramli, G. Akovali, Surface energy and mechanical properties of plasma-modified carbon fibers. Carbon 33(6), 853–858 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Erden, K.C.H. Kingsley, S. Lamoriniere, A.F. Lee, H. Yildiz, A. Bismarck, Continuous atmospheric plasma oxidation of carbon fibres: influence on the fibre surface and bulk properties and adhesion to polyamide 12. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 30, 471–487 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    X. Zhang, Y. Huang, T. Wang, Plasma activation of carbon fibers for polyarylacetylene composites. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 4965–4968 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. Fukunaga, U. Shigetomo, Anodic surface oxidation for pitch-based carbon fibers and the interfacial bond strengths in epoxy matrices. Compos. Sci. Technol. 60(2), 249–254 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Y.Z. Wan, Y.L. Wang, Y. Huang, H.L. Luo, G.C. Chen, C.D. Yuan, Effect of surface treatment of carbon fibers with gamma-ray radiation on mechanical performance of their composites. J. Mater. Sci. 40(13), 3355–3359 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J. Li, H. Yudong, X. Zhiwei, W. Zhuo, High-energy radiation technique treat on the surface of carbon fiber. Mater. Chem. Phys. 94(2–3), 315–321 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Z. Xu, H. Yudong, Z. Chunhua, C. Gang, Influence of rare earth treatment on interfacial properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 444(1–2), 170–177 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Q. Zhang, L. Jianwei, S. Ryan, D. Liming, B. Jeffery, Hierarchical composites of carbon nanotubes on carbon fiber: influence of growth condition on fiber tensile properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69(5), 594–601 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    R.B. Mathur, C. Sourav, B.P. Singh, Growth of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibre substrates to produce hybrid/phenolic composites with improved mechanical properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68(7–8), 1608–1615 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sibel Demiroğlu Mustafov
    • 1
  • Mehmet Özgür Seydibeyoğlu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Nanotechnology and Nanoscienceİzmir Katip Çelebi UniversityİzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Material Science and Engineeringİzmir Katip Çelebi UniversityİzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations