The Hyperzone: Is There a Space on This Screen?

  • Camille Manfredi
Part of the Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies book series (GSLS)


This chapter turns to the digital domain to view the artists’ online practices and use of new technologies as creative interplays between tradition and innovation, between old and new patterns of perception of the space thus re-presented, in the in-between of materiality and virtuality, and of ‘real’ and imaginary Scotland.


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. [2006] 2009. What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, Walter. [1936] 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bourriaud, Nicolas. [1998] 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2002. Postproduction. Culture as Screenplay: How Art Reprograms the World. Trans. Jeanine Herman. New York: Lukas and Sternberg.Google Scholar
  5. Casey, Edward S. [1993] 2009. Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. New Haven: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. De Certeau, Michel. [1984] 2011. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven F. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gervais, Bertrand. 2007. Is There a Text on This Screen? Reading in an Era of Hypertextuality. In A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, ed. Ray Siemens and Susan Schreibman, 182–202. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Lanier, Jaron. 2018. Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now. New York: Henry Hold.Google Scholar
  9. Lotman, Yuri. 1990. Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  11. Nancy, Jean-Luc. [2002] 2007. Listening. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Paine, Garth. 2007. Sonic Immersion: Interactive Engagement in Realtime Immersive Environments. SCAN, Journal of Media Arts and Culture 4 (1). Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  13. Rancière, Jacques. [2008] 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Vouilloux, Bernard. 2008. Du dispositif. In Discours, Image, Dispositif. Penser la Representation II, ed. Philippe Ortel, 15–31. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  15. Winnicott, Donald. [1971] 1991. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar


  1. Finlay, Alec. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  2. ———. A Company of Mountains. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  3. ———. Gathering. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  4. ———. White Peak/Dark Peak. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  5. Fulton, Hamish. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  6. Goldsworthy, Alec. Sheepfolds. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  7. McAdam, Stuart. Lines Lost. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  8. Remote Performances. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  9. Striding Arches. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.
  10. Tuulikki, Hanna. Away With the Birds. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camille Manfredi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NantesNantes Cedex 1France

Personalised recommendations