Environing at the Margins: Huanjing as a Critical Practice

  • Chia-ju Chang
Part of the Chinese Literature and Culture in the World book series (CLCW)


This chapter sketches a field of Chinese Environmental Humanities (CEH). It first outlines the context for the emergence of CEH. Second, it introduces scholarly CEH activities in China and beyond to a global audience. Third, it provides Chinese critical vocabularies and viewpoints. Two keywords, ziran (spontaneity/“self-so-ing” or “nature”) and huanjing (“territory-making” or “environing”), complement each other: while ziran is employed to develop a nondualistic ecological thought, huanjing is reconceptualized as a mode of EH critical inquiry that delves into different cultural, narrative, or aesthetic modes, and politics of environmental inclusion and exclusion. Lastly, it briefly describes each chapter and explains how they engage the huanjing discourse with a correlating “ethics at the margins” that questions the past and present “normative dimensions of current environmental practices.”


  1. Adamson, Joni. 2016. “Introduction: Integrating Knowledge, Forging New Constellations Practice in the Environmental Humanities.” In Humanities for the Environment: Integrating Knowledge, Forging New Constellations of Practice, ed. Joni Adamson and Michael Davis, 3–19. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, Vermonja R. 2016. “Environment.” In Keywords for Environmental Studies, ed. Joni Adamson and William A. Gleason, 93–96. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2003. Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergthaller, Hannes, et al. 2014. “Mapping Common Ground: Ecocriticism, Environmental History, and the Environmental Humanities.” Environmental Humanities 5 (1): 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird, Mike. 2014. “China Just Overtook the US as the World’s Largest Economy.” Business Insider, October 8. Accessed 30 Nov 2018.
  7. Bonneuil, Christophe, and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and US. Trans. David Fernbach. London: Verso Publisher.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, Chia-ju, and Scott Slovic, eds. 2016. Ecocriticism in Taiwan: Identity, Environment, and the Arts. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, Xiangzhan. Autumn 2010. “Ecoaesthetics and Ecocriticism.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 17 (4): 785–789.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy, 60. (Reprinted in Davidson, 2001a.)Google Scholar
  11. Duara, Prasenjit. 2015. The Crisis of Global Modernity: Asian Traditions and a Sustainable Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 1998. “The Critique of Modernity in India and China.” In Across the Himalaya Gap: An India Quest for Understanding China, ed. Tan Chung, 77–89. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts/Gyan Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Elvin, Elvin. 1988. Sediment of Time: Environment and Society in Chinese History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2006. The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Estok, Simon C., and Won-Chung Kim, eds. 2013. East Asian Ecocriticism: A Critical Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Heise, Ursula K. 2014. “Comparative Literature and the Environmental Humanities.” State of the Discipline Support, March 9. Accessed 30 Nov 2018.
  17. Jacques, Martin. 2009. When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  18. Kato, Daniela, and Allen, Bruce. 2014. “Toward an Ecocritical Approach to Translation: A Conceptual Framework.” State of the Discipline Report, March. Accessed 30 Aug 2018.
  19. Liu, Jing. 2016. “What Is Nature?—ziran in Early Daoist Thinking.” Asian Philosophy 26 (3): 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lo, Ren-ling 羅任玲. 2005. Taiwan xiandaishi ziran meixue 台灣現代詩自然美學 (Natural Aesthetics in Modern Taiwan Poetry). Taipei: Erya.Google Scholar
  21. Lu, Sheldon H., and Jiayan Mi, eds. 2009. Chinese Ecocinema: In the Age of Environmental Challenge. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Marks, Robert B. 2017 [2011]. China: Its Environment and History. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Marinelli, Maurizio. 2018. “How to Build a ‘Beautiful China’ in the Anthropocene. The Political Discourse and the Intellectual Debate on Ecological Civilization.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 23 (3): 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, James. 2017. China’s Green Religion: Daoism and the Quest for a Sustainable Future. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naess, Arne. 1995. “The Deep Ecological Movement: Some Philosophical Aspects.” In Deep Ecology for the 21st Century, ed. George Sessions. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Oppermann, Serpil, and Serenella Iovino. 2016. “Introduction: The Environmental Humanities and the Challenges of the Anthropocene.” In Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene, ed. Serpil Oppermann and Serenella Iovino, 1–21. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Pratt, Mary Louise. 2007. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slovic, Scott. 2013. “Landmarks in Chinese Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature: The Emergence of a New Ecological Civilization.” Chinese Social Sciences Today, July 31. Accessed 30 Aug 2018.
  29. Smil, Vaclav. 2017 [1984]. Bad Earth: Environmental Degradation in China. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Sörlin, Sverker. 2012. “Environmental Humanities: Why Should Biologists Interested in the Environment Take the Humanities Seriously?” Bioscience 62 (9/1): 788–789.Google Scholar
  31. Sudilovsky, Judith. 2017. “Faith Leaders Discuss Duty to Protect Rainforests At Interfaith Rainforest Initiative Religious Voices Reinforce the Need to Protect these Vital Resources.” OSVNewsweekly, June 28. Accessed 6 Oct 2018.
  32. Tu, Weiming. 1989. “The Continuity of Being.” In Nature in Asian Traditions of Thought: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, ed. J. Baird Callicott and Roger T. Ames, 67–78. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, Raymond. 2015 [1976]. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chia-ju Chang
    • 1
  1. 1.Brooklyn CollegeBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations