Advertisement

Sustainability Channels of Business

  • Yonghyup OhEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Finance book series (BRIEFSFINANCE)

Abstract

This chapter is the first step in sustainability valuation. As the contribution of business to the sustainability of society is the key driver of the business value, it illustrates how the society can build its decision-making model of sustainability and derive policy that would best serve to sustainability development of the society. As the way in which business is run may not automatically assure production of positive sustainability, this chapter introduces the concept of sustainability channels which indicate the system that transfers de jure business sustainability into de facto business sustainability. This mechanism induces businesses to get more engaged in creating sustainability of society.

Keywords

Sustainability channels Macromodel of sustainability Policy modeling Sustainability elements Business sustainability Business footprints 

Cited Works

  1. Bell, W. (2009). Foundations of futures studies: Human science for a new era (Vol. 1 and 2). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2014). Sustainability science for strong sustainability. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Keenan, M., Miles, I., & Popper, R. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of technology Foresight—concepts and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  4. Hines, A., & Bishop, P. (Eds.). (2006). Thinking about the future: guidelines for strategic Foresight. Social Technologies LLC: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Inayatullah, S. (1993). From ‘who am I?’ to ‘when am I?’. Futures, 3, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moran, M., Rein, & M.Goodin, R. E., (Eds). (2006). The Oxford handbook of public policy (Vol. 6). Oxford Handbooks of Political.Google Scholar
  7. Neumayer, E. (2013). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms (4th ed.). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Slaughter, R. (1999). Professional standards in futures work. Futures, 31(8), 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilhelm, H. (Ed.). (2011). The I Ching or book of changes.Google Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2012). Policy assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, M., & Hahnel, R. (1990). A quiet revolution in welfare economics. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, J. L., Eggertsson, T., & North, D. C. (1996). Empirical studies in institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergh, C., & Gowdy, J. (2003). The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabezas, H. P. (2005). Sustainable systems theory: Ecological and other aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(5), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabezas, H., Whitmore, H., Pawlowski, C., & Mayer, A. (2007). On the sustainability of an integrated model system with industrial, ecological, and macroeconomic components. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 50(2), 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campante, F. R. (2011). Redistribution in a model of voting and campaign contributions. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 646–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 121, 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castaño, M. S., Méndez, M. T., & Galindo, M. A. (2016). The effect of public policies on entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. Journal of Business Research, 69, 5280–5285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cosme, I., Santos, R., & O’Neill, D. W. (2017). Assessing the degrowth discourse: A review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, D., & Galanis, G. (2017). A Stock-flow-fund ecological macroeconomic model. Ecological Economics, 131, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fankhauser, S., Smith, J. B., & Tol, R. S. J. (1999). Weathering climate change: Some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecological Economics, 30(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuerth, L. S. (2009). Foresight and anticipatory governance. Foresight, 11(4), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Germain, M. (2017). Optimal versus sustainable degrowth policies. Ecological Economics, 136, 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giaoutzi, M., & Sapio, B. (2013). Recent developments in foresight methodologies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graves, P. E. (2017). Global climate policy will have net benefits larger than anyone thinks (and welfare gains, strangely, are likely to be much larger yet). Ecological Economics, 136, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greening, L., Green, D., & Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy, 28, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grindle, M. S. (2011). Governance reform: The new analytics of next steps. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 24(3), 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haegeman, K., Marinelli, E., Scapolo, F., Ricci, A., & Sokolov, A. (2013). Quantitative and qualitative approaches in future-oriented technology analysis (FTA): From combination to integration? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harms, P., & Zink, S. (2003). Limits to redistribution in a democracy: A survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hertwich, E. (2005).Consumption and the rebound effect: An industrial ecology perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hicks, J. R. (1939). The foundations of welfare economics. The Economic Journal, 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hines, A. (2006). Thinking about the future: Guidelines for strategic Foresight. New York: Social Technologies.Google Scholar
  25. Hines, A., & Gold, J. (2013). Professionalizing foresight: Why do it, where it stands, and what needs to be done. Journal of Futures Studies, 17(4), 35–54.Google Scholar
  26. Israel, J. I. (2001). Radical enlightenment: Philosophy and the making of modernity 1650-Mc1750. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, Tim, & Victor, P. A. (2016). Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecological Economics, 121, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, B. R. (2010). The origins of the concept of ‘foresight’ in science and technology: An insider’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1438–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikolova, B. (2014). The rise and promise of participatory foresight. European Journal of Futures Research, 2(33), 2–33.Google Scholar
  31. Nordhaus, W. D., & Tobin, J. (1972). Is Growth Obsolete? In W. D. Nordhaus & J. Tobin (Eds.), Economic research: Retrospect and prospect (Vol. 5). NBER: Cambridge, Massachusettes.Google Scholar
  32. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Massachusettes: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierce, D. W. (1987). Foundations of ecological economics. Ecological Modelling, 38, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Popper, R. (2008). Foresight methodology. In L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena, M. Keenan, I. Miles, & R. Popper (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight—concepts and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  36. Radaelli, C. M. (2005). Diffusion without convergence: How political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 924–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ravetz, J. (1997). The science of what-if? Futures, 29(6), 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rijkens-Klomp, N. (2012). Barriers and levers to future exploration in practice experiences in policy-making. Futures, 44(5), 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, K. B. (2002). Typologies, Taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Studies Journal, 30(3), 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report).
  41. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Werlin, H. H. (2003). Poor nations, rich nations: A Theory of governance. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zerbe, R. O., Jr. (1980). The Problem of social cost in retrospect. Research in Law and Economics, 2, 83–102.Google Scholar
  44. Zhang, C., Chen, W., Liu, G., & Zhu, D. (2017). Economic growth and the evolution of material cycles: An analytical framework integrating material flow and stock indicators. Ecological Economics, 140, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations