Advertisement

Online Gaming: Casino, Lotteries, and Gambling

  • Fausto Martin De Sanctis
Chapter

Abstract

Preventing the crime of gaming through Internet, either casino-style games or lotteries or gambling, requires an analysis of the roles of each actor in this activity, which can be considered illegal when it “legalizes” gains from criminal activities. The chapter shows that public policies challenges require a consideration of it is widely available and used and there is differing regulatory models.

Keywords

Online gaming activity Casino-style games Lotteries Gambling Public policies Regulatory treatment 

References

  1. 1.
    Glenny, M. (2008). McMaffia: Crime sem fronteiras (p. 14). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller, K. C. (2013). Public policy and the inevitability of internet gambling. Drake Law Review Discourse, 61, 1–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Financial Action Task Force. (2009, Mar). Financial Action Task Force – FATF website. Vulnerabilities of casinos and gaming sector. Retrieved August 10, 2018, from http://www.fatf-gafi.org/mwg-internal/de5fs23hu73dsw/progress?id=g0bbqv2M5r
  4. 4.
    Kindt, J. W., & Joy, S. W. (2002). Internet gambling and the destabilization of national and international economies: Time for a comprehensive ban on gambling over the world wide web. Denver University Law Review, 80, 111.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Financial Action Task Force. Money laundering through the football sector report. Last updated February 1, 2012, Retrieved May 10, 2018, from http://www.fatf-gafi.org/topics/methodsandtrends/documents/moneylaunderingthroughthefootballsector.html
  6. 6.
    Conselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras – COAF. Brazilian Intelligence Unit, COAF website, Retrieved August 08, 2018, from https://siscoaf.discovery.fazenda.gov.br/coaf/servlet/mstrWeb?src=mstrWeb.3140&evt=3140&documentID=8DC8B1DD11E72FF300000080EF756E0B&Server=161.148.236.17&Port=0&Project=DD-COAF&
  7. 7.
    Sales of lotteries in the United States, in the Statistics Portal. Retrieved August 10, 2018, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/388238/sales-of-lotteries-by-state-us/
  8. 8.
    Lim, H. Y. F. (2011). Online gaming. The state of play in Singapore. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 23, 74–92.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Betting USA site. Retrieved June 20, 2018, from http://www.bettingusa.com/lottery/
  10. 10.
    Delpierre, H. M (2018). Du blanchiment d’argent au trucage de matches. Paris en ligne: les mafias truquent le jeu. Dernières Nouvelles D’Alsace (DNA). Retrieved August 10, 2018, from http://www.dna.fr/justice/2012/04/27/les-mafias-truquent-le-jeu
  11. 11.
    Kern, P. The fight against corruption in sport is a major European issue. EurActiv.com. Retrieved August 10, 2018, from http://www.euractiv.com/culture/fight-corruption-sport-major-eur-analysis-515227
  12. 12.
    European Commission. White Paper on Sport. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/sport/white-paper/swd-the-organisation-of-sport_en.htm
  13. 13.
    Abovitz, I. (2008). Why the United States should rethink its legal approach to internet gambling: A comparative analysis of regulatory models that have been successfully implemented in foreign jurisdictions. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 22, 437.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blankenship, M. (2008). The unlawful internet gambling enforcement act: A bad gambling act? You Betcha! Rutgers Law Review, 60, 485.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bana, A. (2011). Online gambling: An appreciation of legal issues. International Business Law Journal, 12, 335.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mills, J., et al. (2000). Dickinson Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 19, 77.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schopper, M. D. (2002). Internet gambling, electronic cash & money laundering: The unintended consequences of a monetary control scheme. Chapman Law Review, 5, 303–330.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gottfried, J. (2004). The federal framework for internet gambling. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 10(3), 26.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reeves, L. (2013). From Chance to Ka-Ching: A Model for Legalization and Agency Regulation of Internet Gambling in Texas. Texas Tech Administrative Law Journal, 14, 487–506.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fausto Martin De Sanctis
    • 1
  1. 1.3rd RegionFederal Court of AppealsSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations