Advertisement

The Alchemy of Painting: How the Technology of Oil Paint Transmuted Art

  • Stoyan V. SgourevEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Scholarship has identified the need to better understand and empirically capture the complexity of the interplay between technological and social factors. One way to disentangle this interplay is to follow the same technology over time. This is the approach adopted in this chapter, pursuing a longitudinal perspective by analyzing the emergence and diffusion of oil-based paint in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. A key methodological advantage of oil paint is that it is irreducible to a cultural artefact, constituting a distinct material development. Starting with an overview of the affordances of the technology, the analysis documents how they were activated in two contexts: Flanders and Venice. While reflecting cultural and religious developments, the new technology was an agent of change. The substantive contribution is in highlighting the process of bifurcation of affordances and outcomes, as oil paint catalyzed a divide that was until then only implicit—between representational and expressive functions of art. The technology was a source of tension in the same cultural context that made it possible. The implications of the analysis for contemporary developments, such as the digital museum, are also discussed.

References

  1. Acord, S. K., & DeNora, T. (2008). Culture and the arts: From art worlds to arts-in-action. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619(1), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291(5509), 1748–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspers, P. (2001). A market in vogue: Fashion photography in Sweden. European Societies, 3(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxandall, M. (1980). The limewood sculptors of Renaissance Germany. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of intention: On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baxandall, M. (1988). Painting and experience in fifteenth century Italy: A primer in the social history of pictorial style. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, P. F. (1988). Venetian narrative painting in the age of Carpaccio. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cappetta, R., Cillo, P., & Ponti, A. (2006). Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation. Research Policy, 35(9), 1273–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Lanza, A. (2017). Deconstructing the outsider puzzle: The legitimation journey of novelty. Organization Science, 28(6), 965–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caves, R. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, A. E., & Fujimura, J. H. (1992). The right tools for the right job: At work in 20th-century life sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenman, M. (2013). Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson, J. J. (1982). A preliminary description and classification of affordances. In E. S. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism (Chapter 4.9, Part II) (pp. 403–406). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Gieryn, T. (2002). What buildings do. Theory & Society, 31(1), 35–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harbison, C. (1995). Jan van Eyck: The play of realism. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  19. Harbison, C. (2012). The art of the Northern Renaissance. London: Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Hennion, A. (2015). The passion for music: A sociology of mediation. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hockney, D. (2006). Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the lost techniques of the old masters. London and New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  22. Hope, C. (2004). Titian. London: Chaucer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ilckman, F. (2014). Jacopo Tintoretto in process: The making of a Venetian master, 1540–1560 (PhD Thesis). Columbia University.Google Scholar
  25. Ione, A. (2005). Innovation and visualization: Trajectories, strategies, and myths. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, C., Meyer, R., Jancsary, D., & Höllerer, M. (2017). The material and visual basis of institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 621–646). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langlais, X. (1959). La technique de la peinture a l’huile. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  29. Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer, R. (1969). A dictionary of art terms and techniques. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  32. Moeran, B. (2013). The business of creativity: Toward an anthropology of worth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Mokyr, J. (2016). A culture of growth: Origins of the modern economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Munir, K. A., & Phillips, N. (2005). The birth of the ‘Kodak moment’: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1665–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicholls, T. (2015). Tintoretto: Tradition and identity. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  36. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, K., & Grabowski, M. (1996). Organizations, technology and structuring. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 409–423). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Rosand, D. (1997). Painting in sixteenth-century Venice: Titian, Veronese. Tintoretto: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sgourev, S. V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science, 24(6), 1601–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sgourev, S. V. (2018). Strange Bedfellows: Art and Finance or the Monet-ization of Art. In C. Jones & M. Maoret (Eds.), Frontiers of creative industries: Exploring structural and categorical dynamics (pp. 73–101). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinberg, A., & Wylie, J. (1990). Counterfeiting nature: Artistic innovation and cultural crisis in renaissance Venice. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32(1), 54–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stokstad, M., & Cothren, M. (2016). Art: A brief history. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  49. Van Mander, K. (1994 [1707]). The lives of the illustrious Netherlandish and German painters. Doornspijk, The Netherlands: Davaco.Google Scholar
  50. Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESSEC Business SchoolCergyFrance

Personalised recommendations