Advertisement

Psychological Reflection, Thought and Imagination as Epistemic Skills

  • Miika VähämaaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 141)

Abstract

Psychological reflection is a fundamental element of interpersonal psychological communication that builds on common sense and shared, or commonly understood, word meanings. In Psycho-logic Jan Smedslund (1988), states that without these two key elements of communication the following occurs: misunderstandings and disorderliness in psychological interactions increases. This chapter posits that the loss of common sense and language are happening. This diminishes our ability to reason psychologically valid thoughts concerning the self and others. As a solution, I propose an increased reliance on imaginative processes in psychological reflection, conceptualized as synthetic thinking.

The loss of common sense is largely due to the media which ‘narrow-cast’ meanings to small groups of like-minded individuals. Therefore, rhetoric is increasingly and understandably focused on desirable actions and meanings aligned with our groups and affiliations. This allows the decay of the common sense, or the κοινὴ αἴσθησις, of the ancient Greeks. Such a loss is a particular problem of emotionally driven group-settings such as psychological practices and familial contexts, where loss of shared language cause people to ‘talk past’ one another.

Since “common sense” and a priori psychological knowledge seem to be insufficient sources for continued understandable psychological communication, we need to incorporate “idiosyncratic sense” in psychological reflection as an epistemic skill. Such synthetic thinking gives imagination credibility as a source of psychological knowledge. Also, synthetic thinking can enable the regeneration of language. If we become good at reflecting and understanding flexible word meanings and the co-existence of imaginative interpretations, we enable newfound interpersonal meanings.

Keywords

Psychological reflection Synthetic thinking Psycho-logic Epistemic skills Imaginative processes 

References

  1. Annas, J. 1993. The morality of happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2004. Happiness as achievement. Daedalus 133 (2): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardone-Cone, A., and K.M. Cass. 2007. What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders 40 (6): 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baresch, B., L. Knight, D. Harp, and C. Yaschur. 2011. Friends who choose your news: An analysis of content links on Facebook. ISOJ: The Official Research Journal of International Symposium on Online Journalism 1 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, J. 1988. The hyper-realism of simulation. In Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings, ed. M. Poster, 143–147. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bean, S.J. 2011. Emerging and continuing trends in vaccine opposition website content. Vaccine 29 (10): 1874–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergin, L. 2001. The role of truth when communicating knowledge across epistemic difference. Social Epistemology 15 (4): 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betsch, C., N.T. Brewer, P. Brocard, P. Davies, W. Gaissmaier, N. Haase, J. Leask, F. Renkewitz, B. Renner, V.F. Reyna, C. Rossmann, K. Sachse, A. Schachinger, M. Siegrist, and M. Stryk. 2012. Opportunities and challenges of web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine 30 (25): 3727–3733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinkmann, S. 2015. Imagining cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 21 (2): 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison, N.B., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe. 2011. Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society 13 (6): 873–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fallis, D. 2007. Collective epistemic goals. Social Epistemology 21 (3): 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flaherty, D.K. 2011. The vaccine-autism connection: A public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 45 (10): 1302–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredrickson, B.L. 2004. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359 (1449): 1367–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredrickson, B. 2009. Positivity. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  15. Fuller, S. 2002. Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert, M. 1987. Modelling collective belief. Synthese 73 (1): 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldman, A.I. 1999. Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. 2016, May. News use across social media platforms 2016 (Publication by Pew Research Center). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
  19. Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society. Vol. 1. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1994. The past as future. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2006. Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamill, J. 1990. Ethno-logic. Urbana, OH: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hardwig, J. 1985. Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy 82 (7): 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris, P.L. 2000. Understanding Children’s worlds. The work of the imagination. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Hewstone, M. 1990. The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology 20 (4): 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kata, A. 2010. A postmodern pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine 28 (7): 1709–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellstedt, P.M., S. Zahran, and A. Vedlitz. 2008. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change. Risk Analysis 28 (1): 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitcher, P. 2002. Veritistic value and the project of social epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1): 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kock, C.E.J. 2009. Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 23 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kruglanski, A.W., A. Pierro, L. Mannetti, and E. De Grada. 2006. Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review 113 (1): 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mackinnon, D.W. 1962. The nature and nurture of talent. American Psychologist 17 (7): 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathiesen, K. 2007. Introduction to special issue of social epistemology on collective knowledge and collective knowers. Social Epistemology 21 (3): 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nisbet, M.C., and J.E. Kotcher. 2009. A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication 30 (3): 328–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nussbaum, M.C. 1987. Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1): 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oeberst, A., J. Kimmerle, and U. Cress. 2016. What is knowledge? Who creates it? Who possesses it? The need for novel answers to old questions. In Mass collaboration and education, Computer-supported collaborative learning series, ed. U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, and H. Jeong, vol. 16, 105–124. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oppenheimer, M., B.C. O’Neill, M. Webster, and S. Agrawala. 2007. Climate change: The limits of consensus. Science 317 (5844): 1505–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pelaprat, E., and M. Cole. 2011. “Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45 (4): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phadke, V.K., R.A. Bednarczyk, D.A. Salmon, and S.B. Omer. 2016. Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: A review of measles and pertussis. Journal of the American Medical Association 315 (11): 1149–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piaget, J. 1972. The principles of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Resch, R.P. 1992. Althusser and the renewal of Marxist social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Salter, L. 2003. Democracy, new social movements, and the internet. In Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice, ed. M. McCaughey and M. Ayers, 117–144. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Shapin, S. 1994. A social history of truth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smedslund, J. 1988. Psycho-logic. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2008. From Heider to psycho-logic. Social Psychology 39 (3): 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2012. Psycho-logic: Some thoughts and after-thoughts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53 (4): 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strauss, L. 1989. The three waves of modernity. In An introduction to political philosophy: Ten essays by Leo Strauss, ed. Hilail Gildin, 81–98. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tajfel, H. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. In Annual Review of Psychology, ed. M.R. Rosenweig and L.W. Porter, 1–39. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  48. Tateo, L. 2015. Giambattista Vico and the psychological imagination. Culture & Psychology 21 (2): 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2016. Toward a cogenetic cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 22 (3): 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tuomela, R. 1995. The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Uusikylä, K. 1992. Lahjakkuus ja kasvatus. Hämeenlinna: Hämeenlinnan opettajankoulutuslaitos.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 1994. Lahjakkaiden kasvatus. In Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar
  53. Vähämaa, M. 2013. Groups as epistemic communities: Social forces and affect as antecedents to knowledge. Social Epistemology 27 (1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ———. 2015. Groups as epistemic communities Studies on the role of groups in forming and circulating social knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses database. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-1012-1
  55. Vähämaa, M., and K. Härmälä. 2011. Comparing perceptions of mathematics: Norwegian and finnish university students’ definitions of mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 16 (4): 100–111.Google Scholar
  56. Virilio, P. 1997. Open sky. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  57. West, M.D. 2014. Doxastic involuntarism, attentional voluntarism, and social epistemology. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (5): 37–51.Google Scholar
  58. Wide, S. 2009. On the art of being wrong: An essay on the dialectic of errors. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4): 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wilkerson, T.E. 1973. Seeing-as. Mind 82 (328): 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics, Media and Communication Faculty of Social Science, University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations