Advertisement

Political Hypotheses and Mathematical Conclusions

  • Paul H. EdelmanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic Design book series (DESI)

Abstract

When modeling or analyzing democratic processes, mathematicians may find themselves in unfamiliar territory: politics. How we proceed mathematically may depend heavily on our conception of representative democracy and theory of government. I will give a number of illustrations to show how contestable political principles lead to differing mathematical analyses. Our mathematical conclusions are inherently governed by our political hypotheses.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Ed Cheng, Marcus Pivato, Suzanna Sherry and Bill Zwicker for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Balinski, M., & Laraki, R. (2010). Majority judgment: Measuring, ranking and electing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Balinski, M., & Young, H. P. (2001). Fair representation (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  3. Edelman, P. H. (2006). Getting the math right: Why California has too many seats in the house of representatives. Vanderbilt Law Review, 59, 297–346.Google Scholar
  4. Edelman, P. H. (2012). Book review: Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki: Majority judgment: Measuring, ranking, and electing. Public Choice151, 807–810.Google Scholar
  5. Edelman, P. H. (2016). Evenwel, voting power, and dual districting. Journal of Legal Studies, 45, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evenwel v. Abbott. (2016). 136 S. Ct. 1120.Google Scholar
  7. Felsenthal, D. S., & Machover, M. (1998). The measurement of voting power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill v. Whitford. (2018). 585 US.Google Scholar
  9. Ianucci v. Board of Supervisors of Washington County, NY. (1967). 282 NYS 2d 502.Google Scholar
  10. Stephanopoulos, N. O., & McGhee, E. M. (2015). Partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap. University of Chicago Law Review, 82, 831–900.Google Scholar
  11. Wigner, E. P. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and the Law SchoolVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations