Advertisement

Responding to Disasters

  • Elena PedeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)

Abstract

The chapter critically examines the contemporary structure of risk management by drawing on resilience perspective. Usually, disaster risk studies and emergency management are rooted in the PPRR chain (prevision, prevention, response and recovery) in which each step includes several actions, and competences are laid down by law. Its emphasis is on identifying exposure and vulnerability to risk and on bouncing back to normalcy. The result is a rigid process in which there is great attention given to the more predictable types of events and impacts, while less consideration is given to the interactions among actors across multiple scales and time frames. Network and cooperative relationships are taken for granted, even if they include a large number of actors with different skills. The central argument of the chapter is the key role that knowledge production, implementation and dissemination and the learning processes have in building resilience. The first part of the chapter analyses the multiple levels and sectors of interventions of the PPRR chain, illustrating the cross-scale challenges; while the second part problematises the integration of diverse disciplines knowledge and the role of collaborative knowledge production in a resilience approach.

Keywords

PPRR chain Emergency management Competences Knowledge systems Collaborative knowledge production Social learning 

References

  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosini V, Bowman C (2001) Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. J Manag Stud 38:811–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9:18Google Scholar
  4. Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning; a theory of action perspective. Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  5. Baggett S, Jeffrey P, Jefferson B (2006) Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination 187:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bignami DF (2010) Protezione civile e riduzione del rischio disastri. Metodi e strumenti di governo della sicurezza territoriale e ambientale. Maggioli EditoreGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowditch JL, Buono AF (2005) A primer on organizational behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ Sci 2:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buizer M, Arts B, Kok K (2011) Governance, scale and the environment: the importance of recognizing knowledge claims in transdisciplinary arenas. Ecol Soc 16:18Google Scholar
  12. Cai G, MacEachren AM, Brewer I et al (2005) Map-mediated geocollaborative crisis management. In: Intelligence and security informatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F et al (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapin FS, Lovecraft AL, Zavaleta ES et al (2006) Policy strategies to address sustainability of Alaskan boreal forests in response to a directionally changing climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:16637–16643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comfort L, Ko K, Zagorecki A (2004) Coordination in rapidly evolving systems: the role of information. Am Behav Sci 48:295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cong X, Pandya KV (2003) Issues of knowledge management in the public sector. Electron J Knowl Manag 1:25–33Google Scholar
  17. Cook SD, Yanow D (1993) Culture and organizational learning. J Manag Inq 2:373–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costanza R, Wainger L, Folke C (1993) Modeling complex ecological economic systems. Bioscience 43:545–555.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1311949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crosta P (1998) Politiche. Quale conoscenza per l’azione territoriale. FrancoAngeli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  20. Davoudi S, Brooks E, Mehmood A (2013) Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Plan Pract Res 28:307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davoudi S, Shaw K, Haider LJ et al (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? “reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? the politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Plan Theory Pract 13:299–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA (2003) The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Blackwell Pub., MaldenGoogle Scholar
  23. ECHO (2014) EU civil protection legislation - ECHO factsheetGoogle Scholar
  24. Elwood S (2010) Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Prog Hum Geogr 34:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Communities (2009) Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions—a community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disastersGoogle Scholar
  26. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T et al (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO J Hum Environ 31:437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B et al (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gherardi S (2000) Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization 7:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Hagemann S, Letz C, Vossen G (2007) Web service discovery-reality check 2.0. In: Third international conference on next generation web services practices, 2007. NWeSP 2007, pp 113–118Google Scholar
  33. Hendriks PH, Dessers E, Van Hootegem G (2012) Reconsidering the definition of a spatial data infrastructure. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:1479–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kallinikos J (2001) The age of flexibility: managing organizations and technology. Academia Adacta, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  35. Kapucu N (2012) Disaster and emergency management systems in urban areas. Cities 29:S41–S49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kok K, Veldkamp TA (2011) Scale and governance: conceptual considerations and practical implications. Ecol Soc 16:23Google Scholar
  37. Koraeus M (2008) Who knows? The use of knowledge management in crisis. CRISMART, National Defence CollegeGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuhlicke C, Steinführer A (2013) Searching for resilience or building social capacities for flood risks? Plan Theory Pract 14:103–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Langefors B (1996) Essays on infology. Chartwell-BrattGoogle Scholar
  40. Laughy L (1991) A planner’s handbook for emergency preparedness. Centre for human settlements. University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  41. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindberg H, Sundelius B (2012) Whole of society disaster resilience: the swedish way. In: The McGraw-Hill homeland security handbook. strategic guidance for a coordinated approach to effective security and emenrgency management, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1295–1319Google Scholar
  43. McEvoy D, Fünfgeld H, Bosomworth K (2013) Resilience and climate change adaptation: the importance of framing. Plan Pract Res 28:280–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nonaka I (2008) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review PressGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Reilly T (2005) What is web 2.0Google Scholar
  46. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, et al (2007a) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12:5Google Scholar
  48. Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P et al (2007b) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc 12:30Google Scholar
  49. Palermo PC, Ponzini D (2014) Inquiry and design for spatial planning. Three approaches to planning research in late modern cities. In: Research methods in spatial and regional planning. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 28:211–228.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022917721797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pede E (2018) Improving resilience through cross-scale knowledge sharing. In: Brunetta G, Caldarice O, Tollin N et al (eds) urban resilience for risk and adaptation governance. Theory and practice. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Polanyi M (2009) The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  53. Quarantelli EL (2000) Disaster planning, emergency management and civil protection: the historical development of organized efforts to plan for and to respond to disasters. Preliminary, p 301Google Scholar
  54. Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G et al (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15:11Google Scholar
  55. Renn O (2015) Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:8–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0037-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Resilience Alliance (2010) Assessing and managing resilience in social-ecological systems: a practitioner’s workbook, Version 2.0Google Scholar
  57. Rogers K (1998) Managing science/management partnerships: a challenge of adaptive management. Conserv Ecol 2:R1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rothe D (2017) Climate change and security: from paradigmatic resilience to resilience multiple. In: Chandler D, Coaffee J (eds) The Routledge handbook of international resilience. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Roux DJ, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, et al (2006) Bridging the science–management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecol Soc 11:4Google Scholar
  60. Salvemini M, Vico F, Iannucci C (2011) Plan4all project. Interoperability for spatial planning. Plan4all ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  61. Sapountzaki K, Wanczura S, Casertano G et al (2011) Disconnected policies and actors and the missing role of spatial planning throughout the risk management cycle. Nat Hazards 59:1445–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scanlon J (1982) The roller coaster story of civil defence planning in Canada. Emerg Plann Dig 6Google Scholar
  63. Schön D (1971) Beyond the stable state. Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  64. Schön DA (1982) Some of what a planner knows a case study of knowing-in-practice. J Am Plann Assoc 48:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Scott M (2013) Living with flood risk. Plan Theory Pract 14:103–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith K (2009) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 5th edn. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, Lieshout M van (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15:29Google Scholar
  70. Tsoukas H (2005) Complex knowledge: studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  71. Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J et al (2012) Drivers, “slow” variables, “fast” variables, shocks, and resilience. Ecol Soc 17:30Google Scholar
  72. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  73. Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7:225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. White I (2013) The more we know, the more we know we don’t know: reflections on a decade of planning, flood risk management and false precision. Plan Theory Pract 14:103–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilbanks TJ (2006) Chapter 2 how scale matters: some concepts and findings. In: Bridging scales and knowledge systems, pp 22–35Google Scholar
  76. Wilbanks TJ, Kates RW (1999) Global change in local places: how scale matters. Clim Change 43:601–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yanow D (2000) Seeing organizational learning: a cultural’ view. Organization 7:247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Young O (2006) Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecol Soc 11:27–43Google Scholar
  79. Zaucha J, Davoudi S, Slob A et al (2016) State-of-the-lagoon reports as vehicles of cross-disciplinary integration. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:690–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and PlanningPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations