Advertisement

Developing a Workshop for Secondary School Students that Provides a Space to Explore Questions About Human Personhood Through the Context of Human-like Machines

  • Berry BillingsleyEmail author
  • Mehdi Nassaji
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 48)

Abstract

This chapter explains the rationale, design and evaluation of a series of activities for secondary school students which were developed by specialists in education, neuroscience and philosophy as part of the LASAR (Learning about Science and Religion) ‘Being Human’ project. The activities were designed to develop students’ epistemic insight and expressed curiosity about the Big Question of human personhood, in the context of nearly human-like machines. Our motivation was a concern that some students may be missing the language and cross-disciplinary frameworks they need to make critical comparisons between human-like machines and human beings. The sessions were informed by existing research that explores apparent contradictions on the question of personhood when looking at both scientific and religious accounts. The aim was to give school students access to the idea that scientific and nonreductive (including religious) ways of thinking about personhood can be compatible. The data gathered from workshop participants revealed that students were engaged by the workshop and that students’ epistemic insight was enhanced by the teaching. The workshop outlines are offered here and can be used to develop guidelines to explore the links between scientific findings and religious accounts of personhood.

References

  1. BBC. (2012, August 23). Robot learns to recognise itself in mirror. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19354994
  2. Billingsley, B. (2010). Secondary school pupils’ thinking about Apparent Contradictions between science and religion. Paper presented at the Association of Tutors in Science Education (ATSE) Annual Conference, Manchester.Google Scholar
  3. Billingsley, B., Taber, K. S., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2013). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion; A preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1715–1732.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9317-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billingsley, B., Brock, R., Taber, K. S., & Riga, F. (2016a). How students view the boundaries between their science and religious education concerning the origins of life and the universe. Science Education, 100(3), 459–482.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21213
  5. Billingsley, B., Nassaji, M., Costa, A., & Chappell, K. (2016b). What do teenagers believe about the soul? Findings from a survey and interview study with upper secondary school students. In N. Spurway (Ed.), Science and religion forum 40th anniversary book. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge scholar publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Billingsley, B., Nassaji, M., Fraser, S., & Lawson, F. (2018). A framework for epistemic insight. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1115–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9788-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, W. (2004). Neurobiological Embodiment of Spirituality and Soul. In M. A. Jeeves (Ed.), From cells to souls, and beyond: Changing portraits of human nature (pp. 58–77). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Dowell, R. (2018). Fundamental protections for non-biological intelligences or: How we learn to stop worrying and love our robot brethren. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 19, 305.Google Scholar
  10. Feinberg, J. (1994). Freedom and fulfillment: Philosophical essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Konnemann, C., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2016). Insights into the diversity of attitudes concerning evolution and creation: A multidimensional approach. Science Education, 100(4), 673–705.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Racine, E., Waldman, S., Rosenberg, J., & Illes, J. (2010). Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Social Science & Medicine, 71(4), 725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Spencer, B. (2015, March 15). Scan that says it’s true love: Brain experts say they can tell what stage of romance someone is at by looking at MRI results. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2995741/The-scan-says-s-true-love.html
  14. Suterwala, A. (2012). First self-aware robot created. Retrieved from https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2012/09/25/first-self-aware-robot-created/
  15. Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). To what extent do pupils perceive science to be inconsistent with religious faith? An exploratory survey of 13-14 year-old English pupils. Science Education International, (2), 22, 99–118.Google Scholar
  16. Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The grammar of schooling: Why has change been so hard? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LASAR (Learning about Science and Religion)Canterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations