Advertisement

Undertaking Work in a House

  • Manon Istasse
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

Construction work is a way to make one’s house different from others. Various actors are involved in such work (owners, workers, members of institutions) and in the rules and permits related to these work. They also refer to several words (restoration, conservation, modernisation) and principles (tradition, spirit of the house, comfort) when talking about construction work. It appears that both Moroccans and foreigners living in the medina undertake such work but do not put heritage at the core of their experience. Construction work may be defined as a learning process—particularly for foreign residents. Finally, the notions of legality and the ruses are at the core of construction work.

References

  1. Aboudrar, Abdeslam. 2005. La lutte contre la corruption: le cas du Maroc. Rapport du cinquantenaire de l’indépendance du Royaume du Maroc. Rabat: Royaume du Maroc.Google Scholar
  2. Akesbi, Azeddine. 2008. La corruption endémique au Maroc: béquille de l’économie de la rente. Paper presented at the colloque ‘Défiance, corruption, rentes: les dilemmes du développement au Maroc’, du 6 au 7 juin 2008 à Aix en Provence. http://www.fichier-pdf.fr/2011/05/12/la-corruption-endemique-au-maroc-bequille-de-l-economie-de-la-rente/la-corruption-endemique-au-maroc-bequille-de-l-economie-de-la-rente.pdf, 18 October 2012.
  3. Aouni, Moussa, and Mohammed E.L. Faïz. 2005. The Fez Medina Tourist Circuits. Fez: ADER-Fez.Google Scholar
  4. De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gallotti, Jean. 1926. Le jardin et la maison arabe au Maroc. Paris: Albert Lévy.Google Scholar
  6. Gravari-Barbas, Maria. 2005. Habiter le patrimoine. Approches, enjeux, vécus. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  7. Guedez, Annie. 2004. La ‘belle maison’ dans la Grande Lande. In Le goût des belles choses, ed. Véronique Nahoum-Grappe and Odile Vincent, 49–65. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hsu, Tun-Chun. 2005. Le patrimoine urbain entre sauvegarde et pastiche: le cas de la ville de Troyes. In Habiter le patrimoine. Approches, enjeux, vécus, ed. Maria Gravari-Barbas, 187–205. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  9. Koechlin, Lucy. 2019. In or Out? Emerging Urban Practices of Citizenship in East Africa. In Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights, ed. Italo Pardo and Giuliana B. Prato, 217–234. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96238-2.Google Scholar
  10. Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as process. In The Social Life of Things, ed. Arjun Appaduraï, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lahbil-Tagemouati, Naima. 2001. Dialogue en médina. Casablanca: Le Fennec.Google Scholar
  12. McGuinness, Justin, and Zoubeïr Mouhli. 2013. Restaurer une maison à patio à Fès: ‘savoir-quoi’, ‘savoir comment’ et communication interculturelle (2000–2009). In Médinas immuables?, ed. Elsa Colsado, Justin McGuinness, and Catherine Miller, 237–257. Rabat: Centre Jacques Berque.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mernissi, Fatima. 1994. Dreams of Trespass: Tales of a Harem Girlhood. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, Daniel. 1988. Appropriating the State on the Council Estate. Man 23 (2): 353–372.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2802810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morin, Edgar. 1990 [1982]. Science avec conscience. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Paccard, André. 1981. Le Maroc et l’artisanat traditionnel islamique dans l’architecture. Paris: Editions Atelier 74.Google Scholar
  17. Pardo, Italo. 1992. ‘Living’ the House, ‘Feeling’ the House: Neapolitan Issues in Thought, Organization and Structure. European Journal of Sociology 33 (2): 251–279.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600006469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pardo, Italo, and Giuliana B. Prato. 2018. Introduction: The Ethnography of Legitimacy and Its Theoretical Ramifications. Urbanities 8 (Suppl. 1): 1–8.Google Scholar
  19. Pardo, Italo, and Giuliana B. Prato. 2019. Legitimacy. Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96238-2.Google Scholar
  20. Prato, Giuliana B. 2019. On the Legitimacy of Democratic Representation: Two Case Studies from Europe. In Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights, ed. Italo Pardo and Giuliana B. Prato, 27–56. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96238-2.Google Scholar
  21. Rosen, Lawrence. 1984. Bargaining for Reality. The Construction of Social Relations in a Muslim Community. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rosen, Lawrence. 2002. The Culture of Islam. Changing Aspects of Contemporary Muslim Life. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manon Istasse
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Anthropologie des Mondes ContemporainsUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations