Advertisement

Design and Optimization of Epoxy/Glass Fiber Drive Shaft for Passenger Vehicle

  • Rajaram M. ShindeEmail author
  • Suresh M. Sawant
  • L. B. RautEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

Use of composite material resulted in improved performance in the field of automobile engineering. Composites are light in weight and are stiffer compared to conventional structural materials like steel. In this paper, the composite drive shaft is designed and optimised using Teaching Learning Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm technique. In this work, the composite driveshaft is designed for a passenger vehicle. The optimised composite shaft is tested for critical speed, natural frequency, and torsional strength. The experimental results showed that the glass epoxy composite drive shaft with stacking sequence [54/−54/54/−54]23 and 70% fibre volume fraction gave the optimum weight with great improvement in the performance when compared with the conventional structural steel drive shaft.

Keywords

Composite drive shaft Teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) Natural frequency Critical speed 

References

  1. 1.
    Rao RV (2016) TLBO algorithm and its engineering applications. Springer Publications, ChamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Satheesh Kumar Reddy P, Nagaraju C (2017) Weight optimization and finite element analysis of composite automotive drive shaft for maximum stiffness. Mater Today Proc 4:2390–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rios C, Bakis CE (2011) “Multi physics design and optimization of flexible matrix composite driveshaft”, ELSEVIER. Compos Struct 93:2231–2240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee DG, Sung Kim H, Woon Kim J, Kook Kim J (2004) Design and manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminum/composite drive shaft. Compos Struct 63:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shokrieh MM, Hasani A, Lessard LB (2004) Shear buckling of a composite drive shaft under torsion. Compos Struct 64:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sino R, Baranger TN, Chatelet E, Jacquet G (2008) Dynamic analysis of a rotating composite shaft. Compos Sci Technol 68:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mutasher SA (2009) Prediction of the torsional strength of the hybrid aluminum/composite drive shaft. Mater Des 30:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abu Talib AR, Ali A, Badie MA, Lah NAC, Golestaneh AF (2010) Developing a hybrid, carbon glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composite automotive drive shaft. Mater Des 31:514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Badie MA, Mahdi E, Hamouda AMS (2011) An investigation into hybrid carbon/glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite automotive drive shaft. Mater Des 32:1485–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaw AK (2013) Mechanics of composite materials. Taylor and Francis Group, CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motangier O, Hochard C (2013) Optimisation of hybrid high-modulus/high-strength carbon fiber reinforced plastic composite drive shafts. Mater Des 46:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elmarakabi A (2014) Advanced composite materials for automotive applications. Wiley Publications, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones RM (2009) Mechanics of composite materials. Taylor and Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cherniaev A, Komarov V (2014) Multistep optimization of composite drive shaft subject to strength, buckling, vibration and manufacturing constraints. Appl Compos Mater 22:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gay D (2015) Composite materials design and applications. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Automobile EngineeringRIT. Shivaji UniversityIslampurIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringRIT. Shivaji UniversityIslampurIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringSVERI Solapur UniversitySolapurIndia

Personalised recommendations