Advertisement

Mathematical Modeling in Innovation

  • D. SolovevEmail author
  • T. Shkarina
  • O. Chudnova
  • S. Kuzora
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)

Abstract

This article describes mathematical modeling as a tool to substantiate managerial decisions in innovation, as well as the pros and cons of using it in modern economics. In the context of the current problems associated with the arrangement of innovation activities, it is proposed to focus on promotion measures for potential participants. The paper determines the criterion/weight ratio to score the effectiveness of promotion. Research has been carried out into the use of mathematical modeling to predict the number of participants needed to be engaged in innovation. The paper demonstrates a successful verification of the mathematical model on the data from the Skolkovo Far-East companies. This research could be of interest to professionals involved in the organization of innovation.

Keywords

Innovation assessment Mathematical modeling Innovation processes Innovation forecasts 

References

  1. 1.
    Shterenzon, V.A.: Modeling of technological processes. Publishing House Ros. state Prof.-ped. Un-ta, 66 p. (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuznetsov, V.V., Krajnyukov, A.N.: The concept of innovative development on the basis of a systems approach. Innovative activity, № 4 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dynkin, A., Ivanov, N.I.: Innovative Economy. M.: Science, 2nd edn. (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soloviev, D.B., Kuzora, S.S., Merkusheva A.E.: Mathematical model for evaluating the effectiveness of an innovation hub. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions, № 3 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soloviev, D.B., Kuzora, S.S., Merkusheva, A.E.: Using Fuzzy Inference Algorithms for Preliminary Assessment of Participants in the Cluster Approach. Innovations, № 5 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sergeev, V.M., Alekseenkova, E.S., Nechaev, V.D.: Typology of innovation development models. Politiya, № 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hakkarainen, K.: The innovation funnel fallacy. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 6, 63–72 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonazzi, F., Zilber, M.: Innovation and business model: a review of business management, vol. 16, no. 53, pp. 616–637 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coenen, T., Ranaivoson, H., Ballon, P.: Tool support for the Open Business Model Innovative funnel. In: Conference Paper, vol. 1 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bris, G., Yannou, B., Attias, D.: A conference of agility and permeability. In: Conference Paper (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zverev, A.V.: State support of innovation activity. Bulletin of financial university, № 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shchepina, I.N.: Innovative activity at the regional level: types of behavior of regions and their stability. Publishing and Printing Center of the Voronezh State University (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shatunova, Yu.V.: State regulation of innovation activity. KSAA them. I. Ivanov, № 3 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Itskovits, G.V.: Model triple helix. Innovative Russia, № 4 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dezhina, I.G., Kiseleva, V.V.: Institute for the economy in transition. State, Science and Business in the Innovation System of Russia (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kozlova, Zh.M.: Problems of the formation of the national innovation system in Russia. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Melnikov, O.N., Shuvalov, V.N.: Innovative activity as a factor in improving the competitiveness of an enterprise. Russian J. Entrepreneurship № 9 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leonenkov, A.V.: Fuzzy modeling in the MATLAB environment and fuzzyTECH. SPb.: BHV-Petersburg, 736 p. (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shtovba, S.D.: Design of fuzzy systems using MATLAB. M.: Hotline – Telecom (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laekio, C.B., Rodney, C.B., Weldon, L.: Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Theory and Applications (2016). ISBN: 978-3-662-53322-2Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sodiya, A.S., Onashoga, S.A., Oladunjoye, B.A.: Threat modeling using fuzzy logic paradigm. Issues in informing Science and Information Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zadeh, L.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to making approximate decisions. M.: Mir, 166 p. (1976)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mamdani, E., Assilian, S.: An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 7, 1–13 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 116–132 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsukamoto, Y.: An Approach to the Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, pp. 137–149. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1979)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gorkavy, M.A., Gorkavy, A.I.: Intellectual systems in the management of technical and organizational-technological processes. Komsomolsk-on-Amur: FGBOU VO “KnAGTU”, 117 p. (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andina, D., Fukushima, K.: neuroengineering: from neurosciences to computations. Int. J. Neural Syst. 28(5), 1803001 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129065718030016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    The Far Eastern Representative Office of the Skolkovo Foundation. http://sk.ru/foundation/fareast/
  30. 30.
    Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU). https://www.dvfu.ru
  31. 31.
    Solovev, D.B.: Experimental data based current transformer mathematical simulation in micro-cap program. Int. Rev. Electr. Eng. (IREE) 13(2), 149–156 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v13i2.13380CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Far Eastern Federal UniversityVladivostokRussia
  2. 2.Vladivostok Branch of Russian Customs AcademyVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations