Advertisement

Vernacular Makynge, Jack Upland, and the Aesthetics of Antifraternalism

  • Noëlle Phillips
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

Late medieval English polemical poetic and prose texts, particularly those affiliated with Lollardy, have long been judged as aesthetically unappealing even as they are acknowledged to be historically, politically, and socially illuminating. They are important documents, but not beautiful literature. This chapter considers how we might understand these texts as emerging from an aesthetic tradition that turns away from tradition Aristotelian models of artistic beauty and toward a model of vernacular aesthetics. Through a review of English poetic precedent, this chapter argues that the notion of vernacular makynge offers an alternate way to understand the aesthetic patterns of one particular group of late medieval polemical texts: the fifteenth-century Jack Upland series. The chapter’s analysis of Jack Upland, Friar Daw’s Reply, and Upland’s Rejoinder explores how the features of makynge—performance, process, transformation—actually align with Lollard beliefs about artistic skill and open up our understanding of these texts whose literary value continues to be overlooked.

Bibliography

  1. Barthes, Roland. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Burrow, J.A. 1993. Langland’s Fictions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon, Christopher. 2014. From Literacy to Literature: Elementary Learning and the Middle English Poet. PMLA 129: 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carruthers, Mary. 2013. The Experience of Beauty in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cattley, Stephen Reed, ed. 1837. The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, Volume 2. London: Seeley & Burnside.Google Scholar
  6. Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1987. In The Riverside Chaucer, ed. Larry D. Benson, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton.Google Scholar
  7. Clanchy, Michael. 1993. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, Andrew. 2008. Literature and Heresy in the Age of Chaucer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crane, Susan. 1999. Anglo-Norman Cultures in England. In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, ed. David Wallace, 167–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dean, James. 1991. Six Ecclesiastical Satires. Medieval Institute Publications. http://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/publication/dean-six-ecclesiastical-satires. Accessed 8 Jan 2017.
  11. Dumitrescu, Irina. 2017. Beautiful Suffering and the Culpable Narrator in Chaucer’s Legend of Good Women. The Chaucer Review 52 (1): 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durbin, Paul. 2006. Summa Theologiae: Volume 12, Human Intelligence: 1a.84–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eco, Umberto. 1987. Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages. Trans. Hugh Bredin. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Garforth, F.W. 1967. Bede’s Historia Ecclesiastica: A Selection. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  15. Ginsberg, Warren. 1992. Wynnere and Wastoure. Ann Arbor: Medieval Institute Publications. http://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/text/ginsberg-wynnere-and-wastoure. Accessed 8 Jan 2017.
  16. Hammond, Eleanor, ed. 1969. English Verse between Chaucer and Surrey. London: Octagon.Google Scholar
  17. Hanna, Ralph. 1997. Will’s Work. In Written Work: Langland, Labor, and Authorship, ed. Steven Justice and Kathryn Kerby-Fulton, 23–66. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. Helbert, Daniel. 2016. ‘Þa þre boc þrumde to are’: Beating Books Together in Laȝamon’s Brut. Presentation at the Making Early Middle English: An International Conference on English Literature and Its Contexts, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, September.Google Scholar
  19. Heyworth, P.L. 1967. Jack Upland’s Rejoinder, a Lollard Interpolator and Piers Plowman B.X.249f. Medium Aevum 36: 242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 1968. Jack Upland, Friar Daw’s Reply, and Upland’s Rejoinder. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Holsinger, Bruce. 2005. Lollard Ekphrasis: Situated Aesthetics and Literary History. The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 35 (1): 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2007. The Parable of Caedmon’s ‘Hymn’: Liturgical Invention and Literary Tradition. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 106 (2): 149–175.Google Scholar
  23. Hornbeck, Patrick. Antifraternalism and the Upland Series: Evidence from a Fifteenth-Century Ballad. Notes and Queries 56 (1): 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Illig, Jennifer. 2017. Preparing for Easter: Sermons on the Eucharist in English Wycliffite Sermons. In Europe after Wyclif, Fordham Series in Medieval Studies, 247–264. New York: Fordham University.Google Scholar
  25. Jane, L.C, Trans. 1903. Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation (Temple Classics Edition). https://www.heorot.dk/caedmon-notes.html#li
  26. Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn. 1997. Langland and the Bibliographic Ego. In Written Work: Langland, Labor, and Authorship, ed. Steven Justice and Kathryn Kerby-Fulton, 67–143. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lambdin, Laura C., and Robert T. Lambdin. 2007. Arthurian Writers: A Biographical Encyclopedia. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  28. Lawton, David. 1981. Lollardy and the ‘Piers Plowman’ Tradition. The Modern Language Review 76 (4): 780–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 1987. Dullness and the Fifteenth Century. ELH 54 (4): 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Middle English Dictionary. 2006. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/
  31. Middleton, Anne. 1982. Narration and the Invention of Experience: Episodic Form in Piers Plowman. In The Wisdom of Poetry: Essays in Early English Literature in Honor of Morton W. Bloomfield, ed. Larry Benson and Siegfried Wenzel, 91–122. Ann Arbor: Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1997. Acts of Vagrancy: The C Version ‘Autobiography’ and the Statute of 1388. In Written Work: Langland, Labor, and Authorship, ed. Steven Justice and Kathryn Kerby-Fulton Justice, 208–318. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moo, Douglas. 2009. The Letter of James. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  34. Nolan, Maura. 2013. Medieval Sensation and Modern Aesthetics: Aquinas, Adorno, Chaucer. Minnesota Review 80: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nyffenegger, Nicole. 2013. Authorising History: Gestures of Authorship in Fourteenth-Century English Historiography. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, Glending. 1979. Making and Poetry in the Age of Chaucer. Comparative Literature 31 (3): 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, Noëlle. 2011. Families, Fictions, and Seeing Through Things: Re-Reading Chaucer, Langland, and the Pearl Poet. PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  38. Reichl, Karl. 2014. The Oral and the Written. In A Companion to British Literature, ed. Robert DeMaria et al., 1–15. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Rouse, Richard, and Mary Rouse. 1987. The Franciscan and Books: Lollard Accusations and the Franciscan Response. Studies in Church History Subsidia 5: 409–424.Google Scholar
  40. Scase, Wendy. 1989. Piers Plowman and the New Anti-Clericalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scattergood, John. 2010. Alliterative Poetry and Politics. In A Companion to Medieval Poetry, ed. Corinne Saunders, 349–366. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, James. 2002. The Oxford English Literary History, Volume 2, 1350–1547: Reform and Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Smeeton, Donald Dean. 1986. Lollard Themes in the Reformation Theology of William Tyndale. Kirksville: Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Stackhouse, I. 1994. The Native Roots of Early English Reformation Theology. Evangelical Quarterly 66 (1): 19–35.Google Scholar
  45. Steinberg, Charles. 1941. The Aesthetic Theory of St. Thomas Aquinas. The Philosophical Review 50 (5): 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stock, Brian. 1983. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Swanson, Robert. 1995. Religion and Devotion in Europe, c. 1215 – c. 1515. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tatlock, John S.P. 1921. The Epilog of Chaucer’s ‘Troilus’. Modern Philology 18 (12): 625–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Uhart, Marie-Claire. 1986. The Early Reception of Piers Plowman. PhD Dissertation, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  50. Vargas, Michael. 2011. Weak Obedience, Undisciplined Friars, and Failed Reforms in the Medieval Order of Preachers. Viator 32 (1): 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wyclif, John. 1880. In The English Works of Wyclif Hitherto Unprinted, ed. F.D. Matthew. London: Early English Text Society, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
  52. Zeeman, Nicolette. 2006. Piers Plowman and the Medieval Discourse of Desire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noëlle Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Douglas CollegeVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations