Advertisement

Structure of Sustainability Valuation

  • Yonghyup OhEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Finance book series (BRIEFSFINANCE)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of sustainability valuation of business. In this valuation, the value of business is determined by the values of sustainability businesses contribute to the sustainability of society. This is a main departure from conventional valuation methods. It finds a win-win situation between businesses and the sustainability of society, as the value of business would increase only when the business improves the sustainability of society. This chapter introduces key concepts such as de jure and de facto sustainability, describes the sequence of sustainability valuation, and discusses how this method would distinguish itself from other valuation methods.

Keywords

Sustainability valuation De jure sustainability De facto sustainability Win-win situation between business and society 

Cited Works

  1. Ayres, R. U. (1984). Theormodynamics and economics. Physics Today, 37, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen, P. (1987). Classical roots for a modern material-energy analysis. Ecological Modelling, 38, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Copeland, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, J. (1990). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies. Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daly, H. E. (1968). On economics as a life science. Journal of Political Economics, 76, 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. EC COM, 681. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/corporate-social-responsibility_en.
  9. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge M. A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies (4th ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Korhonen, J. H. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. (1976). Energy: Basis for man and nature. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Pierce, D. W. (1987). Foundations of ecological economics. Ecological Modelling, 38, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Randall, A. (1987). Resource economics: An economic approach to natural resource and environmental policy (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Roepke, I. (2004). The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 50, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azzone, G., & Manzini, R. (1994). Measuring strategic environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 3(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheung, S. N. S. (1983). The contractual nature of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady state economics (2nd ed.). Washington, D. C: Island Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, L., & Hopkins, M. (2011). The institutional foundations of inequity and growth. Journal of Development Studies, 47(7), 977–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izqierdo, M. Á., & Rivera-Lirio, J. M. (2017). Measuring corporate environmental performance: a methodology for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gowdy, J. (1997). The value of bio-diversity: Markets, society, and ecosystems. Land Economics, 73, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson, T., & Victor, P. (2016). Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecological Economics, 121, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lietaer, B., Arnsperger, C., Goerner, S., & Brunnhuber, S. (2012). Money and Sustainability: The Missing Link. A report from the Club of Rome. EU Chapter to Finance Watch and the World Business Academy, Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, Norman, & Kirkpatrick, Colin. (2001). Methodologies for sustainability impact assessments of proposals for new trade agreements. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(3), 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2005). Welfare reform and models of public policy: Why policy sciences are required. Review of Policy Research, 22(4), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowi, T. J. (2015). Arenas of power: Reflections on politics and policy. New York: Routeledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Max-Neef, M. (2016). Philosophy of ecological economics. International Journal of Management and Science, 5, 366.Google Scholar
  16. Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van der Belt, M. (1997). The Value of the World’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oh, Y. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and the value of a firm. In R. Schmidpeter (Ed.), International dimensions of sustainable management, CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Switzerland: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
  18. Windolph, E. S., Schaltegger, S., & Herzig, C. (2014). Implementing corporate sustainability: What drives the application of sustainability management tools in Germany? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(4), 378–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations