Advertisement

Triggering Communal Peer Pressure: Spreading a Shared Understanding of Demands

  • Laurence L. Delina
Chapter

Abstract

Communal peer pressure catalyzes a sense of obligation among social groups, and encourages and nudges people who, at first, may not identify with those groups to blend, fit in, and conform to the larger expectations of those groups. Social comparison—communal peer pressure, horizontal diffusion of climate actions, and instilling a strong sense of common obligation—could be summoned as a motivator for climate actions. Mobilization strategies built around it can complement established drivers of participation such as care for sustainability, forethinking about the future generations of humans and non-humans, and economic incentives.

Keywords

Peer pressure Relationship Obligation Unity Trust Nudge In-group mobilization Common enemy 

References

  1. Alcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, I., Raseman, S., & Shih, A. (2012). Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 29, 992–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brekke, K. A., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). The behavioural economics of climate change. The Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24, 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. M. (1989). Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94–103.Google Scholar
  9. Cruz-Del Rosario, T., & Dorsey, J. M. (2013). Street, shrine, square, and soccer pitch: Comparative protest spaces in Asia and the Middle East. Air & Space Power Journal-Africa & Francophonie, 4, 80–96.Google Scholar
  10. Dalton, D. (1993). Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolent Power in Action. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, N. (2016, October 24). Pope Francis’s edict on climate change has fallen on closed ears, study finds. The Guardian. https://bit.ly/2dPExbg.
  12. Donner, S. D., & McDaniels, J. (2013). The influence of national temperature fluctuations on opinions about climate change in the U.S. since 1990. Climatic Change, 118, 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandhi, M. K. (1930). Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi (Vol. 43). New Delhi: Digital Library of India. Google Scholar
  14. Greenberg, M. R. (2014). Energy policy and research: The under-appreciation of trust. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC. (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, & W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (p. 32). Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
  16. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2013). ‘Nudging’ hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win–win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 119, 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kallbekken, S., Sælen, H., & Hermansen, E. A. T. (2012). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: A field experiment on lifetime energy costs and household appliances. Journal of Consumer Policy, 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohl, H. (2000). Rosa Parks and the Montgomery bus boycott. In J. Birnbaum & C. Taylor (Eds.), Civil Rights Since 1787: A Reader on the Black Struggle. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Montiel, C. J. (2006). Political psychology of nonviolent democratic transitions in Southeast Asia. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parks, R. (1992). Rosa Parks: My Story. New York: Dial Books.Google Scholar
  23. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Small, D. A., & Simonsohn, U. (2008). Friends of victims: Personal experience and prosocial behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 532–542.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change: Psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2016). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Stern, P. (2014). Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Framing of Decisions. Economic Theory, 251, 8.Google Scholar
  30. Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIREs Climate Change, 1, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence L. Delina
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations