Advertisement

Analysing Social Learning of Teacher-Learning Groups That Aim at Knowledge Creation

  • Emmy Vrieling-TeunterEmail author
  • Iwan Wopereis
  • Antoine van den Beemt
  • Maarten de Laat
  • Saskia Brand-Gruwel
Chapter
Part of the Research in Networked Learning book series (RINL)

Abstract

Teacher-learning groups (TLGs) are an emerging type of collegial collaboration in teacher training colleges. A TLG of teacher educators that was studied aimed to develop a new curriculum for aspirant primary school teachers. This TLG created a sustainable knowledge base necessary to implement a new teacher training curriculum. An extended version of the Dimensions of Social Learning Framework (Vrieling et al., Teach Teac Theory Pract 22:273–92, 2016) was used to reveal indicators for sustainable knowledge creation. The adapted framework – in this chapter abbreviated as DSL-E Framework (E, extended) – was informed by the Social Capital Model (Ehlen, Co-creation of innovation: Investment with and in social capital (Doctoral dissertation). Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands, 2014) and the Value Creation Framework (Wenger et al., Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands, 2011). The usefulness of this adaptation for analysing sustainable knowledge creation was explored with a case study. Results show that the DSL-E Framework is helpful to identify indicators for sustainable knowledge creation. First, the use of the DSL-E Framework revealed the collective knowledge working identity as indicator. A gradual development of distributed leadership as well as an inquiry-based attitude appeared necessary ingredients in this matter. Second, institutional value creation was found an important indicator for sustainable knowledge creation. This indicator says that TLGs should involve all stakeholders when starting a joint enterprise and connect actions to institutional goals right from the start.

Keywords

Professional development Social capital Social learning Teacher-learning groups Value creation 

References

  1. Agterberg, M., Van den Hooff, B., Huysman, M., & Soekijad, M. (2009). Keeping the wheels turning: The dynamics of managing networks of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barak, J., Gidron, A., & Turniansky, B. (2010). ‘Without stones there is no arch’: A study of professional development of teacher educators as a team. Professional Development in Education, 36, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornat, J. (2008). Biographical methods. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 344–356). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud, D., & Hager, P. (2012). Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büchel, B., & Raub, S. (2002). Building knowledge-creating value networks. European Management Journal, 20, 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. De Laat, M., Vrieling, E., & Van den Beemt, A. (2017). Facilitation of social learning in teacher education: The ‘Dimensions of Social Learning-Framework’. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Communities of practice: Facilitating social learning in Higher education (pp. 153–174). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doppenberg, J., Bakx, A., & Den Brok, P. (2012). Collaborative teacher learning in different primary school settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehlen, C. (2014). Co-creation of innovation: Investment with and in social capital (Doctoral dissertation). Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Ehlen, C., Van der Klink, M., Roentgen, U., Curfs, E., & Boshuizen, E. (2014). Knowledge productivity for sustainable innovation: Social capital as HRD target. European Journal of Training and Development, 38, 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). De strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, E., Berry, R., Lai, Y. C., Leung, P., Scott, D., & Stobart, G. (2013). Teachers’ experiences of autonomy in continuing professional development: Teacher learning communities in London and Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 17, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haythornthwaite, C., & De Laat, M. (2012). Social network informed design for learning with education technology. In A. D. Olofsson & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 352–374). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz, S., & Earl, L. (2010). Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knapp, R. (2010). Collective (team) learning process models: A conceptual review. Human Resource Development Review, 9, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laferrière, T., Lamon, M., & Chan, C. K. K. (2006). Emerging e-trends and models in teacher education and professional development. Teaching Education, 17, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leh, A., Kouba, B., & Davis, D. (2005). Twenty-first century learning: Communities, interaction and ubiquitous computing. Educational Media International, 42, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mazereeuw, M., Wopereis, I., & McKenney, S. (2016). Extended teams in vocational education: Collaboration on the border. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22, 194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meijer, M.-J., Geijsel, F., Kuijpers, M., Boei, F., & Vrieling, E. (2016). Exploring teachers’ inquiry-based attitude. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  25. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modelling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trayner, B. (2014). World bank report and recommendations: Learning partnerships in the program for capacity building to strengthen good financial governance in Southern and Eastern Africa 2010–2014. Retrieved from http://sadcopac.pac-networks.org
  27. Vaessen, M., Van den Beemt, A., & De Laat, M. (2014). Networked professional learning: Relating the formal and the informal. Frontline Learning Research, 2(2), 56–71.Google Scholar
  28. Van den Beemt, A., Vrieling, E., & De Laat, M. (2015). Toepassing en validering van het ‘Dimensies van Sociaal Leren’-raamwerk. [Application and validation of the ‘Dimensions of Social Learning’ Framework]. Paper presented at the 2015 Dutch Educational Research Conference, ORD, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2014). Team entitativety and teacher teams in schools: Towards a typology. Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 86–98.Google Scholar
  30. Vrieling, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2010). Process-oriented design principles for promoting self-regulated learning in primary teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4–5), 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vrieling, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012). Using online learning networks to promote self-regulated learning in primary teacher education. In C. D. Maddux & D. Gibson (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2012 (pp. 101–109). Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE).Google Scholar
  32. Vrieling, E., Van den Beemt, A., & De Laat, M. (2016). What’s in a name: Dimensions of social learning in teacher groups. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmy Vrieling-Teunter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iwan Wopereis
    • 2
  • Antoine van den Beemt
    • 3
  • Maarten de Laat
    • 2
    • 4
  • Saskia Brand-Gruwel
    • 2
  1. 1.Welten Institute, Research Centre for Learning, Teaching, and TechnologyOpen University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Welten Institute, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Eindhoven School of Education, Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations