Advertisement

Truth in Science and ‘Truth’ in Religion: An Enquiry into Student Views on Different Types of Truth-Claim

  • Christina EastonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 48)

Abstract

Using focus groups, this small-scale, qualitative study investigated the way that students tend to think about religious truth-claims as compared to other types of truth-claim. All the student participants conceived of religious truth-claims as ‘opinions’, to be contrasted with the certain, indisputable ‘facts’ of science. For many students, it was the lack of empirical verification, as well as the existence of disagreement, which meant religious beliefs were relegated to this position. If these findings are generalisable, then there are implications for the ongoing theoretical dispute over the extent to which truth should be a focus in religious education. The tendency for students to see religious claims as subjective lends support for a critical pedagogy that places evaluation of truth centre-stage. The findings also suggest a need for religious education and science teachers to include more reflection on the nature of the scientific method in their schemes of work in order to dispel the myths of unanimity and certainty in science.

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2010). Exploring the nature of science. http://www.project2061.org/publications/guides/science.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019.
  3. Atkins, P. (1995). Science as truth. History of the Human Sciences, 8(2), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayer, A. J. (1990). Language, truth and logic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Bagdonas, A., & Silva, C. C. (2015). Enhancing teachers’ awareness about relations between science and religion the debate between steady state and big bang theories. Science and Education, 24, 1173–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billingsley, B., Brock, R., Taber, K. S., & Riga, F. (2016). How students view the boundaries between their science and religious education concerning the origins of life and the universe. Science Education, 100(3), 459–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cooling, T. (2012). Faith, religious education and whole school issues. In L. Philip Barnes (Ed.), Debates in religious education (pp. 88–97). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, A. (2010). Defending religious pluralism for religious education. Ethics and Education, 5(3), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easton, C. (forthcoming). Looking for answers? A qualitative study examining relativism about religious and moral truth amongst secondary school students [Working Paper].Google Scholar
  11. Easton, C., Goodman, A., Wright, A., & Wright, A. (2019). Critical religious education in practice: A teacher’s guide for the secondary classroom. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erricker, C., & Erricker, J. (2000). Reconstructing religious, spiritual and moral education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  13. Gallup. (2002). Who is Jesus? http://www.gallup.com/poll/7471/who-jesus.aspx. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  14. Gallup. (2013). Most Americans believe in Jesus’ virgin birth. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/12/25/most-americans-believe-in-jesus-virgin-birth/. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  15. Gauch, H. G. (2009). Science, worldviews, and education. Science and Education, 18, 667–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  17. Grimmitt, M. (2000). Pedagogies of religious education. Essex: McCrimmons.Google Scholar
  18. Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The inter-relationship of science and religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hull, J. M. (1992). The transmission of religious prejudice. British Journal of Religious Education, 14(2), 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hull, J. M. (2000). Religionism and religious education. In: M. Leicester and S. Modgil (Eds.), Spiritual and religious education (pp. 75–85). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hume, D. (1992). Treatise of human nature. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  22. Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Law, S. (2006). The war for children’s minds. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, S. Y., Kesebir, S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2016). Gender differences in response to competition with same-gender coworkers: A relational perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 869–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matthews, M. R. (2009). Science, worldviews and education: An introduction. Science and Education, 18(6-7), 641–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Planning focus groups. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wright A. (2007). Critical religious education, multiculturalism, and the pursuit of truth. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wright, A. (2013). Christianity and critical realism. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations