Advertisement

From Deflection to Reflection: A Creative Involvement with Language

  • Maria Balaska
Chapter

Abstract

Although an experience of astonishment shows a more general problem about the contingency or groundlessness of meaning, it also resists meaning in a very particular way. This is its central trait: Wittgenstein describes such experiences as essentially nonsensical; Lacan as a manifestation of “the signifier in the Real.” In this chapter I argue that although linked with a difficulty of intelligible expression, these experiences are not manifestations of an ineffable content. A different kind of expression, which I earlier called “reflection,” is possible but requires the speaker’s own creative involvement with language, and a certain shift in the kind of expression one was looking for. I discuss “reflection” and offer examples.

References

  1. Appelqvist, H. (2013). Why Does Wittgenstein Say that Ethics and Aesthetics Are One and the Same? In P. Sullivan & M. Potter (Eds.), Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation (pp. 40–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1972). Parts of Animals (Clarendon Aristotle Series) (D. M. Balme, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Balaska, M. (2019). Seeing the Stove as World: Significance (Bedeutung) in the Early Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations, 42(1), 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamond, C. (2000a). Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In A. Crary & R. Read (Eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 149–173). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Diamond, C. (2000b). Does Bismarck Have a Beetle in His Box? In A. Crary & R. Read (Eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 262–292). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Diamond, C. (2011). The Tractatus and the Limits of Sense. In O. Kuusella & M. McGinn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein (pp. 240–275). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Donatelli, P. (2005). The Problem of the Higher in the Tractatus. In D. Z. Phillips & M. von der Ruhr (Eds.), Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy (pp. 11–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dostoyevsky, F. (2002). The Idiot (R. Pevear & L. Volokhonsky, Trans.). London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Friedlander, E. (2014). Missing a Step Up the Ladder. Philosophical Topics, 42(2), 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedlander, E. (2017). Logic, Ethics and Existence in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In R. Agam-Segal & E. Dain (Eds.), Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hacker, P. M. S. (2000). Was He Trying to Whistle It? In A. Crary & R. Read (Eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 353–387). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Hughes, T. (1957). ‘Six Young Men’. Hawk in the Rain. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  14. McGuinness, B. (1966). The Mysticism of the Tractatus. The Philosophical Review, 75, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mulhall, S. (1990). On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Stern, D. (1991). Heraclitus’ and Wittgenstein’s River Images: Stepping Twice into the Same River. Monist, 74, 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tilghman, B. R. (1991). Wittgenstein, Ethics and Aesthetics: The View from Eternity. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Notebooks, 1914–1916 (G. H. von Wright & G. E. M. Anscombe, Eds. and G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L. (1981). Zettel (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Wittgenstein, L. (1992). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Wittgenstein, L. (1993). A Lecture on Ethics. In J. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951 (pp. 37–44). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Balaska
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations