Max Charlesworth’s Philosophy and Religion: From Plato to Postmodernism is an erudite and scholarly work, grounded in an impressive command of the history of philosophy of religion. However, despite its many virtues, the work has some serious shortcomings, due more to what it overlooks than to what it includes. In this paper, I review Charlesworth’s taxonomy of approaches to philosophy of religion, and argue for an alternative taxonomy that does more justice to the diversity of religions and the evidence produced by social scientific studies of religion. In particular, I suggest that Charlesworth pays insufficient attention to the project of articulating, comparing and assessing competing religious and non-religious worldviews.
Philosophy of religion Worldview Faith Religious language Postmodern Feminist view Diversity Social sciences Aquinas
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Boyarin, D. (2016). Imagine no religion. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar