Advertisement

Ecosystem-Based Economic Modelers of Climate Change

  • S. Niggol Seo
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a review and discussions of the models of ecosystem changes induced by climate change as well as the ecosystem-based economic impact models. First, the global land cover database for climate studies constructed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) team and other satellite-based ecosystem data are explained. The land cover data are illustrated by the South American land cover map. Second, the Agro-Ecological Zone (AEZ) classification for suitability of crop agriculture developed by the international agricultural organizations is explained. The distributions of the AEZs across the African continent are illustrated. This chapter then critically reviews the ecosystem-based economic impact studies that rely on the AEZ methodology. The fundamental drawbacks of the AEZ-based economic impact methodology are highlighted through the methodology’s failure of identification of agricultural activities in each AEZ as well as the failure to capture behavioral responses such as selection, diversification, and integration.

Keywords

Climate change Ecosystem Global land cover Agro-Ecological Zones Economic impacts 

References

  1. Adams R, McCarl BA, Segerson K, Rosenzweig C, Bryant K, Dixon BL, Conner R, Evenson RE, Ojima D (1999) The economic effects of climate change on US agriculture. In: Mendelsohn R, Neumann J (eds) The impact of climate change on the United States economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Baethgen WE (1997) Vulnerability of agricultural sector of Latin America to climate change. Clim Res 9:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crowther TW, Glick HB, Covey KR et al (2015) Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, Lohmann U, Ramachandran S, da Silva Dias PL, Wofsy SC, Zhang X (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: Evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97:354–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudal R (1980) Soil-related constraints to agricultural development in the tropics. International Rice Research Institute, Los BanosGoogle Scholar
  7. Easterling WE, Aggarwal PK, Batima P, Brander KM, Erda L, Howden SM, Kirilenko A, Morton J, Soussana J-F, Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Food, fibre and forest products. In: Parry ML et al (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. The fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. FAO (2005) Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the twenty-first century (CD-ROM), FAO Land and Water Digital Media Series. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO/International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) (2012) Global agro-ecological zones (GAEZ v3.0): Model documentation. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer G, Frohberg K, Keyzer MA, Parikh KS (1988) Linked national models: A tool for international policy analysis. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer G, Shah M, Tubiello FN, van Velhuizen H (2005) Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: An integrated assessment, 1990–2080. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:2067–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischlin A, Midgley GF, Price JT, Leemans R, Gopal B, Turley C, Rounsevell MDA, Dube OP, Tarazona J, Velichko AA (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods, and services. In: Parry ML et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. The fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1978) Report on agro-ecological zones vol. 1: Methodology and results for Africa. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Gitay H, Brwon S, Easterling W, Jallow B (2001) Ecosystems and their goods and services. In: McCarthy JJ et al (eds) Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptations, and vulnerabilities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2011) Governing instrument for the green climate fund. GCF, Songdo CityGoogle Scholar
  16. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018a) Annex III: Investment framework. GCF, Songdo CityGoogle Scholar
  17. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018b) Annex IX: Results management framework. GCF, Songdo CityGoogle Scholar
  18. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018c) Projects + programmes. GCF, Songdo City. Accessed from https://www.greenclimate.fund/what-we-do/projects-programmes Google Scholar
  19. Groves T (1973) Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41:617–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart O, Holmstrom B (1987) The theory of contracts. In: Bewley T (ed) Advances in economics and econometrics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Hillel D, Rosenzweig C (eds) (2010) Handbook of climate change and agroecosystems: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Houghton RA (2008) Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850–2005. In: Trends: A compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1990) Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) (2000) Delivering the African development potential: The IITA vision. IITA, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R, Hassan R, Benhin J, Diop M, Eid HM, Fosu KY, Gbetibouo G, Jain S, Mahamadou A, El-Marsafawy S, Ouda S, Ouedraogo M, Sène I, Maddision D, Seo SN, Dinar A (2006) Will African agriculture survive climate change? World Bank Econ Rev 20:367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Mata LJ, Campos M (2001) Latin America. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. The third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthews E (1983) Global vegetation and land use: new high-resolution data bases for climatestudies. J Climatol Appl Meteorol 22(3):474–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2018) Missions: Earth Observing System (EOS). NASA, Washington, DC. Accessed from https://eospso.nasa.gov/mission-category/3 Google Scholar
  30. National Research Council (NRC) (2013) Abrupt impacts of climate change: Anticipating surprises. Committee on understanding and monitoring abrupt climate change and its impacts. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Nordhaus W (2006) Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(10):3510–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nordhaus WD (2008) A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  33. Parry ML, Rosenzweig CP, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socioeconomic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peters CM, Gentry AW, Mendelsohn RO (1989) Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339(6227):655–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rabatel A, Francou B, Soruco A, Gomez J, Caceres B, Ceballos JL, Basantes R, Buille M, Sicart JE, Huggel C, Scheel M, Lejeune Y, Arnaud Y, Collet M, Condom T, Consoli G, Favier V, Jomelli V, Galarraga R, Ginot P, Maisincho L, Mendoza J, Menegoz M, Ramirez E, Ribstein P, Suarez W, Villacis M, Wagnon P (2013) Current state of glaciers in the tropical Andes: A multi-century perspective on glacier evolution and climate change. Cryosphere 7:81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenzweig C, Parry M (1994) Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenzweig C, Allen LH, Harper LA, Hollinger SE, Jones JW (eds) (1995) Climate change and agriculture: Analysis of potential international impacts. American Society of Agronomy (ASA) Special Publication No. 59. ASA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  38. Schenkler W, Hanemann M, Fisher A (2006) The impact of global warming on U.S. agriculture: An econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions. Rev Econ Stat 88(1):113–125Google Scholar
  39. Schlenker W, Roberts M (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(37):15594–15598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlesinger WH (1991) Biogeochemistry: An analysis of global change. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmitz OJ, Wilmers CC, Leroux SJ, Doughty CE, Atwood TB, Galetti M, Davies AB, Goetz SJ (2018) Animals and the zoogeochemistry of the carbon cycle. Science 362.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seo SN (2010a) A microeconometric analysis of adapting portfolios to climate change: Adoption of agricultural systems in Latin America. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 32:489–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seo SN (2010b) Managing forests, livestock, and crops under global warming: A micro-econometric analysis of land use changes in Africa. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 54:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seo SN (2011) A geographically scaled analysis of adaptation to climate change with spatial models using agricultural systems in Africa. J Agric Sci 149:437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seo SN (2012a) Adapting natural resource enterprises under global warming in South America: A mixed logit analysis. Economia: J Lat Am Caribb Econ Assoc 12:111–135Google Scholar
  46. Seo SN (2012b) Adaptation behaviors across ecosystems under global warming: a spatial microeconometric model of the rural economy in South America. Pap Reg Sci 91:849–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seo SN (2012c) Decision making under climate risks: An analysis of sub-Saharan farmers’ adaptation behaviors. Weather Clim Soc 4:285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seo SN (2013) Refining spatial resolution and spillovers of a microeconometric model of adapting portfolios to climate change. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 18:1019–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seo SN (2014a) Evaluation of agro-ecological zone methods for the study of climate change with micro farming decisions in sub-Saharan Africa. Eur J Agron 52:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seo SN (2014b) Coupling climate risks, eco-systems, anthropogenic decisions using South American and Sub-Saharan farming activities. Meteorol Appl 21:848–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seo SN (2014c) Adapting sensibly when global warming turns the field brown or blue: A comment on the 2014 IPCC Report. Econ Aff 34:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seo SN (2015a) Micro-behavioral economics of global warming: Modeling adaptation strategies in agricultural and natural resource enterprises. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  53. Seo SN (2015b) Adapting to extreme climates: raising animals in hot and arid ecosystems in Australia. Int J Biometeorol 59:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seo SN (2015c) Helping low-latitude, poor countries with climate change. Regulation. Winter 2015–2016: 6–8Google Scholar
  55. Seo SN (2016a) Microbehavioral econometric methods: Theories, models, and applications for the study of environmental and natural resources. Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  56. Seo SN (2016b) Modeling farmer adaptations to climate change in South America: A micro-behavioral economic perspective. Environ Ecol Stat 23:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seo SN (2016c) Untold tales of goats in deadly Indian monsoons: Adapt or rain-retreat under global warming? J Extrem Events.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737616500019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seo SN (2016d) The micro-behavioral framework for estimating total damage of global warming on natural resource enterprises with full adaptations. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 21:328–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seo SN (2017) The behavioral economics of climate change: adaptation behaviors, global public goods, breakthrough technologies, and policy-making. Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  60. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008a) A Ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change impacts on South American farms. Chilean J Agric Res 68:69–79Google Scholar
  61. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008b) Measuring impacts and adaptations to climate change: A structural Ricardian model of African livestock management. Agric Econ 38:151–165Google Scholar
  62. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008c) An analysis of crop choice: Adapting to climate change in South American farms. Ecol Econ 67:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Hassan R, Kurukulasuriya P (2008) Differential adaptation strategies of African cropland across Agro-Ecological Zones. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4601. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  64. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Hassan R, Kurukulasuriya P (2009) A Ricardian analysis of the distribution of climate change impacts on agriculture across agro-ecological zones in Africa. Environ Resour Econ 43:313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Seo SN, McCarl B, Mendelsohn R (2010) From beef cattle to sheep under global warming? An analysis of adaptation by livestock species choice in South America. Ecol Econ 69:2486–2494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steiger C (2006) Modern beef production in Brazil and Argentina. Choices 21:105–110Google Scholar
  67. Thomas N, Nigam S (2018) Twentieth-century climate change over Africa: Seasonal hydroclimate trends and Sahara Desert expansion. J Clim 39:3349–3370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Titley DW, Hegerl G, Jacobs KL, Mote PW, Paciorek CJ, Shepherd JM, Shepherd TG, Sobel AH, Walsh J, Zwiers FW, Thomas K, Everett L, Purcell A, Gaskins R, Markovich E (2016) Attribution of extreme weather events in the context of climate change. The national academies of sciences, engineering, and medicine. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  69. Tsuji GY, Uehara G, Balas S (eds) (1994) DSSAT v3, volumes 1, 2 and 3. International Benchmark Sites Network for Agrotechnology Transfer, University of Hawaii, Hawaii, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  70. Tubiello FN, Amthor JS, Boote KJ, Donatelli M, Easterling W, Fischer G, Gifford RM, Howden M, Reilly J, Rosenzweig C (2007) Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply: a comment on “Food for Thought …” by Long et al., Science 312:1918–1921, 2006. Eur J Agron 26:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. UNESCO (1973) International classification and mapping of vegetation. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  72. Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Bojø J, Sjaastad E, Kobugabe GK (2007) Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy Econ 9:869–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. World Bank (2008) World development report 2008: agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams JR, Renard KG, Dyke PT (1984) EPIC—a new model for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. J Soil Water Conserv 8:381–383Google Scholar
  75. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (1985) Report of the international conference on the assessment of the role of carbon dioxide and of other greenhouse gases in climate variations and associated impacts. Villach, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  76. World Resources Institute (WRI) (2005) World resources 2005: The wealth of the poor—managing ecosystems to fight poverty. WRI, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Niggol Seo
    • 1
  1. 1.Muaebak Institute of Global Warming StudiesSeorim-dong, Gwanak-gu, SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations