Advertisement

“E” Is for Empowering

  • Alexander Blount
Chapter

Abstract

Patients who experience themselves as partners with their doctors are generally more active in caring for their own health. For multiply-disadvantages patients, the steps to partnership have to include building trust in their health professionals and developing the experience of self-efficacy in relation to their lives and their health. For these patients the definition of empowerment that is used in trauma-informed care, that care is built on enhancing strengths rather than highlighting deficits, offers a place to start. The methodology of solution-focused interviewing provides a pathway to achieving this sort of empowerment. Solution-focused approaches to communication have an empowering effect for both patients and professionals, lowering team member burnout rates as it increases patient self-efficacy. Approaching treatment with multiply-disadvantaged patients by building on patients’ strengths in self-care and highlighting their histories of coping can be the step to empowerment that is the foundation for the shared decision-making called for by the IOM. The enhancement of self-confidence and self-efficacy of patients and their healthcare team members, based on evidence from the fields of neuroscience and memory, makes sensible the use of interviewing techniques that otherwise might be counterintuitive to many health professionals.

Keywords

Complex patients Patient empowerment Solution focused Patient participation Primary care Patient-centered 

References

  1. 1.
    Berwick D. What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff. 2009;28:w555–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delbanco T, Berwick DM, Boufford JI, et al. Healthcare in the land called PeoplePower: nothing about me without me. Health Expect. 2001;4:144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288:2469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mautner DB, Pang H, Brenner JC, Shea JA, Gross KS, Frasso R, Cannuscio CC. Generating hypotheses about care needs of high utilizers: lessons from patient interviews. Popul Health Manag. 2013;16:S26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). National healthcare quality and disparities report. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2016. July 2017. AHRQ Pub. No. 17-0001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Willems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J. Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference? Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris M, Fallot R, editors. Using trauma theory to design service systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krause DJ, Green SA, Koury SP, Hales TW. Solution-focused trauma-informed care (SF-TIC): an integration of models. J Publ Child Welfare. 2018;12:117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooperrider DL, Whitney D. A positive revolution in change: appreciative inquiry. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler; 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Jong P, Berg IK. Interviewing for solutions. 4th ed. Belmont: Brooks/Cole; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watzlawick P, Weakland J, Fisch R. Change: principles of problem formulation and problem resolution. New York: W. W. Norton; 1974.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gingerich WJ, de Shazer S, Weiner-Davis M. Constructing change: a research view of interviewing. In: Lipchik E, editor. Interviewing. Rockville: Aspen; 1988.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gottman JM. Marital interaction. New York: Academic Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hasselmo ME. How we remember: brain mechanisms of episodic memory. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cappas NM, Andres-Hyman R, Davidson L. What psychotherapists can begin to learn from neuroscience: seven principles of brain-based psychotherapy. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 2005;42:374–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garry M, Polaschek D. Reinventing yourself: who you are is limited only by your imagination. Psychol Today. 1999;32:65–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bannink F. 1001 solution-focused questions. New York: W. W. Norton; 2010.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Furman B, Ahola T. Solution talk: hosting therapeutic conversations. New York: W. W. Norton; 1992.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Shazer S. Clues: investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: W. W. Norton; 1988.Google Scholar

Resources

    Solution-Focused Interviewing

    1. Furman, B., and Ahola, T. (1992). Solution talk: Hosting therapeutic conversations. New York: W. W. Norton. A classic book in the field that can be borrowed at no cost with examples of SFI conversations from a broad range of settings and with many types of problems and symptoms. https://archive.org/details/solutiontalkhost00furm

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Blount
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PsychologyAntioch University New EnglandKeeneUSA

Personalised recommendations