Advertisement

Recovering from Work-Related Strain and Stress with the Help of a Persuasive Mobile Application: Interview-Based Thematic Analysis of Micro-entrepreneurs

  • Markku KekkonenEmail author
  • Harri Oinas-Kukkonen
  • Eveliina Korkiakangas
  • Jaana Laitinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11433)

Abstract

People often have long-term personal goals regarding health behavior change. Recently, the processes for achieving these goals have begun to be supported through behavior change support systems and especially through their persuasive software features. In a multidisciplinary research project focused on helping micro-entrepreneurs to recover from work-related strain and stress, a persuasive mobile application was developed. For gaining insights about the workings of the system and its persuasive features, we conducted 29 interviews with the system users. We used thematic analysis method with a deductive emphasis for analyzing the interviews. For some, concurrent usage of wearables or other applications led to discarding our application. Users thought that the application was relatively persuasive, but technical issues reduced its persuasiveness noticeably. When functioning properly, self-monitoring and reminders were found to be supportive for users to achieve their goals. Unobtrusiveness was found to increase the persuasiveness of reminders, while self-monitoring always seems to be dependent on the user’s personal needs.

Keywords

Health Behavior change Recovery from work Goal setting Mobile application Persuasive Systems Design Self-monitoring Reminders Thematic analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank our colleagues at Promo@Work research project, funded by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland, contract no. 303430 (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health) and contract no. 303431 (University of Oulu, OASIS).

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., Jha, A.: Research commentary—the digital transformation of healthcare: current status and the road ahead. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 796–809 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goh, J.M., Gao, G., Agarwal, R.: Evolving work routines: adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inf. Syst. Res. 22(3), 565–585 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borrelli, B., Ritterband, L.M.: Special issue on eHealth and mHealth: challenges and future directions for assessment, treatment, and dissemination. Health Psychol. 34(S), 1205 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meier, C.A., Fitzgerald, M.C., Smith, J.M.: eHealth: extending, enhancing, and evolving health care. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 15, 359–382 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(6), 1223–1235 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Official J. Eur. Union 46 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 28 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C.: The transtheoretical approach. Handb. Psychother. Integr. 2, 147–171 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ng, J.Y., et al.: Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 325–340 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Halttu, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuading to reflect: role of reflection and insight in persuasive systems design for physical health. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 32(5–6), 381–412 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    King, N.: Using interviews in qualitative research. In: Cassel, C., Gillian, S. (eds.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. SAGE, London (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T.: Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15(3), 398–405 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karppinen, P., et al.: Persuasive user experience in health behavior change support system: a 12-month study for prevention of metabolic syndrome. Int. J. Med. Inform. 96, 51–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., Moules, N.J.: Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int. J. Qual. Meth. 16(1) (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  17. 17.
    King, N.: Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In: Cassel, C., Gillian, S. (eds.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. SAGE, London (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fereday, J., Muir-Cochrane, E.: Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int. J. Qual. Meth. 5(1), 80–92 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gregory, R., Muntermann, J.: Theorizing in design science research: inductive versus deductive approaches. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markku Kekkonen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Harri Oinas-Kukkonen
    • 1
  • Eveliina Korkiakangas
    • 2
  • Jaana Laitinen
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Oulu Advanced Research on Service and Information SystemsUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (Työterveyslaitos)HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations