Advertisement

Dying in a Liberal Society

  • Jeff MalpasEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures book series (SCPT, volume 30)

Abstract

One of Max Charlesworth’s most important contributions has been to the development of contemporary bioethical thinking. In Bioethics in a Liberal Society, Charlesworth explores the consequences of the liberal commitment to the core value of autonomy across a range of areas beginning with the end of life. Focusing on just this latter issue, this contribution explores the question whether the principle of autonomy is indeed adequate to be the primary principle on the basis of which to address the issues surrounding the end of life. Part of the underlying concern here is thus with the nature of our dying in a ‘liberal society’ of the sort Charlesworth describes.

References

  1. Benjamin, A. (2015). Towards a relational ontology. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (R. G. Smith, Trans., 2nd ed.). New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  3. Charlesworth, M. (1993). Bioethics in a liberal society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan, R. (2006). Confucian filial piety and long term care for aged parents. HEC Forum, 18(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Levinas, E. (1978). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Malpas, J. (2015a). From extremity to releasement: Place, authenticity, and the self. In H. Pedersen & L. Hatab (Eds.), The horizons of authenticity: Essays in honor of Charles Guignon’s work on phenomenology, existentialism, and moral psychology (pp. 45–62). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Malpas, J. (2015b). Self, other, thing: Triangulation and topography in post-Kantian philosophy. Philosophy Today, 59, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCormick, R. A. (1991). Physician assisted suicide: Flight from compassion. Christian Century, 108, 1132–1134.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. New Haven: Harvard.Google Scholar
  12. Trilling, L. (1971). Sincerity and authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zengzi. (2015). Xiao jing (Classic of filial piety) (J. Legge, Trans.). Lionshare Chinese Classics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Latrobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations