Advertisement

Resilience: A Critical Background

  • Elena PedeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)

Abstract

The chapter aims to develop a conceptual framework for orienting the resilience-building challenges in planning. In a world in which the only certainty is uncertainty, resilience has become one of the most widely used concepts that has come to prominence in understanding and managing complex systems in the last decade (Welsh, Geogr J, 180:15–26, 2014). The concept of resilience was firstly formulated in ecology during the 1960s, but it has influenced many other research fields. With the advent of the social-ecological perspective, the resilience theory has also influenced political and human geography and environmental studies, with new explorations and paradigms (Davoudi et al, Plan Theory Pract 13:299–333, 2012). In particular, resilience has become a “pillar” of disaster management, climate adaptation, and regional economic development (Davoudi et al, Plan Pract Res, 28:307–322, 2013). However, the widespread use of resilience thinking has not brought any conceptual clarity but has instead contributed to the fuzzy character of the concept. The chapter firstly traces the conception of resilience and its three main currents: engineering resilience, ecological resilience, and socio-ecological resilience. Secondly, it presents how resilience can be linked with vulnerability, and finally it outlines the resilience interpretative approach to emergency management asserted in this work. The chapter also deals with the criticism to resilience in the literature, such as the unified positive meaning given to the concept and the devolution involving responsibility.

Keywords

Resilience Social-ecological systems Panarchy Adaptive management Transformability Planning 

References

  1. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. Link Soc Ecol Syst Manag Pract Soc Mech Build Resil 1–25Google Scholar
  3. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertuglia CS, Staricco L (2000) Complessità, autoorganizzazione, città. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourbeau P (2013) Resiliencism: premises and promises in securitisation research. Resilience 1:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brundtland G, Khalid M (1987) UN Brundtland commission report “Our Future”Google Scholar
  7. Chandler D (2014) Beyond neoliberalism: resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience 2:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandler D, Coaffee J (2017) The Routledge handbook of international resilience. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Coaffee J, Wood DM, Rogers P (2009) The everyday resilience of the city: how cities respond to terrorism and disaster. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke [England]; New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crutzen P (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415:23.  https://doi.org/10.1038/415023aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davoudi S, Shaw K, Haider LJ et al (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Plan Theory Pract 13:299–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davoudi S, Brooks E, Mehmood A (2013) Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Plan Pract Res 28:307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Env Resour 31:365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edson MC (2010) Group development: a complex adaptive systems perspective. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the ISSS-2010, Waterloo, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2005) Frontier research: the European challenge. High level expert group report BrusselGoogle Scholar
  16. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B et al (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fünfgeld H, McEvoy D (2012) Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? Plan Theory Pract 13:324–328.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter B, Welp M (2008) Human/nature interaction in the anthropocene. GAIA 17(1):77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev 4:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gotts NM (2007) Resilience, panarchy, and world-systems analysis. Ecol Soc 12:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Isl WashGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunderson LH, Allen CR, Holling CS (2009) Foundations of ecological resilience. Island PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 31–34Google Scholar
  28. Holling CS (2004) From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecol Soc 9Google Scholar
  29. Jahn T, Becker E, Keil F, Schramm E (2009) Understandind social- ecological systems: frontier research for sustainable development. Implication for European Research PolicyGoogle Scholar
  30. Lambin EF (2005) Conditions for sustainability of human–environment systems: Information, motivation, and capacity. Glob Environ Change 15:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McAslan A (2010) Community resilience. Understanding the concept and its application. Torrens Resilience Institute, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  32. Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller F, Osbahr H, Boyd E et al (2010) Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts. Ecol Soc 15:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell T, Harris K (2012) Resilience: a risk management approach. ODI Backgr Note January Lond Overseas Dev InstGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsson L, Jerneck A, Thoren H et al (2015) Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Sci Adv 1:e1400217.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 28:211–228.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022917721797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pendall R, Foster KA, Cowell M (2010) Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM (2004) Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc Urban Plan 69:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Porter L, Davoudi S (2012) The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Plan Theory Pract 13:329–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reghezza-Zitt M, Rufat S, Djament-Tran G et al (2012) What resilience is not: uses and abuses. Cybergeo Eur J GeogrGoogle Scholar
  42. Resilience Alliance (2010) Assessing and managing resilience in social-ecological systems: a practitioner’s workbook, Version 2.0Google Scholar
  43. Shaw K (2012) “Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice. Plan Theory Pract 13:308–312Google Scholar
  44. Simmie J, Martin R (2010) The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3:27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith K (2009) environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 5 edn. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teigão dos Santos F, Partidário MR (2011) SPARK: strategic planning approach for resilience keeping. Eur Plan Stud 19:1517–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Welsh M (2014) Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. Geogr J 180:15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Westley F (1995) Governing design: the management of social systems and ecosystems management. In: Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutionsGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkinson C (2012) Urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Plan Theory Pract 13:319–324.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and PlanningPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations