Lies, Damned Lies, Science, and Theology: Why Everyone Needs to Know the Truth About Science and Religion

  • Richard CheethamEmail author
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 48)


A deep concern for the pursuit of truth needs to underlie both the philosophy and the practice of education if we are to enable students to move beyond the widespread prevailing conflict model of the relationship between science and religion to a more nuanced understanding which better reflects the academic literature on the science and religion interface. This chapter will begin by illustrating the pervasiveness of the conflict caricature in popular culture, using examples from the Twittersphere, comedians, popular novels, films, and documentaries. It then argues that the lack of space in much current science education for engaging in any real depth with the history and philosophy of science has allowed students to persist in their belief in the conflict model. This does not do justice to the richness of the academic debate about the relationship between science and religion. The conflict model can be further reinforced in students by some approaches to religious education which effectively embrace an understanding that true knowledge is only properly defined through empirical science. In order to move beyond this persistent conflict model, we need a more holistic philosophy of education in which the pursuit of truth has a much more central position. This involves the interaction of multiple languages: scientific, mathematical, musical, poetic, artistic, philosophical, and theological. These languages are not directly translatable from one to another, nor are they reducible to a single basic language. But it is both possible and vital to relate them one to another. This relationship between science and other disciplines draws on the insight of Aquinas that religio and scientia are essentially virtues, mental habits which assist in the pursuit of truth rather than being objectivised intellectual systems. It can also be illustrated by trying to describe what it means to be human, using multiple different languages and exploring how they relate to one another in building up the fullest picture of reality and truth.


  1. Barbour, I. G. (1998). Religion and science –historical and contemporary issues. London: SCM.Google Scholar
  2. Billingsley, B., Brock, R., Taber, K. S., & Riga, F. (2016). How students view the boundaries between their science and religious education concerning the origins of life and the universe. Science Education, 100, 459. Accessed 28 April 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, D. (2000). Angels and Demons. New York: Pocket Books. Accessed 27 April 2017.
  4. Brown, D. (2003). The Da Vinci Code. New York: Doubleday. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
  5. Cheetham, R. (1999). The nature and status of religious belief if contemporary Britain (with particular reference to the concept of “truth”) as reflected by acts of collective worship in a sample of Luton schools since the 1988 Education Reform Act. London: King’s College London. Unpublished thesis.Google Scholar
  6. Coulson, C. (1955). Science and Christian belief. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, K. W. (1969). Nationalism and its alternatives. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. Draper, J. (1875). History of the conflict between science and religion. London: Henry King & Co.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, P. (2012, December 22). Dear religion… Yours, science: The joke that needs to go away. The Huffington Post. Accessed 27 Apr 17.
  10. Equipping Christian leadership in an age of science. (2017). Accessed 28 Apr 2017.
  11. Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawking, S. (2018). Brief answers to the big questions. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  13. Inherit the Wind. (Film; 1960). United Artists Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lawton, G. (2014, May). World without God. New Scientist, 222(2967), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary – The divided brain and the making of the western world. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Murray, P. D. (2005). Truth and reason in science and theology: Points of tension, correlation and compatibility. In C. Southgate (Ed.), God, humanity and the cosmos: A companion to science and religion (pp. 82–115). Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
  18. Numbers, R. L. (Ed.). (2009). Galileo goes to jail and other myths about science and religion. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. Radcliffe, T. (2005). What is the point of being a Christian? London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
  21. Ratzinger, J. (2005, April 18). Homily of his eminence Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Dean of the College of Cardinals. Accessed 28 Apr 2017.
  22. Richardson, W. M., & Wildman, W. (Eds.). (1996). Religion and science: History, method, dialogue. New York: Taylor & Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Ward, K. (2008). The big questions in science and religion. West Conshohocken: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  24. White, A. D. (1896). History of the warfare of science with theology in Christendom. New York: D. Appleton and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bishop of KingstonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations