Advertisement

Applied Decision Making in Design Innovation Management

  • Eduardo Ahumada-TelloEmail author
  • Manuel Castañón-Puga
  • Carelia Gaxiola-Pacheco
  • Richard D. Evans
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 209)

Abstract

This article focuses on decision making for innovation management during product design. As such, it requires a holistic approach that determines the elements necessary for decision-making in knowledge-based organizations. The first part of this chapter explores the importance of the decision-making process, its role in organizational growth and development of strategies, as well as the high complexity that these processes have acquired over time in global and turbulent markets. Then, the decision-making process is detailed, recounting the elements that form it and the impact it has on organizations. Innovation and its classifications are later described, as well as its importance to modern economies. The importance of design, management and product development is also described. Case studies of companies operating in the Information Technology sector in Baja California, Mexico, are used to contextualize the research and demonstrate its validity for use during the development of new software products. Finally, the chapter concludes by exploring the relevance of this study, from a complex approach, using computational methodologies that increase the feasibility of carrying out decision-making with greater sustenance and expectation of success.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, Y., Ruhe, G.: The cognitive process of decision making. Int. J. Cogn. Inf. Nat. Intell. 1, 73–85 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2007040105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barney, J.: The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. J. Manag. 27, 625–641 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(01)00114-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peteraf, M.: The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg. Manag. J. 14, 179–191 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abubakar, A., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M., Elçi, A.: Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. J. Innov. Knowl. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lepora, N.: Decision making. Oxford Scholarship Online (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199674923.003.0028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S.: Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Manag. Decis. 47, 1323–1339 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacGregor, S.: Strategic management of technological innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 23, 102–104 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00184_4.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller, D., Friesen, P.: Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum. Strateg. Manag. J. 3, 1–25 (1982).  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thi, N., Thuong, H., Li, Z., et al.: Advances in intelligent systems and computing. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Riel, A., Lemmink, J., Ouwersloot, H.: High-Technology Service Innovation Success: a decision-making perspective. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 21, 348–359 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00087.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huarng, K., Mas-Tur, A., Calabuig Moreno, F.: Innovation, knowledge, judgment, and decision-making as virtuous cycles. J. Bus. Res. 88, 278–281 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christiansen, J., Varnes, C.: Making decisions on innovation: meetings or networks? Creat. Innov. Manag. 16, 282–298 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00441.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dane, E., Pratt, M.: Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 33–54 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yolles, M.: Organisational intelligence. J. Workplace Learn. 17, 99–114 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620510574496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castanon-Puga, M., Flores-Parra, J., Gaxiola-Pacheco, C., et al.: Extending NetLogo with interval type-2 fuzzy inference systems. In: 2014 Second World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS) (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icocs.2014.7060897
  16. 16.
    Ahumada-Tello, E., Castanon-Puga, M.: Modelling complex systems with distributed agency and fuzzy inference systems. Knowledge-based curricula in higher education. Procedia Comput. Sci. 80, 2317–2321 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Márquez Lobato, B.: Metodología Multinivel utilizando Sistemas Inteligentes, 1st ed. 200 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castro, J., Castillo, O., Melin, P., Rodríguez-Díaz, A.: A hybrid learning algorithm for a class of interval type-2 fuzzy neural networks. Inf. Sci. 179, 2175–2193 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.10.016CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bock, A.: The concepts of decision making: an analysis of classical approaches and avenues for the field of enterprise modeling. In: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 235, pp. 306–321 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25897-3_20Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rantala, J., Koivisto, H.: Optimised subtractive clustering for neuro-fuzzy models. In: 3rd WSES International Conference on Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Systems (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Ahumada-Tello
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manuel Castañón-Puga
    • 2
  • Carelia Gaxiola-Pacheco
    • 2
  • Richard D. Evans
    • 3
  1. 1.Facultad de Contaduría y AdministraciónUniversidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaTijuanaMexico
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e IngenieríaUniversidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaTijuanaMexico
  3. 3.Department of DesignCollege of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University LondonUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations