Advertisement

Communities of Inquiry in Crisis Management Exercises

  • Lena-Maria ÖbergEmail author
  • Christina Amcoff Nyström
  • Allison Littlejohn
  • Emmy Vrieling-Teunter
Chapter
Part of the Research in Networked Learning book series (RINL)

Abstract

Employees working in diverse settings such as schools, shops and government organisations have to be prepared for crisis situations, for example, a school shooting, extreme weather flooding, a health pandemic and so on. In these situations, they have to deal with the unexpected which makes it difficult to anticipate what they need to learn and how. This chapter examines how employees learn to deal with crisis situations, specifically focusing on whether a crisis management exercise could contribute to the development of a community of inquiry (CoI). The CoI model is chosen as the underpinning theory because it is assumed that learning communities create awareness, trust and support knowledge sharing, which are necessary pre-conditions for collaboration in crisis management situations. The study uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative data to analyse a simulated crisis exercise. The first round of analysis evidences that the exercise does not contribute to the development of a learning community. Digging deeper into the data in a second round, the results show that the CoI model does not reflect the various types of learning communities that develop within a crisis management exercise, such as home communities, cohort communities, specialist communities and local working groups. A key recommendation is that the CoI model should be expanded to include these four community types. Four additional key concepts appear important for community development in crisis management exercises: adoption of the various group, considering important partnerships, value creation and visibility. The extended CoI model could help to plan, monitor and evaluate professional learning of learning communities in future crisis management exercises.

Keywords

Communities of inquiry Crisis management Professional learning 

References

  1. Andersson, A., Carlström, E. D., Ahgren, B., & Berlin, J. M. (2014). Managing boundaries at the accident scene: A qualitative study of collaboration exercises. International Journal of Emergency Services, 3(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aradau, C., & van Munster, R. (2012). The securitization of catastrophic events: Trauma, enactment, and preparedness exercises. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 37(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berlin, J., & Carlström, E. (2015). Collaboration exercises. What do they contribute?: A study of learning and usefulness. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(1), 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boin, A., Kofman-Bos, C., & Overdijk, W. (2004). Crisis simulation: Exploring tomorrow’s vulnerabilities and threats. Simulation and Gaming, 34(3), 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borell, J., & Eriksson, K. (2013). Learning effectiveness of discussion-based crisis management exercises. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Laat, M. F. (2005). Networked learning. (Doctoral dissertation, Police Academy of the Netherlands).Google Scholar
  8. Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a community of inquiry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.Google Scholar
  10. Hodgson, C., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Magnusson, M., & Öberg, L. M. (2015). Crisis training software and user needs: Research directions. Proceedings of 12th international conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM ‘15), Kristiansand, Norway.Google Scholar
  12. Öberg, L. M., & Nyström, C. A. (2016). Evaluation of the level of collaboration in a regional crisis exercise setting: The use of community of inquiry. Paper presented at Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS) 2016, Sweden, Ljungskile. Available online at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-29640
  13. Ozturk, H. T., & Ozcinar, H. (2013). Learning in multiple communities from the perspective of knowledge capital. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perry, R. W. (2004). Disaster exercise outcomes for professional emergency personnel and citizen volunteers. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(2), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramondt L., Chapman C., & Powell S. (Eds.) (2002). Talking heads report (short version). Available online at: http://rubble.heppell.net/talking_heads/media/shortTHreport.pdf. Retrieved January 1, 2018.
  16. Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(10), 35–44.Google Scholar
  17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lena-Maria Öberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christina Amcoff Nyström
    • 1
  • Allison Littlejohn
    • 2
  • Emmy Vrieling-Teunter
    • 3
  1. 1.Mid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden
  2. 2.College of Social SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Welten Institute, Research Centre for Learning, Teaching, and TechnologyOpen University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations