Advertisement

Assessment and Psychology of Pain

  • Will Tyson
  • Anuj Malhotra
Chapter

Abstract

Due to the subjective nature of pain and the many forms of its expression, pain is difficult to objectively evaluate. Pain can be evaluated indirectly by measuring physiologic indicators or inferred from use of rescue analgesics. Direct evaluation of pain can be achieved by utilizing either unidimensional or multidimensional measures relying heavily on patient self-report. Outcome measures in pain must meet the following criteria: validity, reliability, appropriateness, responsiveness, and burden. In addition, one must consider both statistical and clinical significance, which may differ.

Keywords

Psychology of pain Pain assessment Pain evaluation Self-report Unidimensional measures Multidimensional measures 

References

  1. 1.
    Merskey H. Psychological approaches to the treatment of chronic pain. Postgrad Med J. 1984;60(710):886–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim H, Neubert JK, San Miguel A, Xu K, Krishnaraju RK, Iadarola MJ, et al. Genetic influence on variability in human acute experimental pain sensitivity associated with gender, ethnicity and psychological temperament. Pain. 2004;109(3):488–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malhotra A, Mackey S. Outcomes in pain medicine: a brief review. Pain Ther. 2012;1(1):5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-012-0005-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gagliese L, Melzack R. Chronic pain in elderly people. Pain. 1997;70(1):3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilron I, Jensen MP. Clinical trial methodology of pain treatment studies: selection and measurement of self-report primary outcomes for efficacy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(4):374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the visual analogue scale. Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13(1):15–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17(1):45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976;31(9):1191–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Younger J, McCue R, Mackey S. Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13(1):39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994;23(2):129–38.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melzack R, Torgerson WS. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology. 1971;34(1):50–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain. 1985;23(4):345–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9(2):105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mchorney CA, Johne W, Anastasiae R. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers WH, Wittink H, Wagner A, Cynn D, Carr DB. Assessing individual outcomes during outpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment by means of an augmented SF-36. Pain Med. 2000;1(1):44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers WH, Wittink HM, Ashburn MA, Cynn D, Carr DB. Using the “TOPS,” an outcomes instrument for multidisciplinary outpatient pain treatment. Pain Med. 2000;1(1):55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Gagné TA, Mikail SF, D’Eon JL. Confirmatory factor analysis of a 4-factor model of chronic pain evaluation. Pain. 1995;60(2):195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beck AT. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4(6):561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale [Internet]. PsycTESTS Dataset. 1965;  https://doi.org/10.1037/t04095-000.
  22. 22.
    Hamilton M. Hamilton rating scale for depression [Internet]. PsycTESTS Dataset. 1960;  https://doi.org/10.1037/t04100-000.
  23. 23.
    McCracken LM, Zayfert C, Gross RT. The pain anxiety symptoms scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain. Pain. 1992;50(1):67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spielberger CD. State-trait anxiety inventory. In: The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hummel P, van Dijk M. Pain assessment: current status and challenges. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(4):237–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li D, Puntillo K, Miaskowski C. A review of objective pain measures for use with critical care adult patients unable to self-report. J Pain. 2008;9(1):2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Storm H. Skin conductance and the stress response from heel stick in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83(2):F143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Marchand S. Autonomic reactivity to pain throughout the menstrual cycle in healthy women. Clin Auton Res. 2009;19(3):167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Okuse K. Pain signalling pathways: from cytokines to ion channels. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(3):490–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Woodhouse LJ. Performance measures provide assessments of pain and function in people with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Phys Ther. 2006;86(11):1489–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smeets RJ, Hijdra HJM, Kester ADM, Hitters MW, André Knottnerus J. The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(11):989–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goodson A, McGregor AH, Douglas J, Taylor P. Direct, quantitative clinical assessment of hand function: usefulness and reproducibility. Man Ther. 2007;12(2):144–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brown JE, Chatterjee N, Younger J, Mackey S. Towards a physiology-based measure of pain: patterns of human brain activity distinguish painful from non-painful thermal stimulation. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ung H, Brown JE, Johnson KA, Younger J, Hush J, Mackey S. Multivariate classification of structural MRI data detects chronic low back pain. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24(4):1037–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gershon RC, Rothrock N, Hanrahan R, Bass M, Cella D. The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. J Appl Meas. 2010;11(3):304–14.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113(1–2):9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106(3):337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Farrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;25(5):406–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kvien TK, Heiberg T, Hagen KB. Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean? Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(Suppl 3):iii40–1.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Will Tyson
    • 1
  • Anuj Malhotra
    • 2
  1. 1.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations