Evaluation of Breastfeeding Mobile Health Applications Based on the Persuasive System Design Model

  • Shahla MeedyaEmail author
  • Muhamad Kashif Sheikh
  • Khin Than Win
  • Elizabeth Halcomb
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11433)


The rapid and ongoing growth in information technology has created many applications for health and wellbeing, including breastfeeding. However, due to a lack of rigorous evaluation of these applications, midwives and other health professionals are unable to recommend any specific breastfeeding application in supporting women towards long-term breastfeeding as a global challenge. Only half of women in developed countries continue any form of breastfeeding for six months. The aim of this study was to evaluate the existing breastfeeding applications based on the Persuasive System Design model. An online search was conducted of the Apple Store in May 2017. The search strategy included the following keywords: breastfeeding, lactation and breast milk. After being checked against the inclusion criteria, each application was assessed based on the four Persuasive System Design Principles. Data from each application was then compared for each element of the design model. Eleven applications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Primary task support and system credibility support principles were addressed at acceptable level in all of the included apps. However, dialogue support and social support principles and their features like praise, reward and social networking were not identified in many of the applications. This review demonstrates the lack of dialogue support and social support principles that could augment human to computer dialogue. There is a need for designing a breastfeeding app that can persuade women to engage and continue breastfeeding based on a full Persuasive System Design model, thus promoting long term breastfeeding.


Breastfeeding Persuasive Systems Design Evaluation 


  1. 1.
    Langrial, S., Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M., Karrippnen, P.: Native mobile applications for personal wellbeing: a persuasive system design evaluation. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mobasheri, M.H., Johnston, M., King, D., Leff, D., Thiruchelvam, P., Darzi, A.: Smartphone breast applications–what’s the evidence? Breast 23, 683–689 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, S., Miron Shatz, T., Schumacher, N., Krocza, J., Diamantidis, C., Albrecht, U.-V.: mHealth: experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    García-Gómez, J.M., De La Torre-Díez, I., Vicente, J., Robles, M., López-Coronado, M., Rodrigues, J.J.: Analysis of mobile health applications for a broad spectrum of consumers: a user experience approach. Health Inform. J. 20, 74–84 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meedya, S., Fahy, K., Kable, A.: Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: a literature review. Women Birth 23, 135–145 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krishnamurti, T., Davis, A., Wong-Parodi, G., Fischhoff, B., Sadovsky, Y., Simhan, H.: Development and testing of the MyHealthyPregnancy app: a behavioural decision research-based tool for assessing and communicating pregnancy risk. JMIR mHealth uHealth 10, e42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asiodu, I.V., Waters, C.M., Dailey, D.E., Lee, K.A., Lyndon, A.: Breastfeeding and use of social media among first-time African American mothers. JOGNN – J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 44, 268–278 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meedya, S., Fernandez, R., Fahy, K.: Effect of educational and support interventions to increase long-term breastfeeding rates in primiparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implementation Rep. 15, 2307–2332 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matthews, J., Win, K.T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Freeman, M.: Persuasive technology in mobile applications promoting physical activity: a systematic review. J. Med. Syst. 40, 72 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lau, E.Y., Lau, P.W., Chung, P.K., Ransdell, L., Archer, E.: Evaluation of an internet-short message service-based intervention for promoting physical activity in Hong Kong chinese adolescent school children: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15, 425–434 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Win, K., Roberts, M., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system features in computer mediated lifestyle modification interventions for physical activity. Inform. Health Soc. Care 1–19 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karppinen, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Alahäivälä, T., Jokelainen, T., Keränen, A., Salonurmi, T., Savolainen, M.: Persuasive user experiences of a health behavior change support system: a 12-month study for prevention of metabolic syndrome. Int. J. Med. Inform. 96, 51–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Migneault, J.P., et al.: A culturally adapted telecommunication system to improve physical activity, diet quality, and medication adherence among hypertensive African-Americans: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Behav. Med. 43, 62–73 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelders, S.M., Kok, R.N., Ossebaard, H.C., Van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.: Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 14, e152 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amico, K.R., et al.: The information-motivation-behavioral skills model of ART adherence in a deep south HIV+ clinic sample. AIDS Behav. 13, 66–75 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osborn, C.Y., Amico, K.R., Fisher, W.A., Egede, L.E., Fisher, J.D.: An information—motivation—behavioral skills analysis of diet and exercise behavior in Puerto Ricans with diabetes. J. Health Psychol. 15, 1201–1213 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shrestha, R., Altice, F.L., Huedo-Medina, T.B., Karki, P., Copenhaver, M.: Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model among high-risk drug users in treatment. AIDS Behav. 21, 1299–1308 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisher, C.M.: Adapting the information-motivation-behavioral skills model: predicting HIV-related sexual risk among sexual minority youth. Health Educ. Behav. 39, 290–302 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E., Mulakaparambil Unnikrishnan, S., Win, K.T.: mHealth applications: a tool for behaviour change in weight management. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 252, 158–163 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organization: Ten steps to successful breastfeeding, Revised 2018. Accessed 28 Jan 2019
  23. 23.
    Chomutare, T., Fernandez-Luque, L., Årsand, E., Hartvigsen, G.: Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, e65 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taki, S., Campbell, K., Russell, C., Elliott, R., Laws, R., Denney-Wilson, E.: Infant feeding websites and apps: a systematic assessment of quality and content. Interact. J. Med. Res. 4, e18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Preece, J., Shneiderman, B.: The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 13–32 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carter, T., O’Neill, S., Johns, N., Brady, R.: Contemporary vascular smartphone medical applications. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 27, 804–809 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neithercott, T.: Health apps. 12 on-the-go diabetes tools for your smartphone. Diab. Forecast 66, 34–37 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosser, B.A., Eccleston, C.: Smartphone applications for pain management. J. Telemed. Telecare 17, 308–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stevens, D.J., Jackson, J.A., Howes, N., Morgan, J.: Obesity surgery smartphone apps: a review. Obes. Surg. 24, 32–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P.: A framework for understanding trust factors in web-based health advice. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 697–713 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hansen, J.: Stillbirth: Pregnant Women Warned to Avoid Smartphone App with Two Babies Recently Dying. The Daily Telegraph News Corp., Surry Hills (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wolf, J.A., et al.: Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol. 149, 422–426 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shahla Meedya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Muhamad Kashif Sheikh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Khin Than Win
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Halcomb
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Gippsland Primary Health NetworkTraralgonAustralia

Personalised recommendations