Advertisement

Facilitating Donald Trump: Populism, the Republican Party and Media Manipulation

  • David McKay
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses the question of how a man so psychologically flawed and unfit for high office as Donald Trump could be elected as President of the United States. The author points to three factors. The first was the transformation of the Republican Party from a centre-right party used to brokering policy solutions with the Democrats to a far-right insurgent outlier intent on imposing its will through manipulation and confrontation. The second involved the two-pronged revolution in communications since the 1980s as a result of the abandonment of the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ in 1987 and the emergence of the Internet. Third, these developments occurred in the context of the quite startling demographic and cultural changes: the non-white population is at an all-time high and traditional mores in sexual and social relations are being challenged as never before. The concomitant ascendancy of identity politics has set the scene for the assertion of white, nativist nationalism by those who felt abandoned by the Democrats; Trump was able to exploit these changes to appeal to this rising nativist sentiment, capture the nomination and eventually the presidency.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A.I. 2018. The Great Realignment: Race, Party Transformation and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels, L.M. 2018. Partisanship in the Trump Era. Vanderbilt University, Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.Google Scholar
  3. Calmes, J. 2015. They Don’t Give a Damn About Governing: Conservative Media’s Influence on the Republican Party. Harvard Kennedy School, Shorenstein Center on Media Politics and Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Carnes, N., and N. Lupu. 2017. It’s Time to Bust the Myth: Most Voters were Not Working Class. Washington Post, 5 June.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, M. 2018. Understanding the Global Rise of Populism. www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/research/updates/populism.
  6. Da Costa, P.N. 2018. Drastic Income Inequality Is Putting a Strain on America’s Social Safety Net. Business Insider, 27 March.Google Scholar
  7. Dionne, E.J., Jr., N.J. Ornstein, and T.E. Mann. 2017. One Nation After Trump: A Guide for the Disillusioned, The Desperate, and the Not Yet Deported. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  8. Drutman, L., L. Diamond, and J. Goldman. 2018. Follow the Leader: Exploring American Support for Democracy and Authoritarianism. Democracy Fund Voter Study Group. https://www.voterstudygroup.org/.
  9. Faris, R., H. Roberts, and E. Zuckerman. 2017. Bretibart Led Right-wing Media Ecosystem Altered Broader Media Agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 3 March.Google Scholar
  10. Fiorina, M. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frum, D. 2018. Trumpocracy: The Corruption of the American Republic. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  12. Grossman, M., and D.A. Hopkins. 2014. The Ideological Right v. the Group Benefits Left: Asymmetric Politics in America. Paper presented at the 2014 Mid-West Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  13. Hare, C., K.T. Poole, and H. Rosenthal. 2014. Polarization in Congress has Risen Sharply: Where Is it Going Next? Washington Post, 13 February.Google Scholar
  14. Hopkins, D.A. 2017. Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, A., ed. 1981. The American Election of 1980. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Levitsky, S., and D. Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Malone, C. 2016. The End of a Republican Party: Racial and Cultural Resentment Have Replaced the Party’s Small Government Ethos. FiveThirtyEight, 18 July.Google Scholar
  18. Mann, T.E., and N.J. Ornstein. 2008. The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get it Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2016. It’s Even Worse Than It Was: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. McDonald, T. 2017. Donald Trump Was Much Better at Social Media than Hillary Clinton. www.serplogic.com/all-things-marketing/donald-trump-social-media.
  21. Mislinski, J. 2017. US Household Incomes: A 50-Year Perspective. Adviser Perspectives, 17 September.Google Scholar
  22. New York Times. 2017. Median US Household Income up for the Second Straight Year. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/business/.../income-rebound-recession.html.
  23. O’Rourke, P.J. 2017. How the Hell Did This Happen? A Cautionary Tale of American Democracy. London: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pew Research Center. 2017. Many Unhappy with Current Political System. http://www.pewglobal.org/2-17/10/16/many unhappy-with-current-political-system/.
  25. Rauch, J., and R.J. La Raja. 2017. Re-Engineering Politicians: How Activist Groups Choose Our Politicians Long Before We Vote. Brookings Report, 7 December.Google Scholar
  26. Ruane, K.A. 2011. Fairness Doctrine: History and Constitutional Issues, 251–266. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  27. Silver, N. 2016. Why Republican Voters Decided on Trump. FiveThirtyEight, 4 May.Google Scholar
  28. Uslaner, E.M. 1993. The Decline of Comity in Congress. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • David McKay
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations