Advertisement

Screen as Skin: The Somatechnics of Touchscreen Music Media

  • Laura Glitsos
Chapter
Part of the Pop Music, Culture and Identity book series (PMCI)

Abstract

This chapter explores the way mobile music devices with touchscreen technology produce new somatechnical figurations that reshape emotional dynamics of music listening. Touchscreens imply the relationship between skin on skin—the skin of our body (in particular the hands) against the skin of the screen. It follows that mobile touchscreen devices suggest a degree of sensuality—in the coming together of bodies, fluids and other organic materials which ‘stick’ to the touchscreen, the language of ‘stickiness’ pointing to Sara Ahmed’s conceptualization of the way affect can “stick” to bodies. The function of skin, both in a corporeal and a discursive sense, cannot be. Skin is not politically benign. By “thinking through the skin,” to use the Sara Ahmed and Jackie Stacey’s words, the author reads mobile touchscreen technology as an exciting new way to imagine music listening in terms of cyborgian relations.

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Sara, and Jackie Stacey. 2003. Thinking Through the Skin. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Åman, Pirkka, and Lassi Liikkanen. 2013. Painting the City with Music: Context Aware Mobile Services for Urban Environment. Continuum 27 (4): 542–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anzieu, Didier. 1989. The Skin Ego. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, David. 2010. Mobile Music, Coded Objects and Everyday Spaces. Mobilities 5 (4): 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bull, Michael. 2000. Sounding Out the City: Personal Stereos and the Management of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2005. ‘No Dead Air!’ The iPod and the Culture of Mobile Listening. Leisure Studies 24 (4): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2008. Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Castañeda, Claudia. 2003. Robotic Skin: The Future of Touch? In Thinking Through the Skin, ed. Sara Ahmed and Jackie Stacey, 223–236. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Cataldi, Sue L. 1993. Emotion, Depth, and Flesh: A Study of Sensitive Space, Reflections on Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy of Embodiment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, Ulrika, and Jenny Sundén. 2013. Guest Editors Introduction: Somatechnical Figurations. Somatechnics 3 (2): 225–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutscher, Penelope. 2003. Three Touches to the Skin and One Look: Sartre and Beauvoir on Desire and Embodiment. In Thinking Through the Skin, ed. Sara Ahmed and Jackie Stacey, 143–159. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  13. dfloyd13. 2014. ‘Looking at Someone’s iPod Was Like Looking into Their Soul’ On Death and iPods: A Requiem. Reddit.com. https://www.reddit.com/r/gadgets/comments/2gy4xu/looking_at_someones_ipod_was_like_looking_into/
  14. Drucker, Donna. 2014. The Machines of Sex Research: Technology and the Politics of Identity, 1945–1985. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fanon, Frantz. [1952] 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by C. Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  16. Geurts, Kathryn Linn. 2002. Culture and the Senses: Bodily Ways of Knowing in an African Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gluckstern, Nicole. 2010. The Performant: Dies Arses Have It. San Francisco Bay Guardian, December 31. http://www.sfbg.com/pixel_vision/2010/10/06/performant-diesarses-haveit
  18. Gonzalez, Jennifer. 1995. Envisioning Cyborg Bodies: Notes from Current Research. In The Cyborg Handbook, ed. C. Hables Gray, Steven Mentor, and Heidi Figueroa-Sarriera, 267–279. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gram, Nina. 2009. Music Mobilizing Meaning within Place: An Examination of Different Central Characteristics of the Mobile Sound and Listening Space. Paper presented at Motion and Emotion within Place: International Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, October 7–8.Google Scholar
  20. Hanlon, Mike. 2006. Ohmibod: The First iPod Acsexory. Gizmag, December 31. http://www.gizmag.com/go/6492/
  21. Haraway, Donna. 1987. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies 2 (4): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henry, Paula, Phuong Tran, and Tomasz Letowski. 2009. Comparison of bone conduction Technologies Technical Report. Aberdeen, MD: Army Research Lab Human Research and Engineering Directorate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hiltzik, Michael. 2014. RIP: The Apple iPod, 2001–2014. LA Times, December 31. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-rip-the-apple-ipod-20012014-20140911-column.html
  24. Kahney, Leander. 2005. The Cult of iPod. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kirk, David. 2012. Why Can’t I Use Gloves with My Touchscreen Phone? TechRecipes, December 31, 2015. http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/20564/why-cant-i-use-gloveswith-my-touchscreen-phone/
  26. Maines, Rachel. 1999. The Technology of Orgasm: ‘Hysteria,’ the Vibrator, and Women’s Sexual Satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mitchell, William J. 2003. Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orbaugh, Sharalyn. 2002. Sex and the Single Cyborg: Japanese Popular Culture Experiments in Subjectivity. Science Fiction Studies 29 (3): 436–452.Google Scholar
  29. Paterson, Mark. 2007. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  30. Sartre, Jean Paul. [1943] 1992. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shildrick, Margrit. 2003. ‘You Are There, Like My Skin’: Reconfiguring Relational Economies. In Thinking Through the Skin, ed. Sara Ahmed and Jackie Stacey, 160–174. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2015. Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?: Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics. Hypatia 30 (1): 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sterne, Jonathan. 2006. MP3 as Cultural Artifact. New Media and Society 8 (5): 825–842.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806067737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sullivan, Nikki, and Samantha Murray, eds. 2009. Somatechnics: Queering the Technologisation of Bodies. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  36. Tyler, Imogen. 2001. Skin Tight: Celebrity, Pregnancy, and Subjectivity. In Thinking Through the Skin, ed. Sara Ahmed and Jackie Stacey, 69–83. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  37. Weiss, Gail. 1999. Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Werner, Ann. 2015. Moving forward: A Feminist Analysis of Mobile Music Streaming. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 7 (2): 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Glitsos
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of HumanitiesEdith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations