Advertisement

Ranking Material Handling Equipment Selection Criteria by AHP

  • A. V. Gaur
  • B. P. Ronge
Conference paper

Abstract

Determining the criteria of Material Handling equipment selection is a primary and important step in the material handling equipment selection. While these criteria often are in conflict with each other due to which selection of equipment is a complex decision-making process. This paper proposes a ranking of the various criteria of material handling equipment selection based on the AHP method. The criteria for selection of MHE considered for this paper are safety, capacity, cost, standardization, maintenance, flexibility, and space utilization. The ranking of the criteria carried out using AHP. An example has been presented for the method.

Keywords

AHP Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Criteria MCDM 

Nomenclature

MHE

Material Handling Equipment

AHP

Analytical Hierarchy Process

MCDM

Multi-criteria Decision Making

RI

Random Index

CI

Consistency Index

References

  1. 1.
    Apple JM (1972) Material handling system design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apple JM (1980) Plant layout and material handling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghazikalayeh AR, Amirafshari M, Mkrchyan HM, Taji M (2013) Application of fuzzy hybrid analytic network process in equipment selection of open-pit metal mines. Int J Res Ind Eng 2(3):35–46Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karande P, Chakraborty S (2013) Material handling equipment selection using weighted utility additive theory. J Ind Eng 2013:1–9Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paulo J, Lashkari RS, Dutta SP (2002) Operation allocation and materials-handling system selection in a flexible manufacturing system: a sequential modelling approach. Int J Prod Res 40(1):7–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maniya KD, Bhatt MG (2011) A multi-attribute selection of automated guided vehicle using the AHP/M-GRA technique. Int J Prod Res 49(20):6107–6124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varun S, Harshita R, Pramod S, Nagaraju D (2017) Evaluation and selection of material handling equipment in iron and steel industry using analytic hierarchy process. IOP Conf Series 197(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Momani AM, Ahmed AA (2011) Material handling equipment selection using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation and analytic hierarchy process. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 59:953–958Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chakraborty S, Banik D (2006) Design of a Material Handling Equipment Selection Model Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(11–12):1237–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Onut S, Kara SS, Mert S (2009) Selecting the suitable material handling equipment in the presence of vagueness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(7–8):818–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulak O (2005) A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling Equipments. Expert Syst Appl 29(2):310–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mir Hosseini SHL, Hamid L, Webb P (2009) A hybrid fuzzy knowledge-based expert system and genetic algorithm for efficient selection and assignment of material handling equipment. Expert Syst Appl 36(9):11875–11887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan FTS, Ip RWL, Lau H (2001) Integration of expert system with the analytic hierarchy process for the design of material handling equipment selection system. J Mater Process Technol 116(2–3):137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braglia M, Gabbrielli R, Miconi D (2001) Material handling device selection in cellular manufacturing. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10(6):303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Subramanian N, Ramanathan R (2012) A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. Int J Prod Econ 138(2012):215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saaty TL (2004) Decision making with analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zahedi F (1986) The analytic hierarchy process, a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 16(4):96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Gaur
    • 1
  • B. P. Ronge
    • 1
  1. 1.SVERI’s College of EngineeringPandharpurIndia

Personalised recommendations