Advertisement

The Groundlessness of Meaning in Lacan’s Work

  • Maria Balaska
Chapter

Abstract

Lacan makes use of a paradoxical phrase to describe the difficulty of expression accompanying an experience of astonishment, that of “the signifier in the Real.” In this chapter I explore the concept of the Real—an inherent limit to the symbolic capacities of language, as what encapsulates the Lacanian story about the groundlessness of meaning and the temptations to avoid it or conceal it. As I show, the Lacanian Real comes with two interpretative temptations: treating the Real as a pre-symbolic reality that conditions our sense-making corresponds to the temptation of a recourse to a metaphysical grounding of meaning, while treating the Real as a post-symbolic point of failure corresponds to the temptation to treat any limit of expression as a fictional product of the symbolic. However, I argue that there is a way to think about the limit beyond these two temptations through the idea that the Real is a potential state for any signifier when the latter has been excluded from significant use.

References

  1. Badiou, A. (2006). The formulas of L’Étourdit. Lacanian Ink, p. 27.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. De Saussure, F. (1972). Cours de linguistique generale (T. de Mauro, Ed.). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (1987). The Postcard: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Eyers, T. (2012). The Signifier-in-relation, the Signifier-in-isolation, and the Concept of the “Real” in Lacan. Parrhesia, 14, 56–70.Google Scholar
  6. Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1991). On Sexuality: Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality and Other Works. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Homer, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, A. (2010). This Philosophy Which is Not One: Jean-Claude Milner, Alain Badiou, and Lacanian Antiphilosophy. S: Journal of the Jan van Eyck Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique, 3(3), 137–158.Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, J. (n.d.-a). Seminar V, The Formations of the Unconscious, 1957–1958 (C. Gallagher, Trans.). Private publication. Retrieved August 24, 2018, from http://www.lacaninireland.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Book-05-the-formations-of-the-unconscious.pdf
  11. Lacan, J. (n.d.-b). Seminar XIV La logique du fantasme, 1966–1967. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  12. Lacan, J. (1979). Seminar XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (J.-A. Miller, Ed. and A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  13. Lacan, J. (1982). Le symbolique, l’imaginaire et le réel (1953). Bulletin de l’Association freudienne, p. 1.Google Scholar
  14. Lacan, J. (1988). Seminar II, The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954–1955 (S. Tomaselli, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  15. Lacan, J. (1990). Television: A Challenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment (J. Copjec, Ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Lacan, J. (1991). Seminar I, Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953–1954 (J.-A. Miller, Ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  17. Lacan, J. (1997). Seminar III, The Psychoses, 1955–1956 (J.-A. Miller, Ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  18. Lacan, J. (1998). Encore. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX. On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Lacan, J. (2002). Écrits (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  20. Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Lacoue-Labarthe, P., & Nancy, J.-L. (1992). The Title of the Letter: A Reading of Lacan. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  22. Meyerson, E. (1925). La déduction relativiste. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  23. Pluth, E. (2007). Signifiers and Acts: Freedom in Lacan’s Theory of the Subject. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  24. Shepherdson, C. (2008). Lacan and the Limits of Language. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Voruz, V., & Wolf, B. (Eds.). (2007). The Later Lacan: An Introduction. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Balaska
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations