Advertisement

Parliamentary and Presidential Systems: The Role of Parties and the Danger of Authoritarian Populism

  • Jean Blondel
  • Jean-Louis Thiebault
Chapter

Abstract

To flourish under liberal-democratic rule, a parliamentary or a presidential system does not depend primarily on the existence of strong leadership, but on the presence of strong political parties. The continuous existence of parties operating on lively liberal-democratic characteristics is the truly relevant factor: if parties with these characteristics decline, parliamentary and presidential systems are likely to experience crises. Currently, in Europe, some parties of the Right or Left have come to question the norms and/or the institutions of liberal democracies. Such attitudes may result in the rise of ‘populism’, a populism which is typically rather authoritarian and appears to threaten the characteristics of traditional parties, in Britain and other countries. So far ‘authoritarian populism’ has not led to major changes in the structure of liberal-democratic political systems, although this may be because institutional arrangements to replace that structure have not as yet been discovered.

References

  1. Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006. The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies 39 (4): 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elgie, Robert. 2011. Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-types and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Galston, William A. 2018. The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy. Journal of Democracy 29 (2): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kapstein, Ethan B., and Nathan Converse. 2008. Why Democracies Fail. Journal of Democracy 19 (4): 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. King, Anthony, ed. 1985. The British Prime Minister. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2015. Who Governs Britain? London: Pelican.Google Scholar
  7. Linz, Juan J. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51–69.Google Scholar
  8. Linz, Juan J., and Arturo Valenzuela, eds. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. 2 vols. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The Undemocratic Dilemma. Journal of Democracy 29 (2): 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2018. Democracy Still Matters. The New York Times, 5 April 2018.Google Scholar
  11. Pereira, Carlos, Timothy J. Power, and Lucio Renno. 2005. Under What Conditions Do President Resort to Decree Power? Theory and Evidence from the Brazilian Case. Journal of Politics 67 (1): 178–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Raile, Eric, Carlos Pereira, and Timothy J. Power. 2011. The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime. Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Blondel
    • 1
  • Jean-Louis Thiebault
    • 2
  1. 1.Robert Schuman Centre, European University InstituteFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Political StudiesLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations