Advertisement

The Nexus Between Economic Development and Environmental Pollution: The Case of Lithuania

  • Lina SinevicieneEmail author
  • Aura Draksaite
  • Violeta Naraskeviciute
  • Oleksandr Kubatko
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 11/1)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to assess a link between economic development and environmental pollution in the case of Lithuania. The research methods used in this research are as follows: systemic, logical and comparative analysis of literature, and statistical methods: descriptive statistics analysis, correlation analysis. Empirical analysis of this study focuses on the data of Lithuanian counties. The study covers 2000–2015 years using annual data. The cross-sectional data of Lithuanian counties showed that the pollution is higher in the higher GDP per capita counties. However, annual data analysis showed that there is a positive tendency in the sustainable development of the counties as there is the evidence that a strong negative correlation between the pollution and economic development exists in the majority of Lithuanian counties. It means that the decrease of pollution is related to the growth of economic development or vice versa.

Keywords

Economic development Sustainability Environmental pollution Lithuania 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by a grant (No. TAP LU-4-2016) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

References

  1. Akbostanci, E., Turut-Asik, S., & Tunc, G. I. (2008). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(3), 861–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowden, N., & Payne, J. E. (2009). The causal relationship between US energy consumption and real output: A disaggregated analysis. Policy Model, 31, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandran, V. G. R., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cialani, C. (2007). Economic growth and environmental quality: An econometric and a decomposition analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 18(5), 568–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Groot, H., Withagen, C., & Minliang, Z., (2002). Dynamics of China’s regional development and pollution (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2001–036–3).Google Scholar
  6. Erol, U., & Yu, E. S. H. (1998). On the causal relationship between energy and income for industrialized countries. Energy Development, 13, 113–122.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2014). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Green Employment Initiative: Tapping into the job creation potential of the green economy/∗ COM/2014/0446 final ∗/, [online]. Accessed January 10, 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0446
  8. European Commission. (2010). EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth/∗ COM/2010/2020 final ∗/ [online]. Accessed January 10, 2018, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014DC0446
  9. Haggar, M. H. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics, 34, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang, Y. H., & Yoo, S. H. (2014). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: Evidence from Indonesia. Quality & Quantity, 48, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacheheb, M., Rahim, A. S. A., & Sirag, A. (2015). Economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Algeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(4), 1125–1132.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, C. (2006). The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries revisited. Energy Policy, 34, 1086–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, C., & Chien, M. (2010). Dynamic modelling of energy consumption, capital stock, and real income in G-7 countries. Energy Economics, 32, 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo, Y., Chen, H., Zhu, Q., Peng, C., Yang, G., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Relationship between air pollutants and economic development of the provincial capital cities in China during the past decade. PLoS One, 9(8), e104013.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries, new evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30, 2331–2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ozcan, B. (2013). The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 62, 1138–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., & Tahir, M. I. (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: Fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2003). Energy consumption and GDP: Causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets. Energy Economics, 25, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. The Lithuanian Department of Statistics. (2017). [online]. Accessed October 15, 2017, from https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize#/
  20. Wesseh, P. K., & Zoumara, B. (2012). Causal independence between energy consumption and economic growth in Liberia: Evidence from a non-parametric bootstrapped causality test. Energy Policy, 50, 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yevdokimov, Y. V., Melnyk, L. G., & Kubatko, O. V. (2011). The environmental Kuznets curve and regional convergence in Ukraine. International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics, 22, 72–86.Google Scholar
  22. Zeng, L., Xu, M., Liang, S., Zeng, S., & Zhang, T. (2014). Revisiting drivers of energy intensity in China during 1997–2007: A structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy, 67, 640–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lina Sineviciene
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aura Draksaite
    • 1
  • Violeta Naraskeviciute
    • 1
  • Oleksandr Kubatko
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Economics and BusinessKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Business AdministrationSumy State UniversitySumyUkraine

Personalised recommendations