Is the Employees’ Performance Appraisal Process Different in the Large Romanian Companies? An Empirical Research
Knowing more in depth the process of employees’ performance process is important especially because it enables the identification of those characteristics that should be treated with an increased interest in order to improve organizational performance and finally the employees’ motivation and productivity.
The aim of the study is to highlight the key characteristics of the employee performance appraisal process in the Romanian companies using an empirical research based on a sample of 301 employees from micro-enterprises (21.9%), small enterprises (32.9%), medium enterprises (23.6%) and large companies (21.6%). The main research question of the study is: there are some significant differences regarding the employees’ performance evaluation according to the company size? In order to respond to this question, descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis test) were used.
The empirical results revealed that in most companies the evaluation of the employees’ performance is done once per year, the main elements of interest being the quality of work and the knowledge level of the job.
The majority of employees from all kind of companies declared that as a result of the assessments made in the last 3 years, their salary has increased, but the employees from large companies tend to be more satisfied with the results of the evaluations. Asked if they have been led to increase their professional training, only employees from large companies declared that they have participated in internal courses.
KeywordsEmployees’ performance Romanian companies Kruskal-Wallis test
- Bretz RD, Milkovich GT, Read W. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: concerns, directions, and implications. J Manag. 1992;18(2):1992.Google Scholar
- Bucurean M, Costin MA. Organizational stress and its impact on work performance. Ann Fac Econ Univ Oradea Fac Econ. 2011;1(special):333–7.Google Scholar
- Grigore A, Bâgu C, Radu C, Cătăneţ A. Competitiveness and performance on the cosmetics market. Ann Fac Econ. 2011;1(2):681–6.Google Scholar
- Levy PE, Williams JR. The social context of performance appraisal: a review and framework for the future. J Manag. 2004;30(6):881–905.Google Scholar
- Matei M, Abrudan M-M. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. An investigation of performance correlation on students. Ann Univ Oradea Econ Sci Ser. 2011;20(1):671–7. 7p. 5 Charts, 1 GraphGoogle Scholar
- Murphy KR, Cleveland JN. Human resource management series. Performance appraisal: an organizational perspective. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 1991.Google Scholar
- Murphy KR, Cleveland JN. Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.Google Scholar
- Popescu D, Chivu I, Ciocârlan-Chitucea A, Popescu DO. Human resources motivation - a challenge for SMES economic performances. In: Conference proceedings - European integration-new challenges. 7th ed; 2011. p. 1715–20.Google Scholar
- Savlovschi LI, Robu NR. General considerations regarding the evaluation of performances of employees in a SME. Ann Fac Econ Univ Oradea Fac Econ. 2011;1(2):719–22.Google Scholar
- Wiese DS, Buckley MR. The evolution of the performance appraisal process. J Manag Hist. 1998;4(3):233–49.Google Scholar