Advertisement

Fractal Approach to the Development Strategies of Enterprises

  • L. V. Bykasova
  • E. A. Bogomolova
  • I. V. Gorelova
  • M. R. Arpentieva
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)

Abstract

This article is devoted to consideration of a number of terminological and methodological aspects of the strategic diagnostic of the enterprise. Available to the fractal approach to the formation and diagnostic strategies, based on an analysis of the elementary fractal strategy. Existing approaches to the formation of the strategy can be systematized according to the following criteria: the logic of the strategy; target setting strategy; cognitive strategy setting; scale of tasks to be solved; method of obtaining and appropriating economic rent; the basis of competitive advantage. The most popular method for explaining the features and the mechanism of strategy development is now the resource approach, which, when building the appropriate methodology for the formation and diagnostics of the strategy, makes it possible to address the strategic potential of the economic entity. The main task of strategic diagnostics is to identify possible alternatives to development management. The resulting strategic management alternatives are a combination of the elements of a set of strategies at different fractal levels. Analysis of the obtained alternatives is advisable to begin with an elementary fractal strategy. The advantage of using this model is that in this case it is possible to exclude non-feasible from the position of goals and objectives of the state strategy of alternatives at the early stages of its development - at the level of analysis of managerial and organizational processes, “positions on assets”, development trajectories. Or, on the contrary, it is possible to “correct” the elementary fractal of the strategy, namely, to make all three of its components hypostasis - administrative and organizational processes, positions on assets, development trajectory, corresponding to each other. The second way can be less expensive.

Keywords

Model System Resources approach Fractal theory Strategy Methodology 

References

  1. 1.
    Arpentieva, M.R.: Evergetic: management ontology. In: Social Science and Humanity, vol. 3, pp. 192–210. SCIEURO, London (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arpentieva, M.R.: Intersubjective technologies of the state management. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “InterCarto/InterGIS”, vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 19–26 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arpentieva, M.R., Duvalina, O.N., Gorelova, I.V.: Intersubjective management in aerospace engineering. In: Borikov, V., Uchaikin, S., Baranov, P., Ivanova, V., Dolgih, A., Ignatovskaya, A. (eds.) 5th International Forum for Young Scientists “Space Engineering”. MATEC Web of Conferences, National Instruments Russia Corporation, Tomsk, 12–14 April 2017, vol. 102, p. 1002 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arpentieva, M.R.: Foresight and the dynamic capabilities of enterprises. Eur. J. Manag. Issues 25(1), 10–17 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.15421/191702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gorelova, I.V.: Fractal approach to the formation of strategies in object-type systems: monograph. Volgograd Branch of the Russian Academy of Science and Technology, Volgograd (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gorelova, I.V.: Methods and tools for diagnosing the strategy of an industrial enterprise. Dissertation Ph.D. in economy. Volgograd State University, Volgograd (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolbachev, E.B.: Economic Essence of Fractal Properties of Production, Systems and Ensuring Their Integrity. http://www.bogdinst.ru. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
  8. 8.
    Lewin, R.: Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loveridge, D.: Foresight: The Art and Science of Anticipating the Future. Routledge, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meadows, D.H.: Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W.A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S.R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Ness, E.H., Rietkerk, M., Sugihara, G.: Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chekhov Taganrog Institute (Branch)Rostov State Economic UniversityTaganrog, Rostov RegionRussian Federation
  2. 2.Tsiolkovskiy Kaluga State UniversityKalugaRussian Federation
  3. 3.Volgograd Institute of Management, a Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationVolgogradRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations