Advertisement

Studying the Effects of Optimal Fleet Management of Plug-In Electric Vehicles on the Unit Commitment Problem Considering the Technical and Social Aspects

  • Mehdi Rahmani-Andebili
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the effects of fleet management (FM) of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) on the generation scheduling and unit commitment (UC) problem of a generation system are studied considering the technical and social aspects of the problem. The objective function of generation company (GENCO) is to minimize the operation cost of generation system by the optimal FM of PEVs considering low, moderate, and high PEV penetration levels. Herein, the drivers are categorized in three different social classes based on their income level including low-income, moderate-income, and high-income. In this study, the behavior of each social class of drivers is modelled based on the reaction of drivers with respect to the value of incentive, suggested by the GENCO, to transfer their charging demand from the peak period to the off-peak one. A sensitivity analysis is performed for the total cost of problem with respect to value of incentive considering different PEV penetration levels and various social classes of drivers. Moreover, the value of error (due to the unrealistic modelling of drivers’ social class) in the optimal value of incentive, minimum total cost of problem, and generation scheduling and commitment of generation units is investigated.

Keywords

Drivers’ behavioral model Drivers’ social class Fleet management (FM) Generation scheduling Plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) Unit commitment (UC) 

References

  1. 1.
    “Monthly plug-in sales scorecard,” Accessed on: Aug 2018. [Online]. Available: http://insideevs.com/monthly-plug-in-sales-scorecard
  2. 2.
    Clean Energy Ministerial, “Electric vehicles initiative,” Accessed on: Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://cleanenergyministerial.org/Our-Work/Initiatives/Electric-Vehicles. Accessed on: Aug 2018
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    [Online]. Available: https://electrek.co/2017/05/05/electric-vehicle-sales-vs-gas-2040/. Accessed on: Aug 2018
  6. 6.
    Worldwide survey of network-driven demand-side management projects, Task XV, IEA-DSM Res. Rep. No. 1, 2006Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEA, “Strategic plan for the IEA demand-side management program 2008–2012” [Online]. Available: http://www.ieadsm.org
  8. 8.
    U.S. Department of Energy, Benefit of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them, in: A report to the United States Congress, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/DOEBenefitsofDemandResponseinElectricityMarketsandRecommendationsforAchievingThemReporttoCongress.pdf
  9. 9.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, A. Abdollahi, M.P. Moghaddam, An investigation of implementing emergency demand response programs in unit commitment problem, in IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, pp. 1–7, 24–29 July 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Investigating effect of responsive loads models on UC collaborated with demand side resources. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. J. 7(4), 420–430 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Nonlinear demand response programs for residential customers with nonlinear behavioral models. Energ Buildings (Elsevier) 119, 352–362 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Zhang, Z. Hu, D. Dai, S. Dang, M. Yao, Y. Zhou, Unit commitment model in smart grid environment considering carbon emissions trading. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(1), 420–427 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, G.K. Venayagamoorthy, Stochastic optimization for combined economic and emission dispatch with renewables, in IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, Cape Town, pp. 1252–1258, 710 Dec 2015Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, G.K. Venayagamoorthy, Combined emission and economic dispatch incorporating demand side resources, in IEEE Clemson University Power System Conference, Clemson, pp. 1–6, 10–13 Mar 2015Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Ye, Z. Li, Robust security-constrained unit commitment and dispatch with recourse cost requirement. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(5), 3527–3536 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.A. Tejada-Arango, P. Sanchez-Martın, A. Ramos, Security constrained unit commitment using line outage distribution factors. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(1), 329–337 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Zhao, R. Jiang, Distributionally robust contingency-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(1), 94–102 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Risk-cost based generation scheduling smartly mixed with reliability and market-driven demand response measures. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 25, 994–1007 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Meus, K. Poncelet, E. Delarue, Applicability of a clustered unit commitment model in power system modeling. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(2), 2195–2204 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.I. Vagropoulos, G.A. Balaskas, A.G. Bakirtzis, An investigation of plug-in electric vehicle charging impact on power systems scheduling and energy costs. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(3), 1902–1912 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, G.K. Venayagamoorthy, Chapter III.VI: Co-operative responsive electric vehicles for social-economic dispatch, in Cyber-Physical-Social Systems and Constructs in Electric Power Engineering, (Stevenage, U.K., IET, 2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Planning and operation of parking lots considering system, traffic, and drivers behavioral model. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2824122
  23. 23.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, M. Fotuhi Firuzabad, An adaptive approach for PEVs charging management and reconfiguration of electrical distribution system penetrated by renewables. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14(5), 2001 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Newbery, The economics of electric vehicles, in EPRG and Imperial College London, E&E Seminar, Cambridge, U.K., Jan 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/EEJan13_EconomicsEVs.pdf
  25. 25.
    H. Saadat, Power System Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=9310. Accessed on Aug 2018
  27. 27.
    [Online]. Available: http://www.ferc.gov/market-oversight/mkt-electric/overview.asp. Accessed on Aug 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehdi Rahmani-Andebili
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations