Advertisement

Activated Pulsed-Tungsten Inert Gas Welding of DSS 2205

  • Dhananjay S. Satelkar
  • Bhagwan F. Jogi
  • Shrikant B. Thorat
  • Ajay A. ChavanEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

The present study relates investigating the effect of four kinds of fluxes, SiO2, MnO2, TiO2, Al2O3,and no flux was used in activated-pulsed tungsten inert gas welding (A-PTIG) process on ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), elongation, and weld morphology of Duplex Stainless Steel SS2205. This study involves a novel variant of the Activated-pulsed TIG welding process, was applied to 6 mm thick DSS 2205 plate through a thin layer of flux to join plate-to-plate using a butt joint. The oxide fluxes used were employed in powdered form. The experimental results indicate that using SiO2, MnO2, TiO2, and Al2O3 fluxes lead to a significant increase in the capacity of TIG welds. The employed activated -Pulsed TIG welding showed that increase in joint penetration and weld depth-to-width ratio, thereby reducing the angular distortion of the weldments. Weld morphology of all the weld was studied and correlated with the mechanical properties.

Keywords

Oxide fluxes Pulsed-TIG DSS 2205 Mechanical properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Badji R, Bouabdallah M, Bacroix B, Kahloun C, Belkessa B, Maza H (2008) Phase transformation and mechanical behavior in annealed 2205 duplex stainless steel welds. Mater Charact 59(4):447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cui S, Shi Y, Sun K, Gu S (2018) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of keyhole deep penetration TIG welds of S32101 duplex stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 709:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verma J, Taiwade RV (2017) Effect of welding processes and conditions on the microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel weldments—a review. J Manuf Process 25:134–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pramanik A, Littlefair G, Basak AK (2015) Weldability of duplex stainless steel. Mater Manuf Process 30(9):1053–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korra NN, Balasubramanian KR, Vasudevan M (2015) Optimization of activated tungsten inert gas welding of super duplex alloy 2507 based on experimental results. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 229(8):1407–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakthivel T, Vasudevan M, Laha K, Parameswaran P, Chandravathi KS, Mathew MD, Bhaduri AK (2011) Comparison of creep rupture behavior of type 316L (N) austenitic stainless steel joints welded by TIG and activated TIG welding processes. Mater Sci Eng A 528(22–23):6971–6980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tathgir S, Bhattacharya A, Bera TK (2015) Influence of current and shielding gas in TiO2 flux activated TIG welding on different graded steels. Mater Manuf Process 30(9):1115–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tseng KH, Hsu CY (2011) Performance of activated TIG process in austenitic stainless steel welds. J Mater Process Technol 211(3):503–512MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chern TS, Tseng KH, Tsai HL (2011) Study of the characteristics of duplex stainless steel activated tungsten inert gas welds. Mater Des 32(1):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmad A, Alam S (2017) A review on pulsed TIG welding. J Recent Activities Prod 2(1, 2)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhananjay S. Satelkar
    • 1
  • Bhagwan F. Jogi
    • 1
  • Shrikant B. Thorat
    • 1
  • Ajay A. Chavan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological UniversityLonereIndia

Personalised recommendations