Structural Health Monitoring of Thin Wall Composite Beam Using Static and Dynamic Analysis

  • Pradip D. Haridas
  • Prashant M. Pawar
Conference paper


In this work, a structural health-monitoring for the thin walled damaged composite beam was performed. The cross-sectional stiffness reduction obtained through physics-based models is expressed as a function of the life of the structure employing a recent phenomenological damage model. This stiffness reduction has been further employed to study the behaviour of measurable system parameters such as blade deflections, loads, and strains of a thin walled composite beam in static analysis. The experimental, as well as simulated measurements, are obtained using a static and dynamic analysis of the thin walled composite beam based on the finite element in space and time with physics-based damage modes which are then linked to the life consumption of the beam. The static, as well as dynamic set up, is developed for prediction of physical damage and life consumption employing displacement and force based measurement deviations between damaged and the undamaged conditions. Furthermore, a local online prediction of physical damage and life consumption is performed using strains measured along the blade length. It is noted that the life consumption in the matrix-cracking zone is about 12–15% and life consumption in debonding/delamination zone is about 45–55%of the total life of the blade.


Thin walled composite beams Dynamics Uncertainties Stiffness Health monitoring 


  1. 1.
    Knight P, Cook J, Azzam H (2005) Intelligent management of helicopter health and usage management systems data. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 219(G6):507–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Postdam M, Yeo H, Johnson W (2006) Rotor air loads prediction using loose aerodynamic/structural coupling. J Aircr 43(3):732–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao QJ, Xu GH, Zhao JG (2006) New hybrid method for predicting the flow fields of helicopter rotors. J Aircr 43(2):372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krzysiak A, Narkiewicz J (2006) Aerodynamic loads on airfoil with trailing-edge flap pitching with different frequencies. J Aircr 43(2):407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pawar PM, Ganguli R (2005) On the effect of matrix cracks in composite helicopter rotor blade. Compos Sci Technol 65(3–4):581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pawar PM, Ganguli R (2005) Modeling multi-layer matrix cracking in thin-walled composite rotor blade. J Am Helicopter Soc 50(4):354–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pawar PM, Ganguli R (2006) Modeling progressive damage accumulation in thin walled composite beams for rotor blade applications. Compos Sci Technol 66(13):2337–2349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pawar PM, Ganguli R (2007) On the effect of progressive damage on composite helicopter rotor system behaviour. Compos Struct 78(3):410–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pawar P, Ganguli R (2007) Fuzzy-logic-based health monitoring and residual life prediction for composite helicopter rotor. J Aircr 44(May–June):981–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pawar P, Reddy K, Ganguli R (2007) Damage detection in beams using spatial Fourier analysis and neural networks. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 251:227–247Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pawar P (2011) The behaviour of thin walled composite beams with stochastic properties under matrix cracking damage. Thin-Walled Struct 49:1123–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradip D. Haridas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Prashant M. Pawar
    • 1
  1. 1.SVERI’s College of EngineeringSolapurIndia
  2. 2.Govt. Industrial Training InstituteAhmednagarIndia

Personalised recommendations