Advertisement

The Concept of Hidden Caries

  • Christopher DeeryEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

As caries levels declined in the early 1970s due to the increased availability of fluoride, it was suggested that the presence of fluoride was resulting in later cavitation and therefore making occlusal caries diagnosis more difficult. Dentinal carious lesions not detected clinically but diagnosed radiographically were termed “hidden caries”. The evidence from studies before and after the introduction of fluoride does not support this concept. It is much more likely that the reduction in caries just drew dentists’ attention to these clinically hard to detect lesions. Depending on the diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of clinically undetectable dental lesions ranges from 2 to 25%, the lower of these figures being found when a meticulous caries diagnostic system is used. To ensure no lesions are missed, radiographic examination is required.

Keywords

Caries Occlusal Diagnosis Hidden caries Fluoride 

References

  1. 1.
    Sawle RF, Andlaw RJ. Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose? A study comparing clinically undetected lesions in molar teeth of 14–16-year old children in 1974 and 1982. Br Dent J. 1988;164:209–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Backer Dirks O, Houwink B, Kwant GW. The results of 6.5 years of artificial fluoridation of drinking water in the Netherlands: the Tiel-Culemborg experiment. Arch Oral Biol. 1961;5:284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weerheijm KL, Kidd EAM, Groen HJ. The effect of fluoridation on the occurrence of hidden caries in clinically sound occlusal surfaces. Caries Res. 1997;31:30–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whelton H, O’Mullane DO, McLoughlin J. Caries levels in Ireland according to varying diagnostic criteria. J Dent Res. 1996;75:85.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hashizume LN, Mathias TC, Cibils DM, Maltz M. Effect of the widespread use of fluorides on the occurrence of hidden caries in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23:72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Konig KG. Dental morphology in relation to caries resistance with special reference to fissures as susceptible areas. J Dent Res. 1963;42:461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sognnaes RF. The importance of a detailed clinical examination of carious lesions. J Dent Res. 1940;19:11–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slack GL, Jackson D, James PMC, Lawton FE. A clinical investigation into the variability of dental caries diagnosis. Br Dent J. 1958;104:399–404.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weerheijm KL, Gruythuysen RJM, van Amerongen WE. Prevalence of hidden caries. J Dent Child. 1992;59:408–12.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Creanor SL, Russell JI, Strang DM, Stephen KW, Burchell CK. The prevalence of clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries in Scottish adolescents. Br Dent J. 1990;169:126–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wenzel A, Fejerskov O, Kidd E, Joyston-Bechal S, Groeneveld A. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs. Caries Res. 1990;24:327–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kidd EAM, Naylor NM, Wilson F. Prevalence of clinically undetected and untreated molar occlusal dentine caries in adolescents on the Isle of Wight. Caries Res. 1992;26:397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weerheijm K, Groen HJ, Bast AJJ, Kieft JA, Eijkman MAJ, van Amerongen WE. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: a radiographic comparison. Caries Res. 1992;26:305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deery C, Fyffe HE, Nugent Z, Nuttall NM, Pitts NB. The effect of placing a clear pit and fissure sealant on the validity and reproducibility of occlusal caries diagnosis. Caries Res. 1995;29:377–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deery C. Caries detection and diagnosis, sealants and management of the possibly carious fissure. Br Dent J. 2013;214:551–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spierer WA, Fuks AB. Pre-eruptive intra-coronal resorption: controversies and treatment options. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;38(4):326–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR, ICDAS Foundation. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and its International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS)—methods for staging of the caries process and enabling dentists to manage caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:e41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V. Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res. 2003;82:117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children. Caries Res. 1999;33:340–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Clinical DentistryUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations