Advertisement

Species and Provenance Testing of Western USA Species

  • C. J. A. Shelbourne
Chapter

Abstract

Western North America, including coastal British Columbia, was a source of many useful species. These included the two closed cone pines, P. attenuata and P. muricata, Pseudotsuga menziesii, P. ponderosa, P. contorta, Sequoia sempervirens, S. gigantea and Picea sitchensis. Thuja plicata and Tsuga heterophylla were interesting but less tested. P. muricata grew well with good form, was foliage resistant to Dothistroma, but was never adopted as a radiata substitute. Pseudotsuga menziesii, Douglas-fir, is the major additional and alternative species to radiata. P. ponderosa was almost wiped out by Dothistroma but would never have been a rival to radiata. All these species showed strong, sometimes massive provenance differences which were usually well demonstrated in the provenance trials.

Keywords

Attenuata Muricata Ponderosa Contorta Menziesii Sitchensis 

References

  1. 15. I.J. Thulin 1963 Provenance trials of Pinus attenuata. Establishment reportGoogle Scholar
  2. M.P. Bollman 1966: The height growth of a provenance trial in Pinus attenuata in Kaingaroa Forest Cpt 905.Google Scholar
  3. H.S. Dungey, C.B. Low, N.J. Ledgard & G.T. Stovold 2011: Alternatives to Pinus radiata in the New Zealand high country: early growth and survival of P. radiata, P. attenuata and their F1 hybrid. NZJFS 41:61-69Google Scholar
  4. 62. C.J.A. Shelbourne, J.A. Zabkiewicz and P.A. Allan 1973: Monoterpene composition in provenances of Pinus muricata planted in New Zealand.Google Scholar
  5. 63. C.J.A. Shelbourne 1973: Recent investigations of wood properties and growth performance in 'blue strain' Pinus muricata. NZ J. For. 19(1):13-45 1974Google Scholar
  6. 40/6939 C.J.A. Shelbourne 1974: Pinus muricata provenance variation in height and state of flushing of the terminal bud, 18 months from sowingGoogle Scholar
  7. 147/7052 C.J.A. Shelbourne 1976? Two year heights of 35 wind-pollinated progenies of P. muricataGoogle Scholar
  8. 180/7091 M.D. Wilcox, C.B. Low and M.H. Bannister 1978: Assessment at age 6 years of the Pinus muricata gene pool experiment at Rotoehu forest.Google Scholar
  9. R1312. C.J.A. Shelbourne, M.H. Bannister and M.D. Wilcox 1982: Early results of provenance studies on Pinus muricata in New Zealand. NZ J. For. 27(1): 50-66.Google Scholar
  10. 24. I.J. Thulin, J.T. Miller 1966: Provenance trials of Pinus contorta planted from 1958-1961; Establishment report.Google Scholar
  11. 27/6926 J.W. Hignett 1971: Provenance variation in height and wood density in Pinus contortaGoogle Scholar
  12. 118/7025 J.T. Miller 1976: Assessment of Pinus contorta provenance trials at Tara Hills.Google Scholar
  13. 38. J.T. Miller 1968: The genetic improvement of Pinus contorta in New Zealand.Google Scholar
  14. 55. J.T. Miller 1971: Provenance variation in growth rate and other characters in 6-year-old Pinus contorta.Google Scholar
  15. R. 993. C.J.A. Shelbourne and J.T. Miller 1976: Provenance variation in Pinus contorta. 6-year results from IUFRO seedlots in New Zealand. IUFRO XVI IUFRO World Congress Norway 1976. Proc. Div. II:140-145.Google Scholar
  16. 192/7118 O. Mohrdiek and J.T. Miller 1980: Five year assessment of open-pollinated progeny tests in Pinus contorta.Google Scholar
  17. 9. G.B. Sweet and M.P. Bollman 1962: Provenance trial in Pinus ponderosa: A combined establishment and first assessment report.Google Scholar
  18. 40. I.J. Thulin and M.D. Wilcox 1970: Ponderosa pine provenance trials (1960-61). Establishment reportGoogle Scholar
  19. 47. M.D. Wilcox 1970: Ponderosa pine provenance trials (1960-61) assessment six years after planting (1967).Google Scholar
  20. R.D. Burdon and C.B. Low 1991: Performance of Pinus ponderosa and Pinus jeffreyi provenances in New Zealand. Can. J. For. Res. 21:1401-1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. R. 2115. J.T. Miller and C.J.A. Shelbourne 1984: Sitka spruce provenance trials in New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  22. R. 2621. R.D. Burdon and J.T. Miller 1995: Alternative species revisited: categorisation and issues for strategy and research. NZ Forestry Aug. 1995.Google Scholar
  23. IR 83 PROPPS 718 J.T. Miller 1978: Species provenance trials of Sierra Redwood: establishment and first assessment.Google Scholar
  24. PDF 21243 in SIDNEY same number. W.J. Libby 1999: Observations of Giant Sequoia on South Island New Zealand.J.M. Fielding 1961: Provenances of Monterey and Bishop pines. For. Tim. Bur. Aust. No 38.Google Scholar
  25. Wilcox (1993) NZ Forestry 38 (3) article, ‘Priorities for research on alternative tree species for wood production in NZ’. Aust. Bull. No. 11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. A. Shelbourne
    • 1
  1. 1.RotoruaNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations