Advertisement

FDI Motivations in CEE Countries. The Role of Governance Ethics

  • Oana Cristina Popovici
  • Adrian Cantemir Călin
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

We revisit the topic of FDI motivations for the Central and Eastern European region, taking into account the different levels of economic development of the source countries. Our modelling setup includes fixed effects panel models, relying on data specific to five CEE states in the 2003–2012 period. In this context, we investigate the significance of a wide set of FDI determinants categorized according to a motive-based taxonomy, evidencing a vivid interest for the impact raised by the good governance of the host countries. We find that, in general, investors from emerging countries are market-oriented and target locations with strategic resources in their quest to harness benefits and skills. On the opposite spectrum, investors from developed economies select host countries on the basis of the potential of transferring and using technology and on the basis of endowment with strategic-assets. As compared to other types of determinants, we notice the fact that variables pointing to good governance are significant for investors from emerging markets, but overlooked by those in developing countries. We conclude that investors located in countries with different levels of economic development have distinct investing motivations. Those originating from emerging countries display a market-seeking behaviour and asset-augmenting motivations, while those from developed countries are rather asset-exploiting interested, being attracted by market opportunities and efficient and strategic-assets abundant host locations.

Keywords

FDI motivations FDI determinants Good governance CEE countries Panel data analysis 

References

  1. Altomonte C. FDI in the CEEC’s and the Theory of Real Options: An Empirical Assessment, Discussion Paper No.76/1998, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, K.U.Leuven, Belgium, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Baltagi B. Econometric analysis of panel data. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. Bellak C, Leibrecht M. Do low corporate income tax rates attract FDI? Evidence from Central- and East European countries. Appl Econ. 2009;41:2691–703.Google Scholar
  4. Bellak C, Leibrecht M, Stehrer R. The role of public policy in closing foreign direct investment gaps: an empirical analysis. Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Working Paper 48; 2008.Google Scholar
  5. Bevan A, Estrin S, Meyer K. Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review 2004;13(1):43–64.Google Scholar
  6. Buckley P, Clegg LJ, Cross AR, Liu X, Voss H, Zheng P. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. J Int Bus Stud. 2007;38(4):499–518.Google Scholar
  7. Buckley PJ, Munjal S, Enderwick P, Forsans N. Cross-border acquisitions by Indian multinationals: asset exploitation or asset augmentation? Int Bus Rev. 2016;25(4):986–96.Google Scholar
  8. Carstensen K, Toubal F. Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: a dynamic panel analysis. J Comp Econ. 2004;32:3–22.Google Scholar
  9. Child J, Rodrigues SB. The internationalization of Chinese firms: a case for theoretical extension? Manag Organ Rev. 2005;1(3):381–410.Google Scholar
  10. Chudnovsky D, Lopez A. A third wave of FDI from developing countries: Latin American TNCs in the 1990s. Transl Corp. 2000;9(2):31–73.Google Scholar
  11. Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Zhang J. Corruption, good governance and FDI location in China: a province-level analysis. J Dev Stud. 2009;45(9):1494–512.Google Scholar
  12. Darby J, Desbordes R, Wooton I. Does public governance always matter? How experience of poor institutional quality influences FDI to the South. CESifo working paper: Trade Policy, No. 3290; 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Duanmu JL. Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs). J World Bus. 2012;47(1):64–72.Google Scholar
  14. Duanmu JL, Guney Y. A panel data analysis of locational determinants of Chinese and Indian outward foreign direct investment. J Asia Bus Stud. 2009;3(2):1–15.Google Scholar
  15. Dunning JH. The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. J Int Bus Stud. 1988;19(1):1–31.Google Scholar
  16. Dunning JH. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley; 1993.Google Scholar
  17. Dunning JH. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. Int Bus Rev. 2000;9:163–90.Google Scholar
  18. Dunning JH. Institutional reform, FDI and European Transition Economies, Henley Business School, Reading University, Economics & Management Discussion Papers, No. Em-dp2004-14; 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Dunning JH, Kim C, Park D. Old wine in new Bottles: a comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developed-country TNCs thirty years ago. In: Sauvant KS, editor. The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets. New York: Columbia University/Edward Elgar Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Estrin S, Meyer K E. Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies: Strengthening the Gains from Integration. in Globalization and Economic Diversification: Policy Challenges for Economies in Transition, editor Bob Vos, Series: The United Nations Series on Development, Bloomsbury Academic, 2008. Google Scholar
  21. Franco C, Rentocchini F, Marzetti GV. Why do firms invest abroad? An analysis of the motives underlying foreign direct investments, Universita degli Studi di Trento, Discussion Paper No. 17; 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Gammeltoft P. Emerging multinationals: outward FDI from the BRICS countries. Int J Technol Glob. 2008;4(1):5–22.Google Scholar
  23. Gammeltoft P, Fasshauer K. Characteristics and host country drivers of Chinese FDI in Europe: a company-level analysis. Int J Technol Manag. 2017;74:140–66.Google Scholar
  24. Gani A. Governance and foreign direct investment links: evidence from panel data estimations. Appl Econ Lett. 2007;14(10):753–6.Google Scholar
  25. Goodspeed T, Martinez-Vazquez J, Zhang L. Are other government policies more important than taxation in attracting FDI? Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Research Paper Series, Working Paper 06-28; 2006.Google Scholar
  26. Guimon J. Government strategies to attract R&D-intensive FDI. J Technol Transf. 2009;34:364–79.Google Scholar
  27. Hsiao C. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  28. Janicki H, Wunnava PP. Determinants of foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from EU accession candidates. Appl Econ. 2004;36:505–9.Google Scholar
  29. Jindra B, Hassan SS, Cantner U. What does location choice reveal about knowledge-seeking strategies of emerging market multinationals in the EU? Int Bus Rev. 2016;25:204–20.Google Scholar
  30. Kayalvizhi PN, Thenmozhi M. Does quality of innovation, culture and governance drive FDI? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev. 2018;34:175–91.Google Scholar
  31. Kim S. Effects of outward foreign direct investment on home country performance evidence from Korea. In: Ito T, Krueger AO, editors. The role of foreign direct investment in East Asian economic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000. p. 295–317.Google Scholar
  32. Kinoshita Y, Campos NF. Why does FDI go where it goes? New evidence from the transition economies, William Davidson Institute, Working Paper 573; 2003.Google Scholar
  33. Kinoshita Y, Campos NF. A Re-examination of determinants of foreign direct investment in transition economies, Mimeo, IMF, Washington, DC; 2006.Google Scholar
  34. Kolstad I, Wiig A. What determines Chinese outward FDI? CMI Working Paper 3; 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Lansbury M, Pain N, Smidkova K. Foreign direct investment in Central Europe since 1990: an econometric study. Natl Inst Econ Rev. 1996;156:104–13.Google Scholar
  36. Lipsey RE. Home- and host-country effects of foreign direct investment. In: Baldwin RE, Winters LA, editors. Challenges to globalization: analyzing the economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  37. Lopez DA. The effects of economic factors in determining the transition process in Europe and Central Asia, Macalester College, Award Winning Economics Papers, Paper 8; 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Luo T, Tung RL. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. J Int Bus Stud. 2007;38:481–98.Google Scholar
  39. McCaleb A, Szunomar A. Chinese foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: an institutional perspective. In: Drahokoupil J, editor. Chinese investment in Europe: corporate strategies and labour relations. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute; 2017. p. 121–40.Google Scholar
  40. Mateev M I. Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Southeastern Europe: New Empirical Tests, 8th Global Conference on Business & Economics, Italy, 2008.Google Scholar
  41. Narula R. Do we need different frameworks to explain infant MNEs from developing countries? Glob Strateg J. 2012;2(3):188–204.Google Scholar
  42. Padilla-Perez R, Gomes Nogueira C. Outward FDI from small developing economies: firm level strategies and home-country effects. Int J Emerg Mark. 2016;11(4):693–71.Google Scholar
  43. Pananond P. Motives for foreign direct investment: a view from emerging market multinationals. Multinatl Bus Rev. 2015;23(1):77–86.Google Scholar
  44. Pournarakis M, Varsakelis N. Institutions, internationalization and FDI: the case of economies in transition. Transnational Corp. 2004;13(2):77–94.Google Scholar
  45. Quer D, Claver E, Rienda L. Cultural distance, political risk and location decisions of emerging-market multinationals: a comparison between Chinese and Indian firms. J Asia Pac Econ. 2017;22:587–603.Google Scholar
  46. Ramasamy B, Yeung M, Laforet S. China’s outward foreign direct investment: location choice and firm ownership. J World Bus. 2012;47:17–25.Google Scholar
  47. Rihab BA, Lotfi BJ. The institutional and cultural determinants of foreign direct investment in transition countries. J Res Int Bus Manage. 2011;1(2):171–82.Google Scholar
  48. Te Velde DW. Foreign Direct Investment and Development. An historical perspective, Background paper for World Economic and Social Survey for 2006; 2006.Google Scholar
  49. Tintin C. Do Institutions Matter for FDI? Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries, 13 Annual ETSG Conference, 8–10 September 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  50. Tondl L. Foreign direct investment during transition. Determinants and patterns in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, Chr. Michelsen Institute, CMI Working Paper WP 2001:9.Google Scholar
  51. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Report 2006. FDI from developing and transition economies: implications for development. New York/Geneva: UNCTAD; 2006.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang X, Daly K. The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Emerg Mark Rev. 2011;12:389–98.Google Scholar
  53. Zhang Y, Filippov S. Internationalization of Chinese firms in Europe, UNU-merit working paper series 041; 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oana Cristina Popovici
    • 1
  • Adrian Cantemir Călin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of International Business and Economics, Bucharest University of Economic StudiesInstitute for Economic Forecasting, Romanian AcademyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations